Title :
link :
http://ift.tt/2ihVQGgT. CO
Fri., Sept.15, 2017
~All Gave Some~Some Gave All~ God Bless America~
Catholic, Latin America, Poland Experts: ‘Bannon’s Comments Gave Cardinal Dolan Heartburn Because Bannon’s Right’
AP/Dan Fleuette by Raheem Kassam
“Bannon’s comments gave Cardinal [Dolan] heartburn because Bannon’s right,” Dr. Christopher Manion, a Catholic writer and Knight of Malta with over 50 years experience in Latin American issues tells me.
Eyebrows — mostly those of Charlie Rose — were raised when the Breitbart News Executive Chairman was heard to utter criticisms of Catholic leaders on the subject of immigration and the Deferred Action on Childhood Migrants.
Dr. Manion expands: “The Catholic Catechism (N. 2241.2) says that immigration policy belongs with ‘political authorities’, not bishops. Good Catholics can disagree with bishops on immigration, and Bannon does.
“Cardinal Dolan says he’s insulted because Bannon mentions money. Well, the bishops get a billion dollars a year from the federal government. That’s real money, even in D.C., and if the bishops think they’re getting it because they’re such good guys – well, they’re the only folks in Washington who are.”
“Cardinal Dolan says he’s insulted because Bannon mentions money. Well, the bishops get a billion dollars a year from the federal government. That’s real money, even in D.C., and if the bishops think they’re getting it because they’re such good guys – well, they’re the only folks in Washington who are.”
The issue hasn’t escaped the attention of one of the major players in the immigration debate which also happens to be a majority Catholic nation: Poland.
Marek Jan Chodakiewicz — a Polish-American historian who served a 5-year term on the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council — appears to concur with Dr. Manion.
“The Catholic leaders lead no more, except to repeat the mantras of their counterparts elsewhere in the West. Meanwhile, the grassroots see clearly where kumbaya theories, e.g. open borders, lead to,” Chodakiewicz tells Breitbart London.
Poland is perhaps one of the most relevant countries in this debate, as Scott Greer at the Daily Caller elucidated in the immediate aftermath of Bannon’s comments.
The Christian nation has robustly and roundly rejected the European Union’s demands for the country to take tens of thousands of migrants — Muslim migrants.
This is where the difference between the argument in the U.S. and the Poles comes in. Could the approach be as simple as a realization that immigrants could fill the pews of U.S. Catholic Churches in decline?
“Today the bishops’ number one issue is not abortion – it’s amnesty for illegal aliens,” says Dr. Manion. “Here again, Bannon embarrasses them.
“The Pew Trust says that thirty million Catholics have left the pews. Who’s going to fill them? Archbishop José Gómez of Los Angeles, the bishops’ point man on amnesty, is blunt: Hispanics should fill them. Most are Catholic and hold “deep conservative values,” he says. Apparently the Americans who oppose amnesty are selfish racists. One bishop actually calls them ‘Pharisees and hypocrites’.”
“America’s Catholic bishops want what Gómez calls ‘the Next America’ – a Hispanic one”.
“America’s Catholic bishops want what Gómez calls ‘the Next America’ – a Hispanic one”.
It’s likely this is another — including the monetary elements mentioned earlier — constituent factor behind the bishops’ support for DACA, and the opposition to the economic nationalism and strong border policies espoused by Bannon.
But there’s another part of this not-so-holy trinity. Politics, of course.
“Look, the bishops expected Hillary to win,” explains Dr. Manion. “Obama gave them hundreds of millions a year to care for immigrants and illegals and refugees, and Hillary would have kept the party going. With Trump, a drop in illegals and refugees means a drop in funding, it’s that simple”.
Chodakiewicz sheds light on how these issues play out not just in the United States, but in Europe too.
“The Church globally is in disarray; let your communications be yeah, yeah, nay, nay seems no longer to apply. That is a global trend.
“[The] good news is that in Poland at the grass roots, the parish clergy stays true to the mission. It believes in One, Holy, Catholic Church. And so do its followers. Therefore there is no way they will agree to what they see as the primacy of relativistic liberalism [and] a Muslim invasion to dominate Christendom.
“So in their churches they continue to preach the Truth. The priests, nuns, and their spiritual cares comment widely upon the pathologies afflicting the West, including Marxism-Lesbianism and, yes, Muslim migrants. Most Poles want neither.”
He’s right. Even Polish Muslims (Tatars) who have been in the country since the 14th century roundly reject the idea of mass migration.
According to the Public Religion Research Institute, while 77 percent of Hispanic Catholics favor a route to citizenship for illegal immigrants, a lower 55 percent of white Catholics believe the same.
Add this to the news that 64 per cent of white Catholics believe “American culture and way of life has changed for the worse since 1950s, while 62 percent of Latino Catholics say American culture has changed for the better since the 1950s,” and you start to see the Church’s problem.
Add this to the news that 64 per cent of white Catholics believe “American culture and way of life has changed for the worse since 1950s, while 62 percent of Latino Catholics say American culture has changed for the better since the 1950s,” and you start to see the Church’s problem.
They are dealing with a congregation that is fundamentally fissured, and it’s almost like they’re having to choose which group to side with, and which group to lecture and/or alienate.
Cardinal Dolan’s response to Stephen K. Bannon — that his remarks were “insulting” — was an obvious attempt to dodge the wider issue.
As Dr. Manion says: “…Cardinal Dolan’s remark… carefully does not deny what Bannon said. In fact, Dolan admitted the silence to the Wall Street Journal – he said bishops had “laryngitis” on the magisterial teaching.
“Bannon is exactly right,” he says. “The immigration crusade is not ‘magisterial’ – and the bishops don’t preach what is magisterial”.
Raheem Kassam is the editor in chief of Breitbart London and author of No Go Zones: How Shariah Law is Coming to a Neighborhood Near You
More on Bannon the Barbarian as he Conquers “60 Minutes” by Chuck Muth
If you missed the recent “60 Minutes” interrogation of Steve Bannon, head of Breitbart News and adviser to President Donald Trump, you missed a lot – including CBS’ shameful camera antics which were clearly intended to cast Mr. Bannon in the worst possible light imaginable.
Interviewer Charlie Rose’s hostile grilling was as expected as it was obnoxious. But it didn’t deter Bannon from getting his points across; points of extreme interest to Trump loyalists and the GOP conservative base. Some highlights…
* The Republican Party establishment has been taking actions to undermine the Trump presidency in an effort to “nullify the 2016 election.” This is true. And we Trump-supporting “rubes” in the heartland know it.
* Leading those efforts have been Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan. It fact, it comes as no surprise whatsoever that McConnell objected to the very notion of “draining the swamp” and wanted the Trump campaign to “back off” from using it.
* Republicans who are openly trying to sabotage the Trump presidency will be targeted for defeat in GOP primaries next year, with Bannon leading many of such efforts. And that could well include Danny Tarkanian’s challenge to Sen. Dean Heller right here in Nevada.
* President Trump’s early decision to embrace the GOP establishment right after his election – including a number of key administration appointments – was an understandable gesture that, in hindsight, was a mistake.
* The Republican majority in Congress is responsible for the failures to enact the campaign promises the GOP ran on in 2016, not President Trump. They’ve had seven years to prepare for a Republican president in the White House who would sign their legislation, but have failed to get their promises to the Oval Office desk.
* The Republican majority, given six months to do its job as it relates to DACA, is likely to screw that up at least as badly as they’ve screwed up ObamaCare repeal. And that failure could well cost the GOP its majority in both houses in November 2018.
* White hate-mongers such as the KKK’s David Duke aren’t getting increased visibility because of President Trump, but because the fake news media keeps putting them on the air despite the fact that they are a very tiny, though repulsive, part of our citizenry.
* The Russian collusion story is “a waste of time” and is only fueled by the fake news industry that has dedicated itself to destroying the Trump presidency. Most of the American people know this to be absolutely true.
In addition, most of us agree with Bannon that what President Trump “does on Twitter is extraordinary.” He talks directly to the American people without the filter of the “pearl-clutching mainstream media” getting in the way.
And then there was this quote: “Hillary Clinton's not very bright."
PolitiFact: True. As it turns out, the mainstream media’s portrayal of her as the smartest woman in the world is perhaps the biggest fake news story of the 21st century…so far.
Cheers.
Dr. Chuck Muth, PsD
Professor of Psephology (homeschooled)
Nevada’s #1 Irritator of Liberals and RINOs
Professor of Psephology (homeschooled)
Nevada’s #1 Irritator of Liberals and RINOs
The Lies Being Told About The Death Of Eric Chase Bolling Jr.
The headlines blared the "news."
"Eric Bolling Jr. died emotionally wrecked by his father’s Fox News scandal, report says," screamed The Mercury News.
"ERIC CHASE BOLLING, JR.DIED IN BED After Suffering 'Emotional Torture'," yelled TMZ.
"Eric Bolling's Son Struggled With The Fired Fox News Host's Sexual Harassment Scandal Just Before His Untimely Death," PerezHilton.com screeched.
The headlines — all from far-left publications — of course made their way into the mainstream media. Why else would a 19-year-old young man have died just hours after his father had been forced out of Fox News following allegations that he texted photos of his privates to several women?
That's the story the media wanted, but as is so often the case, it's not rooted in reality.
No one yet knows the cause of death for young Eric — the coroner hasn't issued a report. An autopsy has been completed but the results won't be known for up to eight weeks. This much is known: He was found in bed in what was reported as a "normal position" under the covers. There was no suicide note. And there were no bottles of pills — or any drug paraphernalia — in his apartment near the University of Colorado Boulder, where he was studying economics in his second year.
But Eric's cause of death was immediately reported by some news outlets as suicide, which forced his father — in his utmost grief — to have to post on Twitter that "authorities have informed us there is no sign of self harm at this point."
And, also of course, you haven't read much about this since Eric's death occurred. But reporters — like, actually reporters, the ones who go out there, talk to people, gather facts — got to work and have written some interesting stories since his death.
Days after the death of former Fox News host Eric Bolling's son, one of the college student's friends is pushing back on a story claiming that he was emotionally distressed over publicity about his father. ...
A female friend who spoke on the condition of anonymity, disputed that account, however, telling local news outlet DailyCamera.com that Bolling was "proud" of his father.
"He lived life to the fullest," she reportedly said. "He was your average college student. Just an awesome guy."
The friend went on to say that Bolling frequently talked about his father and his job at Fox News. She said Eric Jr. was grateful to his dad for the life he gave him, according to the report.
The news organization cited by NJ.com, the DailyCamera.com, also reported that Eric's friend "said what has made her friend's death harder has been the negative comments and speculation online. Even Bolling's Facebook page on Monday had comments mocking him and his father."
"'I understand his dad was fired,' she said. 'But me and my friends are so pissed off at social media.'"
"He would always talk about his dad being on Fox News," she said.
"It's not like I really cared, since I just wanted to be his friend. But he talked about it, and he was proud of his dad. He said he had the life that he had due to his father." ...
'That's not the Eric we know," she said. "Yes, he cared about his dad, but he was a strong man. He'd faced adversity before and he always came back stronger than ever before."
But still, nobody knows anything. And they won't for weeks.
The Five, on which Bolling Sr. was a co-host, paid tribute to him on Monday.
“[The Bollings] are in our prayers and the prayers of the entire Fox News family,” co-host Kimberly Guilfoyle said. “Eric Chase brought so much love and joy to his parents’ life. If you watched our show over the years, you probably heard Eric proudly talk about his sweet son, who was a baseball player like his dad, playing left field.”
Eric Bolling Sr. was a loving dad and his son as a wonderful young man. That much is certain.
Multiple Democrats Currently Involved In Child Sex Scandals
Democratic Seattle Mayor Ed Murray resigned Tuesday after more allegations of child sexual abuse surfaced in what is becoming a disturbing pattern of Democratic politicians involved in crimes and allegations of child sexual abuse — scandals largely ignored by the media.
Murray’s resignation, effective 5 p.m. on Wednesday, comes after a fifth allegation of child sexual abuse surfaced on Tuesday — this time from a family member.
However, Murray’s alleged behavior is not alone; several major Democrats are facing charges or received convictions regarding sexual crimes related to children over the past year.
Perhaps the most well-known example is that of Anthony Weiner, soon to be ex-husband to Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin.
The disgraced Democratic politician has a long history of sexual misconduct which most recently landed him in legal trouble when he became involved in an online sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl. Weiner pleaded guilty to transferring obscene material to a minor and faces up to ten years in prison — he also must now register as a sex offender.
Jacob Schwartz, 29, was an up-and-coming young Democrat who worked on New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s staff until he was arrested in May on child pornography charges in which he allegedly kept more than 3,000 images and 89 videos of pornographic acts committed by children.
Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) is currently on trial facing federal corruption charges, which started in 2012 over allegations that he and another man were having sex with underage prostitutes.
The co-owners of backpage.com, a website allegedly directly linked to child prostitution and trafficking, gave lots of money to Democrats recently, including donations to:
-
David Garcia — a Democratic candidate for governor in Arizona
Convicted sex offender and longtime friend of former Democratic President Bill Clinton, Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, was accused in January in a federal lawsuit of luring a woman into “his elaborate sex trafficking enterprise,” the Daily Mail reported. “The lawsuit alleges that Epstein had a compulsive sexual preference for little girls as young as 13-years-old.”
Last week, Democratic Connecticut Councilman Scott Chamberlain was forced to step down after photographs of him allegedly emerged on a private website for “furries,” a weird subculture of people who dress up in furry costumes for sexual gratification.
SO NOT HOT: Sports Illustrated Posting Bikini Shots On Hurricane Ravaged Beaches
“People in the Virgin Islands are running out of fuel, water and food."
Talk about insensitive! As people rebuild their homes lost in the wake of Hurricane Irma, the people behind the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue have been posting bikini shots of sexy models on beaches affected by the hurricane.
According to Page Six, the famed sports magazine posted photos of the "Brooklyn Nets cheerleaders posing in bikinis in the Caribbean — which was slammed by Hurricane Irma last week."
The shoot for their 2018 calendar took place in Barbados, where the British army is coordinating relief efforts. If that's not bad enough, just days before, the team "posted topless shots of a model taken by a pool in Houston" where recovery efforts continue in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey.
Sports Illustrated has not commented on the matter, but one reader called the shots "incredibly shameless and inappropriate given the devastation in Texas and the Caribbean.”
To illustrate just how bad these areas have been ravaged, former SI cover star, Virgin Islands resident Hannah Jeter, is on hand to provide the details: “People in the Virgin Islands are running out of fuel, water and food. People are dying!!! People are lost!!!! We are an afterthought and are not getting the help that we need!!! . . . This is an emergency!!!!!”
Not the time for posting half-naked pics on beaches just miles away from people fighting for survival.
Sarah Huckabee Drops Comey Crime Bombshell On Live TV
Ousting former FBI Director James Comey may not have been the best move (from a political standpoint), but it was the best move — from a justice perspective.
In the latest White House press briefing, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders accused fired FBI Director James Comey of providing false testimony to Congress.
When asked by a reporter if it was a wise political decision to fire James Comey, Sarah Huckabee said it was, and explained that Comey was fired for a number of reasons, including: “giving false testimony, leaking privileged information to journalists, he went outside of the chain of command and politicized an investigation into a presidential candidate.”
Former FBI Director James Comey was fired by President Trump on May 9, 2017. There are plenty of reasons to justify the ousting of the FBI Director, who only served four years of his ten-year term.
A series of memos written by President Trump, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein circulated around the White House in the lead-up to Comey’s dismissal. The memos outlined the administration’s reasoning for Comey’s firing, and highlighted ways in which the FBI’s reputation suffered under the former director.
President Trump released a memo informing James Comey that he had been “terminated and removed from office, effective immediately.” In the memo, he also highlighted his reasons for ousting Comey, and referred to memos written by Sessions and Rosenstein for further justification.
President Trump was upset with Comey because the FBI Director refused to admit publicly that Trump was not under investigation for Russian collusion. “While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation,” Trump wrote, chastising Comey.
However, the final decision to fire Comey was based on Comey’s botched treatment of the Hillary Clinton email investigation. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein explained that Comey broke long-standing Justice Department rules when he personally decided not to press charges against Clinton. James Comey, he said, “Announced his own conclusions about the nation’s most sensitive criminal investigation, without the authorization of duly appointed Justice Department leaders.”
As noted by Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee, evidence has emerged that reinforces Comey’s firing. Huckabee specifically mentions false testimony, and the leaking information to the press.
Just before the 2016 presidential election, FBI Director Comey was dragged before the House Judiciary Committee to answer questions about the atypical Clinton email investigation. Representative John Ratcliffe (R-TX) asked Comey if he made the decision to not press charges on Clinton before or after he interviewed her.
DHS Bans Use of Kaspersky Lab Software in US Government
REUTERS/Sergei Karpukhin
By: James Rogers
The Department of Homeland Security has instructed federal agencies and departments to stop using products from Moscow-based cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab.
Officials say that the prominent company poses a threat to U.S. national security and have given government agencies and departments 90 days to get rid of Kaspersky Lab software.
“The Department is concerned about the ties between certain Kaspersky officials and Russian intelligence and other government agencies, and requirements under Russian law that allow Russian intelligence agencies to request or compel assistance from Kaspersky and to intercept communications transiting Russian networks,” DHS officials said, in a statement on the “Binding Operational Directive” to agencies and departments. “The risk that the Russian government, whether acting on its own or in collaboration with Kaspersky, could capitalize on access provided by Kaspersky products to compromise federal information and information systems directly implicates U.S. national security,” it added.
The DHS is instructing departments and agencies to identify any use Kaspersky products on their information systems in the next 30 days and to develop detailed plans to remove the software in the next 60 days. Unless directed otherwise by DHS based on new information, agencies and departments have 90 days from the date of the directive to discontinue use of Kaspersky Lab products.
The directive suggests the U.S. government puts some credence in reports that the popular antivirus company, and its founder Eugene Kaspersky, have close ties to Russian intelligence services.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H, has been pushing to prohibit the federal government from using the firm’s products. In a New York Times column earlier this month, Shaheen warned that the company poses a danger to U.S. security.
In a statement, DHS echoed this sentiment Wednesday. “The risk that the Russian government, whether acting on its own or in collaboration with Kaspersky, could capitalize on access provided by Kaspersky products to compromise federal information and information systems directly implicates U.S. national security,” it said.
However, DHS is also providing Kaspersky Lab an opportunity to tell its side of the story via a written response to the Department’s concerns. “The Department wants to ensure that the company has a full opportunity to inform the Acting Secretary of any evidence, materials, or data that may be relevant,” it said. “This opportunity is also available to any other entity that claims its commercial interests will be directly impacted by the directive.”
In a statement sent to Fox News, Kaspersky Lab denied any involvement with the Russian government. “Given that Kaspersky Lab doesn’t have inappropriate ties with any government, the company is disappointed with the decision by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), but also is grateful for the opportunity to provide additional information to the agency in order to confirm that these allegations are completely unfounded,” it said. “No credible evidence has been presented publicly by anyone or any organization as the accusations are based on false allegations and inaccurate assumptions, including claims about the impact of Russian regulations and policies on the company.”
Security expert Alex Hamerstone said the U.S. government’s decision could have widespread implications. “This wasn't an easy action for the US government to take, and it will also have significant ramifications for corporations that use Kaspersky,” explained Hamerstone, who is the Practice Lead for the Governance, Risk, and Compliance division at security consultant TrustedSec. “Many of those companies will now feel compelled to go through their systems and remove this antivirus program, as well as conduct a risk assessment.”
Earlier this week, retailer Best Buy said it would stop selling Kaspersky software for the time being. In a tweet, Kaspersky Lab said that the two companies have “suspended” their relationship, which they said may be “re-evaluated” in the future.
Michael Borohovski, co-founder of Tinfoil Security, told Fox News that he wasn’t surprised by the Department of Homeland Security’s move. “The U.S. government has been looking at Kaspersky for years, so this announcement is no real surprise to anyone. In fact, the GSA pulled Kaspersky from its list of pre-approved vendors back in July,” he said, noting U.S. fears about potential cyber espionage. “The US has aired similar concerns about other companies, like Chinese telecom company Huawei, which is currently banned from entering the US network equipment market.”
Huawei, however, does sell phones in the U.S. consumer market.
Yes, Pope Francis, President Trump IS Pro-Life
By Deal Hudson
It saddens me that Pope Francis refuses to recognize the pro-life intentions and actions of President Trump. The president has made good on his promises to pro-life voters, starting on his first day in office with his restoration of the Mexico City Policy, which he later expanded. Federal funds can no longer pay for abortions overseas. And there is more, not the least of which is the presence of Justice Neil Gorsuch on the U.S. Supreme Court.
But rather than applauding the president’s actions, Pope Francis has attempted to co-opt the meaning of “pro-life” to include his preferred immigration policies. Speaking to reporters on his flight back to Rome from Colombia, the pope was asked about the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), which the president had ordered phased out in six months. “I hope they rethink it a bit,” the pontiff said, “Because I heard the U.S. president speak: He presents himself as a person who is pro-life.”
There are so many things wrong about this, it’s hard to know where to begin. We might note what Trump said about DACA when he announced his decision: He explicitly gave Congress six months to find a legislative solution, adding if Congress did not act he would revisit the issue himself. The president clearly does not intend to send “Dreamers” out of the United States, but does not want to act unilaterally as President Obama did in June 2012. Pope Francis ignored the president’s stated intention. In addition, DACA is a nullity, born of an unconstitutional assertion of executive power by Obama. The U.S. Supreme Court eventually would have struck it down.
Then there is the doctrinal problem with what Pope Francis said: He effectively used a prudential matter—immigration policy—to override a matter of settled moral teaching—prohibition of abortion. In prudential matters, Catholics are free to come to different solutions based on general principles. “Welcome the stranger,” the Church teaches. But how a nation chooses to welcome strangers does not require open borders. The Church also teaches that a nation’s leader has a duty to protect all citizens. The pope, it must be said, got the issues backward.
In saying to the press, the “family is the cradle of life and one must defend its unity,” Pope Francis clearly stated the Church’s teaching. But, once again, how a nation defends the family is a prudential matter—except when it comes to taking the life of the unborn. This “seamless garment” logic always has a way of discounting the importance of protecting innocent human life from the harm of the abortionist. When you link the pro-life question with entirely unrelated issues, such as immigration policy, you’re necessarily weakening the pro-life cause. You’re telling pro-abortion politicians they can get a pass with the right immigration policies. And you’re telling pro-life politicians that their support doesn’t count if they don’t have the right immigration policies. That’s how pro-abortion politicians get away with it, and the Pope has encouraged them with his remarks.
How the life and death of an innocent baby could be equated in moral importance with prudential questions surrounding domestic policies made no sense to millions of observant Catholics, nor to Saint John Paul II. These were the Catholics who helped to elect the pro-life Ronald Reagan and who would also choose George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush, and Donald Trump over their Democratic opponents.
The connection between both Bushes and Pope John II was a powerful one that, for a season, consolidated for the first time in U.S. history a political coalition of Catholics and Evangelicals. That coalition was pronounced dead during the eight years of the Obama presidency but came back to life when faced with a choice between a hardened pro-abortion advocate and a businessman whose pro-life convictions were stated but untested. That candidate, Donald Trump, has done all he could possibly do during his first nine months in office to keep live up to the pro-life label. Yet the leader of the Catholic Church chooses to question the president’s commitment to protecting life while ignoring his intention regarding the Dreamers. Even more, Pope Francis in questioning the president’s pro-life convictions is implicitly questioning the pro-life sincerity of all those Catholics who voted for Trump and support his policies.
This can hardly be called a teaching moment in the papacy of Pope Francis. Rather by his comments to the reporters, the Holy Father has given the pro-abortion liberal wing a club to beat the pro-life conservatives. It won’t wash with active and committed Catholics who have seen through the double-talk of the seamless garment rhetoric and applaud President Trump for all he has done, and will do, to protect innocent life.
G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2017/09/httpift_14.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment