Title :
link :
http://ift.tt/2onj0IO
Tues. July 4, 2017
Happy Birthday USA
2017
Libs Will Have a Mental Breakdown After Seeing This NRA Ad
BY V SAXENA
Liberals across the nation lost their ever-loving minds this week after the National Rifle Association published a recruitment video that urged conservatives to fight back against violent liberalism not with equal doses of violence but with the “clenched fist of truth.”
Using colorful language, outspoken NRA member and conservative commentator Dana Loesch vividly described how liberals routinely distort the truth to manipulate the American people.
And by doing so they have created a climate where fanatical leftists feel it’s their right to riot like maniacs, “scream racism and sexism and xenophobia and homophobia,” “smash windows, burn cars, shut down interstates and airports, bully and terrorize the law-abiding,” etc, she added.
“The only way we stop this,” Loesch continued, “the only way we save our country and our freedom, is to fight this violence of lies with the clenched fist of truth. I’m the National Rifle Association of America, and I’m freedom’s safest place.”
The evidence backs up every allegation Loesch made about the left’s most deranged fanatics. They do riot, they do hurl unsubstantiated allegations and they do terrorize the American people.
Moreover, the only legitimate way to combat this ignorance is to educate as many Americans as possible with the real truth, which for the record bears no similarities to the lies propagandized by the left.
But forget these facts, because just as they always do, the left has completely misinterpreted this ad and claimed to its followers that the ad is tantamount to a call for violence.
“This chilling NRA ad calls on its members to save America by fighting liberals,” the fake news factory known as Vox blatantly lied to its readers.
“NRA recruiting video stops just short of calling for violence against anti-Trump progressives,” added the radical leftist blog Think Progress, which publishes more fake news than even CNN.
The reaction on social media was equally asinine:
This new NRA ad is barely a whisper shy of a call for full civil war. http://ift.tt/2tneWPl …
Conservative commentator Dana Loesch offers apocalyptic commentary in describing American liberals http://ift.tt/2sG5wKy
So yeah, that NRA ad is as disturbing as anything I've ever seen seen from the right. And Dana Loesch looks like hate made flesh in it.
Change the language, put in a guy with a head covering...this is an ISIS propaganda video https://twitter.com/deray/status/880409739015766016 …
@Redpainter1 Dana Loesch is inciting violence on behalf of the NRA & Trump. What kind of a person does that? Reprehensible doesn't begin to cover this.
The left officially has no shame left. For a group that frequently issues actual calls for violence against Republicans, how dare liberal Democrats twist the NRA’s perfectly benign recruiting video and transform it into something it’s clearly not?
Does the truth mean absolutely nothing to the left anymore? Or is there something more to this insane reaction?
Writing for The Daily Wire, commentator Ben Shapiro theorized that this hysteria is nothing more than a flimsy attempt “to shift the narrative away from their own rhetoric and back toward the Right’s.”
He’s probably right. Ever since the election of President Donald Trump, deranged leftists have repeatedly spewed violent rhetoric and, at times, even acted out in violent ways.
It suggests, therefore, that when leftists complain about the NRA’s ad, they’re merely projecting their own violent tendencies onto it — because it’s certainly not conservatives (let alone the conservatives in the NRA) who’ve been the ones acting like crazed fools, you know?
Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about liberals projecting their own violent tendencies onto this NRA ad.
Mexican Drug Lord Who Dismembered 6-Year-Old Girl Gets Life Sentence
"...helping smuggle millions of dollars worth of drugs over the border..."
By Fred Maxwell
34-year-old Marciano “Chano” Millan Vasquez, regional boss for the Zetas drug cartel, was sentenced to seven life sentences in a Texas courtroom Thursday after being found guilty of involvement in the deaths of 29 people in Mexico.
These deaths, which occurred between 2009 and 2015, include those of a 6-year-old girl as well as her parents.
A witness for the prosecution said that Vasquez took an axe and dismembered the little girl while she was still alive, as her parents were forced to watch.
After the girl had been slaughtered, her extremities were thrown into a burning barrel.
After the girl had been slaughtered, her extremities were thrown into a burning barrel.
The witness said the girl was brutally murdered to ensure that the family would “remember” Vasquez.
The mother and father were later killed by Vasquez’s men in the same fashion.
In his testimony, the witness, a convicted drug trafficker, said he was forced to watch as 18 people were killed in one night.
As for the death of the little girl, the witness said, “Chano began… He got the axe and cut off her knee and an arm. … She would cry. She would scream.”
While the deaths occurred in Mexico, Vasquez was living in San Antonio, Texas., opening the door for the United States to arrest and prosecute him for the crimes.
After a July 2016 trial, Vasquez was found guilty of those deaths, along with charges of “killing while engaged in drug trafficking; conspiracy to distribute and import marijuana; distribution of controlled substances outside the U.S. intending that they be imported into the U.S.; employing minors in a drug crime; conspiracy to distribute cocaine; conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine; conspiracy to possess firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime; and, making a false statement to a federal official.”
During the trial, assistant U.S. attorney Russ Leachman said, “The level of violence … is something that is rarely seen in the courtroom and … rarely seen even in fiction.”
Vasquez stood silent as the judge pronounced sentencing.
In his brief statement after the sentencing, U.S. Attorney, Richard L. Durbin, Jr. said, ‘Without mercy or compunction, he brutally murdered anyone and everyone as it suited him and his cartel, at times inflicting the cruelest of pain, forcing relatives to watch their loved ones murdered before he turned his blades on them.”
BBC Worried Holocaust Is a Sensitive Subject… for Muslims
BY V SAXENA
The BBC, known for its left-leaning bias, ran a report Tuesday about the unjustified abuse a couple German Muslim schoolgirls faced during a visit to Holocaust memorials in eastern Poland.
While what these young ladies experienced was appalling, so was a completely unnecessary and highly insensitive, crass statement the BBC made about the Holocaust, a historical event in which Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany exterminated millions of Jews.
“The Holocaust is a sensitive topic for many Muslims because Jewish survivors settled in British-mandate Palestine, on land which later became the state of Israel,” the BBC included in its report, which was later modified but may still be viewed in its original form via the Wayback Machine.
Two wrongs don’t make a right, and this outrageous statement was as wrong as the treatment the young ladies received.
As noted by the U.K.’s Campaign Against Antisemitism, while the Holocaust “is indeed a sensitive topic for many reasons, not least because six million Jews were systematically massacred,” it shouldn’t be for anyone else, especially over absurd reasons.
“For the BBC to lend credence to the notion that it is legitimate to be ‘sensitive’ about the Holocaust because of the existence of the State of Israel invokes anti semitic notions that the existence of the State of Israel is in some way racist, and it is offensive to tar ‘many Muslims’ in this way,” the campaign wrote.
But what’s most fascinating is how this faux pas wound up bringing both Jews and Muslims together, as reported by The Jerusalem Post.
Specifically, the U.K.’s Board of Jewish Deputies teamed up with a Muslim organization to issue a joint statement urging the BBC to promptly edit its report, which it did.
Specifically, the U.K.’s Board of Jewish Deputies teamed up with a Muslim organization to issue a joint statement urging the BBC to promptly edit its report, which it did.
“In a story about Muslim schoolgirls suffering racism as they learn about the Holocaust, why have the BBC included the gratuitous line — offensive to both Muslims and Jews — that ‘the Holocaust is a sensitive topic for many Muslims’?” the board’s vice president, Marie van der Zyl, reportedly told The Jewish Chronicle.
How do you like that? In its bid to be politically correct, the BBC inadvertently united both Jews and Muslims against them for a brief moment in time. Talk about a miracle.
Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about the BBC’s political correctness bringing Jews and Muslims together against them.
Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about the BBC’s political correctness bringing Jews and Muslims together against them.
California Could Be Forced to Follow Anti-Lib Law
BY MARTIN LIOLL
The fact that California’s liberals would have to deal with Donald Trump as president sent snowflakes from San Diego to Sacramento into conniptions. There was even talk of secession, which seems to have quieted down once the geniuses behind it looked at just how much debt their state was in.
Now, one law supported by President Trump and just passed by the House of Representatives could mean that California will be forced to do away with one of their most cherished recent institutions — sanctuary cities.
According to Fox News, the “No Sanctuary for Criminals Act” would restrict federal grants to sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities when it comes to deporting criminal illegal aliens.
“The word ‘sanctuary’ calls to mind someplace safe, but too often for families and victims affected by illegal immigrant crime, sanctuary cities are anything but safe,” Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said in a news conference before the vote.
“It is beyond my comprehension why federal state and local officials … would actively discourage or outright prevent law enforcement agencies from upholding the laws of the United States.”
A similar move by the Justice Department was blocked by a California judge back in April. If the bill passes the Senate and is signed by the president — and that seems likely, given that it passed the lower chamber by a 228-195 vote — it would put cash-strapped California in a dire position.
In a statement, the White House applauded the passage of the “No Sanctuary for Criminals Act” as well as “Kate’s Law,” a similar bill named for San Francisco murder victim Kate Steinle that would impose additional penalties on illegal aliens who reenter the country.
“Sanctuary cities are releasing violent criminals, including members of the bloodthirsty MS-13 gang, back onto our streets every single day,” Trump’s statement said.
“Innocent Americans are suffering unthinkable violence as a result of these cities’ reckless actions … The implementation of these policies will make our communities safer. Opposing these bills, and allowing dangerous criminals back into our communities, our schools, and the neighborhoods where our children play, puts all of us at risk.”
Unfortunately for liberals, overreaching federal judges are going to have less wiggle room to stop this one, which is bad news for the sanctuary city crowd. Good.
We don’t need any more Kate Steinle’s dying because of the the liberal agenda on illegal immigration.
North Korea’s Leader Instantly Regretted Crossing This Red Line
North Korea’s Kim Jong-Un continues to push the world closer to war.
His rogue nuclear weapons program threatens global conflict.
But he never imagined it would lead to this.
China is North Korea’s benefactor.
Trade with Beijing, as well as economic support, keeps North Korea afloat.
China fears that if the North Korean government collapses, they will face a massive influx of refugees.
One area of commerce is fuel.
China’s state oil agency sells North Korea petroleum so they have energy to allow their country to function.
That all changed.
China’s National Petroleum Corporation has suspended business with North Korea over concerns their nuclear weapons program could lead to global conflict and disrupt payments.
Reuters reports:
CHINA NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORP HAS SUSPENDED SALES OF FUEL TO NORTH KOREA OVER CONCERNS THE STATE-OWNED OIL COMPANY WON’T GET PAID, AS PRESSURE MOUNTS ON PYONGYANG TO REIN IN ITS NUCLEAR AND MISSILE PROGRAMS, THREE SOURCES TOLD REUTERS.
IT’S UNCLEAR HOW LONG THE SUSPENSION WILL LAST. A PROLONGED CUT WOULD THREATEN CRITICAL SUPPLIES OF FUEL AND FORCE NORTH KOREA TO FIND ALTERNATIVES TO ITS MAIN SUPPLIER OF DIESEL AND GASOLINE, AS SCRUTINY OF CHINA’S CLOSE COMMERCIAL TIES WITH ITS INCREASINGLY ISOLATED NEIGHBOR INTENSIFIES.
CNPC AND THE MINISTRY OF COMMERCE DID NOT RESPOND TO REQUESTS FOR COMMENT. NORTH KOREA’S EMBASSY IN BEIJING DECLINED TO COMMENT.
CHINESE FOREIGN MINISTRY SPOKESMAN LU KANG, ASKED ABOUT THE SALE SUSPENSION AND WHETHER THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT PUT PRESSURE ON CNPC TO MAKE THIS DECISION, SAID: “I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THIS SITUATION YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT” AND DECLINED TO ELABORATE.
A SOURCE WITH DIRECT KNOWLEDGE OF THE MATTER SAID CNPC DECIDED TO PUT FUEL SALES ON HOLD “OVER THE LAST MONTH OR TWO” AND DESCRIBED IT AS A “COMMERCIAL DECISION.”
“IT’S NO LONGER WORTH THE RISKS,” SAID THE SOURCE. CHINESE AND INTERNATIONAL BANKS ARE STEPPING UP COMPLIANCE CHECKS ON COMPANIES DEALING WITH COUNTRIES ON THE U.S. SANCTIONS LIST, SUCH AS NORTH KOREA, HE SAID.
This could also be seen as China exerting economic pressure in order to force North Korea to back down.
Trump was criticized in the media for not labeling China a currency manipulator, but it was part of a bigger strategy.
He needed China’s help to diffuse the North Korea situation, and there was no need to antagonize them right off the bat when he was counting on their assistance.
The move paid off.
China’s leaders are using the leverage they have to try and get North Korea to pull back from the brink.
War is in no one’s interest.
Tennessee Responds to California’s Travel Ban to the State
BY V SAXENA
At the start of the year, radical leftist California Attorney General Xavier Becerra tried to blackmail a number of Republican-led states by banning state-funded visits to them over what he felt were their anti-gay ordinances.
In the case of Tennessee, Becerra resented that the state’s legislators had passed a religious liberty bill “allowing counselors to refer patients to other counselors if they disagree with a patient’s lifestyle,” according to The Daily News in Memphis.
And so just because he disliked their law, Becerra felt he had the right to impose his will on them via blackmail.
What he neglected to consider before moving forward with his outrageous ban, though, is that the legislators in Tennessee have a zero tolerance policy toward leftist totalitarians.
What he neglected to consider before moving forward with his outrageous ban, though, is that the legislators in Tennessee have a zero tolerance policy toward leftist totalitarians.
Enter the state’s Senate, which in February introduced a scathing resolution condemning California for its bullying tactics.
Dubbed Senate Joint Resolution 111, the stunning bill was signed into law by Gov. Bill Haslam on May 4.
The gist of it was quite simple: The resolution urged the governor, the state House and the state Senate to ban state-funded travel to states that first imposed bans on them, so that those states would “feel the pain and not Tennessee.”
“BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we urge the other forty-eight states to refrain from imposing their unfounded moral judgment on their sister states as California has done in order to prevent escalating foolishness,” the resolution further added.
The resolution also slammed California for its “exorbitant taxes, spiraling budget deficits, runaway social welfare programs, and rampant illegal immigration.”
The best part was the snark contained in this delectable line: “Tennessee is pleasantly surprised that California will not be sending its economic development teams to Tennessee to recruit our businesses.”
Not that business-friendly Tennessee would have had to worry anyway. Businesses have been fleeing Californial eft and right over the past couple of years due to its anti-business laws. And the exodus out of the leftist state is expected to only grow worse as it further hikes its taxes and imposes even more regulations on small businesses.
The state of Tennessee has fired back at California's travel ban of TN, TX, AL, KY & KS. Official resolution:
Instead of waking up and growing a brain, however, California’s leaders continue to double down on stupid, according to a report in The Washington Post.
“While the California DOJ works to protect the rights of all our people, discriminatory laws in any part of our country send all of us several steps back,” Becerra said in a statement last week after he added even more states to his totalitarian ban. “That’s why when California said we would not tolerate discrimination against LGBTQ members of our community, we meant it.”
So be it. Frankly, who would want anything to do with California in the first place? From harboring illegal immigrants to driving away businesses and even attempting to impeach President Donald Trump, the state has demonstrated that it doesn’t want much to do with the great experiment-turned success known as America.
In that case, I got two words for it: Buh-bye!
REPORT: After Phoenix Dropped Sanctuary City Status, Crime Rate Fell
Photo: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Video Screenshot
by BOB PRICE
When the City of Phoenix ended its sanctuary city status crime began to fall, the Arizona Police Association reports. Their statement contrasts sharply with politically motivated chiefs of police from around the country.
“When we eliminated our sanctuary policy back in 2008, we saw crime, violent and stolen vehicles fall by 25 percent,” former Phoenix police officer and Executive Director of the Arizona Police Association Levi Bolton told Fox News Channel’s William La Jeunesse in an interview. “We saw a 20-year low crime rate. When we were allowed and had the discretion to contact our federal immigration partners, crime fell drastically.”
Lajeunesse reported data from City-Data.com revealing that from 2008 to 2009, the murder rate in Phoenix dropped by 27 percent. Other crimes fell as well. Auto thefts fell by 36 percent, robberies 23 percent, thefts by 19 percent, burglaries by 14 percent, and assaults by 13 percent, the report states. The rates fell again in 2010, but by smaller numbers. The overall crime index fell by 20 percent the first year after the city’s policy change.
Police chiefs around the country tout that sanctuary cities are safer than cities that actually turn criminal aliens over to immigration officials for removal from the country.
“Police chiefs across the nation believe that enlisting local police to enforce immigration law is a bad idea,” California Senate President Pro Tem Kevin De Leon (D) told reporters during a recent press conference “Having [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] pluck criminals out of jail and send them across the border or wherever they came only to come right back endangers our communities.”
The University of California, Riverside, disagrees. A 2016 study by the university revealed that “violent crime is slightly higher in sanctuary cities.” It concluded there is not a “discernible difference in violent crime rates, rape, or property crime” across the 55 cities in their study, La Jeunesse reported.
Bob Price serves as associate editor and political senior news contributor for Breitbart Texas. He is a founding member of the Breitbart Texas team. Follow him on Twitter @BobPriceBBTX and Facebook.
The crazies continue to try to oust Trump
Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland showed his loonier side this week as he began circulating legislation to remove President Donald Trump as president via the 25th Amendment.
Here we go again with this embarrassing nonsense.
Let's see, they already tried recounts, tried to hijack the Electoral College (Trump's margin over Hillary widened after that), tried to blame Russia, and lastly tried the Emoluments Clause.
After this, then what?
I shudder to think.
A Democratic congressman has proposed convening a special committee of psychiatrists and other doctors whose job would be to determine if President Donald Trump is fit to serve in the Oval Office.
Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin, who also teaches constitutional law at American University, has predictably failed to attract any Republicans to his banner.
But the U.S. Constitution's 25th Amendment does allow for a majority of the president's cabinet, or 'such other body as Congress may by law provide,' to decide if an Oval Office occupant is unable to carry out his duties – and then to put it to a full congressional vote.
Vice President Mike Pence would also have to agree, which could slow down the process – or speed it up if he wanted the levers of power for himself.
But the U.S. Constitution's 25th Amendment does allow for a majority of the president's cabinet, or 'such other body as Congress may by law provide,' to decide if an Oval Office occupant is unable to carry out his duties – and then to put it to a full congressional vote.
Vice President Mike Pence would also have to agree, which could slow down the process – or speed it up if he wanted the levers of power for himself.
The 25th Amendment has been around since shortly after the John F. Kennedy assassination, but Congress has never formed its own committee in case it's needed to judge a president's mental health.
Speaking of mental health, Democrats need a check-up from the neck up. They still refuse to accept the will of the people.
Obama Caught Telling This Massive Lie About Voter Fraud
Donald Trump’s claim he lost the popular vote because of millions of illegal votes rocked Washington.
Barack Obama responded by calling voter fraud “fake news”.
But one arrest just changed everything.
After Trump raised the specter of illegal aliens providing Hillary Clinton her popular vote margin, liberals shrieked in horror.
Obama blasted the allegations in a press conference as “fake news.”
Politico reports:
“Obama, speaking with reporters in the White House briefing room, grew animated when he discussed voting rights, warning that more recent restrictions on ballot access, like voter ID laws that critics charge are racist because they disproportionately affect minorities and young people, have their roots in the era of Jim Crow.
America must “make it easier, not harder” for people to vote, he argued, and the restrictions, anyway, make no sense.
“This whole notion of voting fraud — this is something that has constantly been disproved. This is fake news,” Obama said emphatically. “The notion that there are a whole bunch of people out there who are going out there and are not eligible to vote and want to vote. We have the opposite problem. We have a whole bunch of people who are eligible to vote who don’t vote, and so the idea that we put in place, the idea of a whole bunch of barriers to people voting, doesn’t make sense.”
But recent events have proven Obama to be a liar.
A James Madison University student was arrested in Virginia after registering dead people to vote.
The Daily Caller reports:
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia sentenced on Monday a James Madison University student to at least 100 days in prison for registering names of deceased persons to vote, CBS 6 WTVR reported.
Andrew J. Spiels worked for a Democrat-affiliated organization known as Harrisonburg Votes at the time he committed the crime, according to acting United States Attorney Rick A. Mountcastle .
“In July 2016 Spieles’ job was to register as many voters as possible and reported to Democratic Campaign headquarters in Harrisonburg,” a U.S. Attorney’s Office spokesperson told CBS6. “In August 2016, Spieles was directed to combine his registration numbers with those of another individual because their respective territories overlapped. After filling out a registration form for a voter, Spieles entered the information into a computer system used by the Virginia Democratic Party to track information such as name, age, address and political affiliation. Every Thursday an employee/volunteer hand-delivered the paper copies of the registration forms to the Registrar’s Office in Harrisonburg.”
Spieles’ scheme was uncovered when an employee at the county registrar’s office recognized one of the names he submitted as having passed away.
This is the second major voting fraud scandal in Virginia.
An investigation found thousands of noncitizens on the commonwealth’s voting rolls.
The Washington Times reports:
“When Virginia Delegate Robert Marshall asked the state’s 133 local governments to provide numbers on noncitizens and jury pools, Loudoun County produced some hefty figures.
Between 2009 and 2014, the Washington, D.C., exurb of more than 350,000 residents had disqualified more than 9,000 of them for jury duty because they were not U.S. citizens.
Loudoun County jury pools come from two sources — voter registration lists and Department of Motor Vehicle driver’s license applications. The county’s 9,000 juror disqualifications means that a potentially significant number of noncitizens vote illegally in Virginia. It suggests a basis for President Trump’s assertion of illegal immigrants voting in November’s elections, though not necessarily by the “millions” he has claimed.
After Mr. Marshall, Prince William Republican, had collected the jury pool data in 2014, a new player entered the state last year. The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) began canvassing election clerks county by county, city by city, demanding they turn over information on noncitizens purged from voters lists and whether they had voted.
The foundation found itself in a stiff battle with Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s elections chief, who, PILF said, did not want to turn over voter information. In October PILF issued its first report, accusing the state of a “cover up” as “thousands” of non citizens illegally remain on Virginia’s voting rolls.
Citing data from six counties and two cities, the report found that 1,000 non citizens were registered to vote in those jurisdictions between 2011 and 2016, and that 200 of them actually voted.”
Is voter fraud “fake news?” You can bet your sweet bippy it is.
Fox News Guest Just Let The Cat Out Of The Bag On The Sanders Investigation
While the mainstream media peddle the narrative that Russia cost Hillary Clinton the White House and that President Donald Trump colluded with Russian President Vladimir Putin to win the election, Fox News has sounded the alarm on what the media aren’t telling voters about certain prominent leftists.
Christopher Bedford, editor-in-chief of The Daily Caller, said on Fox & Friends on Monday that the investigation of Jane Sanders, wife of former Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Bernie Sanders, began in 2015, yet the mainstream media have refused to cover it accordingly.
On Monday morning, the Fox & Friends panel ran a segment on how Sen. Sanders, I-Vt., and Jane Sanders, are currently under FBI investigation regarding a bank loan Jane Sanders received in order to expand Burlington College while she was its president.
“Sen. Sanders’ top adviser, Jeff Weaver, told CBS News the couple has sought legal protection over federal agents’ allegations from a January 2016 complaint accusing then-president of Burlington College, Ms. Sanders, of distorting donor levels in a 2010 loan application for $10 million from People’s United Bank to purchase 33 acres of land for the institution,” Politico reports.
Politico also reported that prosecutors are looking into whether Sen. Sanders’ office used its power to pressure the bank to approve the loan for his wife.
Bedford told Fox & Friends that the news isn’t really new.
“We first reported on this in 2015 at The Daily Caller News Foundation,” Bedford said, “and it’s been slowly rumbling up, and now the FBI has been pushed to investigate whether or not Bernie Sanders’ wife, Jane Sanders, took out a loan based on donations she had to Burlington College.”
“(The donations), it turned out, didn’t actually exist. And it’s actually a question of whether Bernie Sanders’ Senate office pushed them to it. And because of that, there is no more Burlington College,” Bedford said.
“The loan from the Catholic Church and the loan from the bank were lost by the college,” Bedford said, apparently referring to the college’s purchase of land from the church. “And now people are looking into it. But you won’t hear about it from almost any news station. Because it doesn’t fit the narrative that people want to push.”
Following Bedford’s comments, Fox News ran a clip showing Sen. Sanders avoiding questions from a Fox News reporter on Monday when he was asked about the investigation.
The reporter asked Sanders if he believed the investigation of his wife was “politically motivated.”
“Well, I’m glad that you’re interested in the fact that the Republican leadership is proposing legislation which would throw millions of people off of health insurance,” Sanders said as he avoided the question.
While the media have done everything they can to implicate Trump in some sort of wrongdoing, the truth is that the politicians actually under criminal investigation are three top Democrats: Bernie Sanders, Loretta Lynch and Hillary Clinton.
G’day…Ciao…….Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2017/07/httpift_3.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment