Title :
link :
GREAT AGAIN: Unlike Obama, Trump doesn’t bow to Saudi king and Milania wears no hat.
Ivanca and her hubby are Jewish in the heart of Moslemia
American Women Are Becoming ISIS Wives
In its quest to replace soldiers who are dying on the battlefield, ISIS has begun to recruit women from the West — including from America — in order to bear the group offspring. The organization refers to these children as “cubs of the Caliphate,” who it hopes will one day carry on the fight against the United States and its allies. These Western “lionesses of Allah” are thought to now amount to more than 600, and American intelligence agencies have warned that their numbers are rising.
Many of these women show no signs of being outraged or disgusted by the violent acts that the terrorist group is known for — in fact, in many cases, just the opposite is true. Most worrisome is that in a number of the known cases so far, the women appear to have been ordinary Americans or Britons who some residents would consider “the girl next door.”
In Vicksburg, Virginia, Jaelyn Delshaun Young, a 19-year-old ex-cheerleader and honors student was arrested when she attempted to travel to Syria to join ISIS as a potential bride. “I cannot wait to get to Dawlah [ISIS territory] so I can be amongst my brothers and sisters under the protection of Allah swt to raise little Dawlah cubs in sha Allah [God willing],” she wrote to FBI agents she believed to be members of ISIS. (The abbreviation “swt” is a shortening of a traditional Muslim phrase.) Young had recently converted to Islam and had applauded the 2015 terror attack on U.S. soldiers in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
“What makes me feel better after just watching the news is that an akhi [brother] carried out an attack against U.S. Marines in TN! Alhamdulillah [praise Allah], the numbers of supporters are growing,” she wrote. The FBI was able to prove in court that Young had tried to help terrorists target regional U.S. airports, leading to a 12-year federal prison sentence for the young woman.
In suburban Arvada, Colorado, Shannon Maureen Conley was a 19-year-old trained nurse’s aide who wanted to travel to Syria to meet an ISIS suitor who she’d been in online contact with. Conley, who had converted to Islam, had taken to wearing a headscarf around her suburban neighborhood and had aroused suspicions of her neighbors and her parents, who discovered a one-way plane ticket to Turkey with their daughter’s name on it.
Conley had also been spotted firing rifles at a nearby shooting range and walking the grounds of a local “mega-church” taking notes and wearing a backpack. The church’s pastor alerted the FBI, which later questioned the teen. Conley “repeatedly referred to U.S. military bases as ‘targets,'” read the criminal complaint against her. “Conley said she needed to go overseas to be trained in jihad, but she did not need to be overseas to wage jihad.”
Conley had told the FBI that even children and women were “legitimate” targets if they happened to be visiting military bases. “It is OK to harm innocents if they are part of a target,” Conley said. The teen had also referred to attacking a government “motorcade” within the United States.
Conley was arrested at Denver International Airport trying to board a flight to Turkey and was charged with attempting to assist a terrorist organization. She later made a plea deal with the FBI that gave her a four-year reduced prison sentence in exchange for helping the bureau hunt for other Americans with similar intentions.
Former FBI chief James Comey has said that stopping homegrown radicalization via the Internet of Americans is a top priority for the bureau. He said that Syria is both a safe haven and a training ground for recruited Westerners, who often get involved in “the worst kind of relationships and [receive] the worst kind of training.”
In Britain, Sally Jones, a 49-year-old blond-haired former guitarist for the all-girl rock band Krunch is on a special-forces “kill list” for threatening the life of her country’s Queen Elizabeth II. The failed plot was to have taken place on an anniversary of World War II V-J Day in London. In addition, Jones was accused of two further plots, including a plan for a mass shooting at a concert in North Carolina and an attempt to livestream the murder of a U.S. soldier.
Jones had married an ISIS computer hacker named Junaid Hussain, who originally hailed from Birmingham, England. The pair traveled to Raqqa, Syria, where Hussain was killed by a U.S. military drone in 2015. Before his death, the two had become semi-celebrities in the world of ISIS, with both actively recruiting new members from the West. They had been nicknamed “Mr. and Mrs. Terror” by the organization.
Jones and Hussain had two children, one of whom is an 11-year-old boy thought to have been seen in a video in which ISIS youngsters executed captured Kurdish soldiers. Jones is currently believed to be hiding somewhere in Syria or Iraq.
For widows such as Jones, ISIS pays a lifelong stipend, labeling the women “shaheed,” or “wives of martyrs.” “U dnt have 2 pay 4 ANYTHING if u r shaheed,” wrote one Western convert in Syria. ISIS also pays the women to have children. For each “cub of the Caliphate” they deliver, they receive a $25-per-month award, in addition to a $400 maternity bonus and $500 marriage bonus.
But even more sickening is that the terrorist organization is recruiting the women to be suicide bombers or killers like Tashfeen Malik, the wife who helped her Muslim husband slaughter 14 of his innocent co-workers in San Bernardino, California in 2015.
A friend of Sally Jones named Umm Muthanna al-Britani tweeted that she wished to be “martyred in the cause of Allah,” stating, “I came [to Syria] to die. I will not leave till I get what I came here for: shahadah [martyrdom]… Everyone around me is getting shahadah. When will it be my turn?”
When the horrific terror attacks of November 2015 happened in Paris, Muthanna tweeted, “Wish I could have seen the hostages being slaughtered last night with my own eyes. Would have been beautiful… Burn, Paris, burn. LOL, HOW SCARED ARE THESE KUFFAR [non-believers].”
ISIS now incorporates into its marriage certificates language that states, “If the Prince of believers [ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi] consents to [a wife] carrying out a suicide mission, then her husband should not prohibit her.” Terrorism experts say that women pose more of a security threat to Western targets because they arouse less suspicion. They can carry bombs or explosives strapped to their waists while appearing to be pregnant.
“The group is looking ahead to using female cadres for suicide missions,” said Anne Speckhard, the director of the International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism in Washington, D.C.
For the FBI and other law enforcement sources, these are worrying trends that mean more may need to be done online to catch recruits before they act. “It seems unfathomable to most of us that a female would want to join ISIS, but their online propaganda has a major focus on twisting the concept of women’s rights,” noted Ryan Mauro, national security analyst with the Clarion Project and a professor of counterterrorism at Liberty University.
“You’ll see pictures of fully covered women with guns, as if they’re treated as equals in jihad.” The reality, however, is much different, said Mauro, as ISIS is known for mass rape, sex slavery and other apocryphal offenses against women.
“NO SISTER leaves the comfort of their homes just to marry some man,” American ISIS convert Umm Waqqas wrote. “Muslims from all ages are leaving to live in a REAL Muslim country & live under the shades of Sharia [Islamic law].”
Mauro says that the theological angle is the real draw for Western women. “When you look at ISIS propaganda, it’s not just well-produced but well-referenced, with tons of references to Islamic verses and scholars,” he says.
“The propaganda presents researched arguments that enable ISIS recruiters to withstand scrutiny from a prospective recruit. The ISIS caliphate is portrayed as an ideal society on earth where things are great, with women valued, morals upheld, social services that minimize insecurity and newcomers that are welcomed into the family,” he added. “And you get to earn a ticket to paradise if you die standing against the infidel to preserve it.”
~ American Liberty Report
Beautiful Melania Trump Won’t Wear Headscarf in Saudi Arabia
First Ladies Melania Trump and Michelle ObamaBeautiful First Lady Melania Trump will not be asked to wear a headscarf during her visit to Saudi Arabia this week.
Russia Today reported:
America’s first lady has not been “ordered” to dress conservatively in Saudi Arabia, the country chosen by her husband as his first official overseas destination. Along with meetings on the US president’s itinerary, there will also reportedly be time for entertainment in the lavish Arab kingdom.
While the choice of the first country to be visited by Trump as America’s 45th president has been widely discussed in the media, a question has arisen whether there is a chance to see the US president’s wife covered in a traditionally strict Muslim attire.
Women in Saudi Arabia, including foreign visitors, are typically expected to wear a floor length dress – abaya, and a head scarf. However, when asked whether the US first lady would have to dress accordingly, a Saudi Arabia official said Riyadh “usually doesn’t demand” a specific dress-code, but rather “accepts suggestions.”
“We welcome any style in clothing,” Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister, Adel bin Ahmed Al-Jubeir told the media on Thursday, as cited by RIA Novosti.
“We welcome any style in clothing,” Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister, Adel bin Ahmed Al-Jubeir told the media on Thursday, as cited by RIA Novosti.
First 100 Days: Trump's ICE Arrests 41,318 Illegals -- 30,473 Are Criminals!
BY: JOSEPH CURL
He said he would, and now he is.
President Trump ruffled liberal feathers when he claimed that Mexico sends its worse to America, "bad hombres," "rapists," Trump said.
But the latest numbers released this week show that not only is the Trump administration enforcing the actual law on the books -- which makes it illegal to sneak into the United States -- but the stats show nearly 75 percent of those arrested are criminals.
Thomas Homan, acting director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
President Trump ruffled liberal feathers when he claimed that Mexico sends its worse to America, "bad hombres," "rapists," Trump said.
But the latest numbers released this week show that not only is the Trump administration enforcing the actual law on the books -- which makes it illegal to sneak into the United States -- but the stats show nearly 75 percent of those arrested are criminals.
Thomas Homan, acting director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
agency, says his team is keying on illegal aliens with criminal records. But he also says that sneaking into the U.S. is illegal, too.
Both the Washington Post and USA Today, two liberal newspapers, noted high up in their stories on the new numbers that there was a high increase in the number of those arrested "without a criminal record."
"The data show that the biggest jump in arrests involved undocumented immigrants without a criminal record, a 156% increase from last year," USA Today said. "Arrests of immigrants with no criminal records more than doubled to nearly 11,000, the fastest-growing category by far," the Post said. The D.C. paper also said this: "Advocates for undocumented immigrants say the numbers will add to the fears of longtime and otherwise law-abiding residents who felt spared from deportation under the Obama administration."
But Homan said that is just as it should be. "I get asked a lot why we arrest somebody that’s not a criminal," Homan said. "Those who do enter the country illegally, they do violate the law, that is a criminal act."
And he added: “Will the number of non criminal arrests and removals increase this year? Absolutely. That’s enforcing the laws that are on the books.”
USA Today explained the difference between Trump and former president Barack Obama. "Under Obama, undocumented immigrants had to be a gang member, convicted of a felony, or convicted of several misdemeanors to be deemed a deportation priority. Under Trump, undocumented immigrants simply have to be arrested for a crime — not convicted — to become a priority. Trump also allowed ICE agents to focus on undocumented immigrants who they deem to be a 'risk to public safety or national security.' "
Homan explained that ICE is simply doing its job according to the law.
“The men and women of ICE are law-enforcement officers sworn to enforce the law,” Homan said. “And that’s what we’re going to do, and we’re not going to apologize for it.”
But the numbers don't lie. "In Trump’s first 100 days in office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested 41,318 immigrants, up 37.6 percent over the same period last year, the agency said Wednesday," the Post said. Almost 3 of 4 of those arrested -- 30,473 -- have criminal records, "including gang members and fugitives wanted for murder."
Both the Washington Post and USA Today, two liberal newspapers, noted high up in their stories on the new numbers that there was a high increase in the number of those arrested "without a criminal record."
"The data show that the biggest jump in arrests involved undocumented immigrants without a criminal record, a 156% increase from last year," USA Today said. "Arrests of immigrants with no criminal records more than doubled to nearly 11,000, the fastest-growing category by far," the Post said. The D.C. paper also said this: "Advocates for undocumented immigrants say the numbers will add to the fears of longtime and otherwise law-abiding residents who felt spared from deportation under the Obama administration."
But Homan said that is just as it should be. "I get asked a lot why we arrest somebody that’s not a criminal," Homan said. "Those who do enter the country illegally, they do violate the law, that is a criminal act."
And he added: “Will the number of non criminal arrests and removals increase this year? Absolutely. That’s enforcing the laws that are on the books.”
USA Today explained the difference between Trump and former president Barack Obama. "Under Obama, undocumented immigrants had to be a gang member, convicted of a felony, or convicted of several misdemeanors to be deemed a deportation priority. Under Trump, undocumented immigrants simply have to be arrested for a crime — not convicted — to become a priority. Trump also allowed ICE agents to focus on undocumented immigrants who they deem to be a 'risk to public safety or national security.' "
Homan explained that ICE is simply doing its job according to the law.
“The men and women of ICE are law-enforcement officers sworn to enforce the law,” Homan said. “And that’s what we’re going to do, and we’re not going to apologize for it.”
But the numbers don't lie. "In Trump’s first 100 days in office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested 41,318 immigrants, up 37.6 percent over the same period last year, the agency said Wednesday," the Post said. Almost 3 of 4 of those arrested -- 30,473 -- have criminal records, "including gang members and fugitives wanted for murder."
Reddit users brutally destroy Bill Nye’s new Netflix science show: ‘This is absolute dog s**t’
Chris Enloe 
Bill Nye's new Netflix show — "Bill Nye Saves the World," — has received low marks by commenters on Reddit. (Rob Kim/Getty Images)
Reddit users destroyed Bill Nye’s new Netflix program Tuesday in a thread of a show review that became so popular that it found its way to Reddit’s front page and earned Reddit’s version of a “like” more than 60,000 times.
In recent years, Nye, who is known for his 1990s kids’ science show, has become one of the most outspoken critics of people who disagree that manmade climate change is a fact and “settled science.” He regularly appears on cable news shows to debate the topic of climate change and attempts to discredit and shut down anyone who don’t toe his progressive line.
And according to Reddit users, Nye uses the same tone and style in his newest show, “Bill Nye Saves the World,” which debuted on Netflix in April.
In recent years, Nye, who is known for his 1990s kids’ science show, has become one of the most outspoken critics of people who disagree that manmade climate change is a fact and “settled science.” He regularly appears on cable news shows to debate the topic of climate change and attempts to discredit and shut down anyone who don’t toe his progressive line.
And according to Reddit users, Nye uses the same tone and style in his newest show, “Bill Nye Saves the World,” which debuted on Netflix in April.
“In this show he simply brings up an issue, tells you which side you should be on, and then makes fun of people on the other side. To make things worst [sic] he does this in the most boring way possible,” Reddit user “Sloth859,” who described himself as a “huge fan” of Nye’s since the age of 10, wrote in a review of the new show.
“He doesn’t properly explain anything, and he misrepresents every opposing view,” the user explained.
Sloth859 went on to share in lengthy paragraphs three instances where Nye appeared mean-spirited and ignored other scientific theories and ideas in order to push a progressive agenda.
The user noted that in one episode on fad dieting, Nye misrepresented paleo dieting as “only eating meat.” In another episode, Nye “shuts down” nuclear energy as an alternate energy source to fossil fuel, arguing that “nobody wants it.”
In a third episode, “Sloth859” slammed Nye for dismissing vinegar as an alternative medicine source simply because it “doesn’t change the pH level of an acidic solution.” The user continued:
He dismiss [sic] the fact that vinegar has been used to treat upset stomach for a long time. How does vinegar treat an upset stomach? Does it actually work, or is it a placebo effect? Does it work in some cases, and not in others? If it does anything, does it just treat a symptom, or does it fix the root cause? I don’t know the answer to any of these questions because he just dismissed it as wrong and only showed me that it doesn’t change the pH level of an acidic solution. Also, there are many foods that are believed to help prevent diseases like fish (for heart health), high fiber breads (for colon cancer), and
citrus fruits (for scurvy). A healthy diet and exercise will help prevent cardiovascular disease, and will help reduce your blood pressure among other benefits. So obviously there is some reasoning behind some alternative medicine and practices and to dismiss it all as a whole is stupid.
“I just don’t see the point of this show,” the user concluded the review. “It’s not going to convince anyone that they’re wrong, and it’s definitely not going to entertain anyone.”
Other Reddit users concurred with the sentiment of “Sloth859.”
“This show is everything wrong with the public perception of science. Science isn’t about dismissing critical views, and accepting everything you’re told at face value. It’s about critically analyzing the way the world works and challenging your own beliefs. This show is trash and deserves every piece of criticism it receives,” Reddit user “Daeysheperd” wrote in the top comment.
“It seems that most people, right or left, are in agreeance [sic] that this is absolute dog s**t,” user “zorkzamboni” quipped.
Reddit user “CMPluto” said: “This is my favorite Reddit thread of all time. Never have I seen, on Reddit, so many posters from seemingly many different walks of life, share such agreeement [sic]. Thanks Bill. You’ve become the idiot we don’t deserve, but we may need.”
According to movie and television review website Rotten Tomatoes, Nye’s new show has so far earned a 75 percent approval from professional movie and TV critics, but only a 29 percent approval from people who actually watched it. Rotten Tomatoes’ professional reviews, however, has so far been limited to only eight — six positive and two negative.
Meanwhile, the show has even poorer reviews on Mediacritic, which gave the show a 63 percent approval from professional critics. Audience members, on the other hand, give the show an average rating of 1.7 on a scale of 1-to-10. Among audience reviews, 146 were negative, 27 were positive, and three were mixed.
“He doesn’t properly explain anything, and he misrepresents every opposing view,” the user explained.
Sloth859 went on to share in lengthy paragraphs three instances where Nye appeared mean-spirited and ignored other scientific theories and ideas in order to push a progressive agenda.
The user noted that in one episode on fad dieting, Nye misrepresented paleo dieting as “only eating meat.” In another episode, Nye “shuts down” nuclear energy as an alternate energy source to fossil fuel, arguing that “nobody wants it.”
In a third episode, “Sloth859” slammed Nye for dismissing vinegar as an alternative medicine source simply because it “doesn’t change the pH level of an acidic solution.” The user continued:
He dismiss [sic] the fact that vinegar has been used to treat upset stomach for a long time. How does vinegar treat an upset stomach? Does it actually work, or is it a placebo effect? Does it work in some cases, and not in others? If it does anything, does it just treat a symptom, or does it fix the root cause? I don’t know the answer to any of these questions because he just dismissed it as wrong and only showed me that it doesn’t change the pH level of an acidic solution. Also, there are many foods that are believed to help prevent diseases like fish (for heart health), high fiber breads (for colon cancer), and
citrus fruits (for scurvy). A healthy diet and exercise will help prevent cardiovascular disease, and will help reduce your blood pressure among other benefits. So obviously there is some reasoning behind some alternative medicine and practices and to dismiss it all as a whole is stupid.
“I just don’t see the point of this show,” the user concluded the review. “It’s not going to convince anyone that they’re wrong, and it’s definitely not going to entertain anyone.”
Other Reddit users concurred with the sentiment of “Sloth859.”
“This show is everything wrong with the public perception of science. Science isn’t about dismissing critical views, and accepting everything you’re told at face value. It’s about critically analyzing the way the world works and challenging your own beliefs. This show is trash and deserves every piece of criticism it receives,” Reddit user “Daeysheperd” wrote in the top comment.
“It seems that most people, right or left, are in agreeance [sic] that this is absolute dog s**t,” user “zorkzamboni” quipped.
Reddit user “CMPluto” said: “This is my favorite Reddit thread of all time. Never have I seen, on Reddit, so many posters from seemingly many different walks of life, share such agreeement [sic]. Thanks Bill. You’ve become the idiot we don’t deserve, but we may need.”
According to movie and television review website Rotten Tomatoes, Nye’s new show has so far earned a 75 percent approval from professional movie and TV critics, but only a 29 percent approval from people who actually watched it. Rotten Tomatoes’ professional reviews, however, has so far been limited to only eight — six positive and two negative.
Meanwhile, the show has even poorer reviews on Mediacritic, which gave the show a 63 percent approval from professional critics. Audience members, on the other hand, give the show an average rating of 1.7 on a scale of 1-to-10. Among audience reviews, 146 were negative, 27 were positive, and three were mixed.
Revisionist History Hits Roadblock in Alabama Monuments Find Protecton
By Andrew West 
As if it weren’t enough for the liberals of our nation to control the current historical narrative via their stranglehold on the mainstream media, the left has been intimately involved in revising past history as well.
One of their favorite targets has been the American Civil War, and it’s a fairly transparent tactic.
The left has spent countless decades attempting to vilify the South by publicly shaming them for the slavery that “caused the Civil War”, when, in fact, the war itself was truly and unequivocally a result of northern lawmakers’ attempts to sabotage the sovereignty provided by states’ rights as the nation continued westward in Manifest Destiny. Truth aside, the slavery story is what children are taught in schools across the non-southern United States.
Now, in modern context, the left has allowed a sneaky game of association to play out. By equating the South with slavery, (read: Evil), the modern republican grasp on this portion of the United States inherently becomes evil as well. History will teach us that a republican emancipated the slaves, however, the well-trained modern conjecture is that southerners, current day republicans as a whole, were evil slave holders. It is merely another trick of perception by the mainstream elitist media.
In this quest to keep southerners under their thumb, and under the auspices of “political correctness”, liberals the nation over have begun demanding that statues, monuments, and celebrations with Confederate subject matter be swept under the rug or destroyed altogether. It is the epitome of revisionist history, and it is a menace to our nation’s future.
“Alabama lawmakers of Friday approved sweeping protections for Confederate monuments, names and other historic memorials, as some Southern cities rethink the appropriateness of keeping such emblems on public property.
“The measure ‘would prohibit the relocation, removal, alteration, renaming, or other disturbance of any architecturally significant building, memorial building, memorial street, or monument’ that has stood on public property for 40 or more years,’ it
reads. Changes to names or memorials installed between 20 and 40 years ago would need permission from a new state commission.
reads. Changes to names or memorials installed between 20 and 40 years ago would need permission from a new state commission.
“African-American lawmakers opposed the bill at every step of the legislative process, saying argued that solidifies a shameful legacy of slavery.
“‘You say we are protecting history. We are not protecting history. We are protecting monuments that represent oppression to a large part of the people in the state of Alabama,’ said Sen. Hank Sanders, an African-American Democrat from Selma.
“‘You say we are protecting history. We are not protecting history. We are protecting monuments that represent oppression to a large part of the people in the state of Alabama,’ said Sen. Hank Sanders, an African-American Democrat from Selma.
“Supporters argued that the measure should protect all kinds of history — not just Confederate symbols.
“Sen. Gerald Allen, the bill’s Republican sponsor, criticized what he called a ‘wave of political correctness’ wiping out monuments to people he said were historically significant even if they had their personal flaws.”
Every now and then we are able to celebrate common sense victories such as this one, but not without sacrifice.
Just last week, a Confederate monument in Louisiana was removed at the behest of left-leaning groups.
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2017/05/httpift_73.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment