Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.
BLOGSPOT.COM
Saturday, Apr. 14, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****Politics a
As with all conflicts the key question always is, was this action the end of the beginning or the end of the beginning. The Russians won't back down. They can not and will not. Assad is just a blotch on the tapestry of history. The chess game is between Trump and Putin.
The Russian ruler is merely a continuation of a succession of czars and commissars. a successor of Joseph Stalin and his band of blood thirsty criminals. Trump is our reluctant warrior.
Last night was just round one of what could grow into a protracted confrontation.
Trump holds most of the cards and Putin has his back against the wall.
While our economy is accelerating, Russia's is collapsing.
If our leaders have the testicular fortitude to support our military's effort here we could end the threat of tin pot dictators the world over. If we slither away they will be energized to persevere and civilization as we know it would be threatened.
Tomorrow (Saturday) we will attempt to analyze all this together.
Say a prayer for our troops (and those of England and France).
Ciao........Moe and Helen Lauzier
GUESS WHO HAS THE BEST RECORD IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE? YEA!!! RED SOX
Syrian Citizens Have an Extremely Telling Response to US Missile Strikes
BY CILLIAN ZEAL
In the wake of the allied missile strikes on chemical weapon facilities in Syria on Saturday morning, the main questions seemed to be what Russia’s response would be and whether or not the missile attacks signaled a deepening role for the United States in the complicated civil war in Syria.
One question that wasn’t oft addressed, however, was how everyday Syrians responded to the strikes against the Assad regime.
Fox News‘ Hollie McKay was on the ground inside Syria and collected reactions from some of the residents there. While emotions were mixed, the general mood seemed to be in favor of the strike on three Syrian chemical weapons facilities.
“The explosions were so loud,” Obada Alstof, a 21-year-old opposition activist, told Fox News after the attack.
“We had no idea what was happening but we immediately expected that the international coalition was targeting the regime locations.”
“We hope for the future that strikes will expand to include all the Syrian regime and its supported militias’ military locations,” he added, “because the regime and its allies are committing massacres against the civilians every day.”
Said al-Hamawi, a 20-year-old business student in Damascus, says he saw one of the rockets heading to its target before being shot down by Syrian anti-aircraft guns.
“It exploded in the sky. It was very clear. There were far explosions in the sky, but that was the clearest,” Hamawi told Fox News.
“I hope that this attack will achieve almost Assad’s weapons destruction, which will rid the Syrians civilians of weapons that will be used against them.”
Another Damascus resident was more apprehensive.
“Early morning today, I woke up because of the sound of Syrian anti-aircraft. I did not see the explosions but I heard the sounds,” Zilal Mansour, 33, said.
“These were weaker compared to the sounds of shelling in Al-Ghouta, although I knew that military area near my residential ‘Barza’ was being targeted.”
“I did not feel anything, I was not sad or happy. Assad should be punished,” she added. “But would this strike be like the previous one? Or is it for pressing him for political concessions?”
Some residents said that warnings from the Russians made the strikes less effective than they could have been.
“Assad during the previous days transferred many aircraft and weapons from their places to another one. Most of the targeted areas were empty and only the building has been damaged,” said Damascus resident Ayman Bakla, 53.
“Assad came out on the television a little while ago, going to his office with a message to the world that ‘I am fine and your beating did not affect.’”
Other residents were afraid to speak out of the possibility of retaliation.
“If we know the U.S. will stay here long-term to protect us, it is no problem, we can speak freely,” a resident of Manbij said.
“But until then, we don’t know what will happen. We don’t want to see our people killed in retaliation. The situation is too sensitive.”
Overall, however, one can gather that the mood on the ground is not in favor of Assad, whose murderous regime has laid waste to an entire country during seven abominable years of civil war. The fact that Russia and Iran continue to support the regime is entirely indefensible; if they wish that the people of Syria were to truly know peace, they would withdraw their support from this hideous monster at once. It’s a telling sign that Syrians are fed up with both their government and those who would prop it up.
Nikki Haley Ignites UN Floor with Bombshell Threat Straight from Trump
BY BEN MARQUIS
U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley made it clear during a United Nations Security Council meeting this morning that the United States and its allies stand ready to launch additional attacks on Syria’s chemical weapons capabilities if the regime should decide to use the banned weapons in the future.
“I spoke to the president this morning and he said if the Syrian regime uses this poisonous gas again, the United States is locked and loaded,” Haley said, according to Politico.
“When our president draws a red line, our president enforces the red line,” she added in a not-so-subtle shot at the prior administration.
Haley spent a significant portion of her speech reiterating how Russia has not only aided and abetted Syria’s use of chemical weapons in defiance of international law, but also called them out for how they’ve obstructed UN efforts to ensure such weapons are destroyed and their use curtailed.
She further accused Russia of waging a deliberate disinformation campaign in regard to the suspected chemical weapons attacks that resulted in retaliatory targeted missile strikes, according to The Hill.
“We can all see that a Russia disinformation campaign is in full-force this morning,” Haley stated. “But Russia’s desperate attempts at deflection cannot change the facts.”
“The pictures of dead children were not fake news,” Haley added. “They were the result of the Syrian regime’s barbaric inhumanity. And they were the result of the regime and Russia’s failure to live up to their international commitments to remove all chemical weapons from Syria.”
Ambassador Haley reminded everyone that both Russia and Syria repeatedly assured the international community that they had complied with demands to get rid of chemical weapons in the war-torn nation — a task they obviously failed to achieve, if they even ever tried — and stated bluntly that the U.S. would wage a “sustained” military campaign if necessary to prevent further chemical weapons use by Syria.
President Donald Trump remarked on the precision missile strikes — which included the use of cruise missiles as well as strikes by manned aircraft — and praised the capabilities of the U.S. military in a pair of tweets Saturday morning.
“A perfectly executed strike last night. Thank you to France and the United Kingdom for their wisdom and the power of their fine Military. Could not have had a better result. Mission Accomplished!” Trump tweeted.
A perfectly executed strike last night. Thank you to France and the United Kingdom for their wisdom and the power of their fine Military. Could not have had a better result. Mission Accomplished!
“So proud of our great Military which will soon be, after the spending of billions of fully approved dollars, the finest that our Country has ever had. There won’t be anything, or anyone, even close!” he tweeted moments later.
Moe and Helen note…
Is it even remotely possible to continue our relations with a mad man on a par with Hitler? If Vladimir Putin gets half a chance we'll wonder why the USA didn’t stop him in the same way Roosevelt didn’t do a thing to halt the extermination of 6 million Jews and millions of others by Hitler in WWII. We hope and pray the horror in the Syrian chemical attacks can be permanently eradicates...and soon.
Is it even remotely possible to continue our relations with a mad man on a par with Hitler? If Vladimir Putin gets half a chance we'll wonder why the USA didn’t stop him in the same way Roosevelt didn’t do a thing to halt the extermination of 6 million Jews and millions of others by Hitler in WWII. We hope and pray the horror in the Syrian chemical attacks can be permanently eradicates...and soon.
Hillary Clinton Fantasizes About Her ‘Instrumental’ Role in Irish Peace Process… Again
There she goes again.
That Walter Mitty would-be-world-famous-diplomat who saved the island of Ireland and brought the peace that had eluded its leaders and negotiators for three centuries has come back.
Who are we talking about?
Well, that would be Hillary Clinton, Savior of the Celtic Isle.
It’s hard to believe, but Clinton is once again replaying her make-believe claim that she played an important role in the Irish peace process.
Don’t believe her. It wasn’t true when she made it up years ago and it’s still not true. She didn’t play any role. None at all.
By all accounts, (except her own) Hillary was a bystander who accompanied her husband to Ireland — as any first lady would. But unlike her predecessors, Hillary had fanciful delusions about her own relevance and importance in the historical Irish peace process.
Her easily exposed fibs and exaggerations have been well documented.
The particular lines of lies about Ireland started during her 2008 presidential campaign when Clinton told National Public Radio that she played an “instrumental” role in ending the century’s old “Troubles” between the Irish Catholics and Protestants in order to shore up her involvement in something — anything — outside of domestic policy.
We exposed her growing embellishments in several columns in 2007 and 2008 and showed that it was only Bill and Hillary who believed that she had anything to do with the peace process — and they didn’t recall it when they wrote their multi-million dollar memoirs.
Even the Obama campaign vehemently denied that she had any role whatsoever. After that, she laid low for a while.
But now she’s on the loose again. In an interview at the all-women’s club, The Wing, on April 3, Hillary gratuitously threw in this line:
“I was involved in the Irish peace process and the Good Friday Accord.”
It was a throw-away line. They weren’t discussing Ireland in any way, shape, or form.
What the heck would make her go down that road again?
Just being Hillary! Remember how she landed under sniper fire in Bosnia? Except the imaginary snipers turned out to be innocent little girls handing her bouquets of flowers.
She’d been thoroughly and publicly humiliated by those dedicated public servants who actually did play a role in Ireland. David Trimble, the head of the Northern Ireland delegation who ceaselessly negotiated for peace and shared the Ulster Nobel Peace Prize for the success of the Good Friday Accord, called Hillary’s claim “a wee bit silly.” He said, “I don’t want to rain on the thing for her, but being a cheerleader for something is slightly different from being a principal player.”
Former U.S. George Mitchell, who spent years working for the peace, barely mentioned her in his book, “Making Peace,” saying only that she “encouraged women in Northern Ireland to get involved.” He also confirmed that she wasn’t “directly involved” in the process at all.
And Mitchell never referred to her in his speech at the U.N. when he received the U.N. Peace Prize.
Former IRA leader Gerry Adams, who was publicly legitimized and rehabilitated by Bill Clinton, politely recalled that “I met the senator on many occasions when she was first lady, and subsequently when she became a senator for New York State. I always found her to be extremely well informed on the issues.”
So meeting Gerry Adams and knowing the issues makes one influential in the peace process?
But throughout her campaign for the presidency in 2008, Hillary and Bill Clinton boldly rewrote history, claiming that her success in bringing peace to Ireland was all part of the vast experience that made her qualified for the White House.
What’s really funny is that they both forgot to mention her magical diplomatic skills in their respective best selling memoirs.
How odd that Hillary forgot to mention her pivotal role in Ireland just four years earlier, when she wrote her $8 million memoir, “Living History.” There, she told a very different story.
Her first mention of Ireland was in a discussion of Bill’s October 2004 trip:
The trip highlighted Bill’s milestones in foreign affairs. In addition to his pivotal role in easing the tensions in the Middle East, he was now focusing on the decades Long Troubles in Northern Ireland.” (Emphasis added.)
No memories whatsoever of her own phantom milestone or focus on the Irish “troubles.” With good reason — it didn’t exist.
Ireland next appeared in Hillary’s memoirs in her description of the Clinton’s 1995 visit to Belfast and Dublin. According to Hillary, while Bill met with the “various factions” of Irish politics, she met with women leaders of the peace movement. Rather than discuss the difficulties of the peace process and her isolation from the action, Hillary focused on a teapot used by the women:
“They poured tea from ordinary stainless steel teapots, and when I remarked how well they kept the tea warm, Joyce insisted that I take a pot to remember them by. I used that dented teapot every day in our small family kitchen in the White House…”
Other than describing the women’s fear when their sons left the house and their support for a ceasefire and an end to the violence, Hillary doesn’t cover much policy.
She then describes a visit to Derry to meet John Hume, the charming Nobel Peace Prize winner, where “tens of thousands thronged the streets in the freezing cold to roar approval of Bill and America, and I was filled with pride and respect for my husband.”
After Derry, the Clintons went to Belfast to light the Christmas tree in front of City Hall. Following the ceremony, they attended a reception.
No mention of Hillary’s deep involvement in any part of the peace process.
She must have forgotten in all of the excitement.
She mentions Bill’s speeches and meeting Ted Kennedy’s sister, the Irish president, the U.S. ambassador, and the Nobel Prize winning poet Seamus Heaney. Bono and the Clintons went shopping and tried to trace Bill Clinton’s mother’s genealogy.
Not exactly heavy-duty diplomacy.
Later, she described the setback to the peace process in Omagh, Northern Ireland, where a car bomb killed 28 people and injured hundreds of others, “damaging the peace process that Bill had worked so long and hard to nurture with Irish leaders.” (Emphasis added)
Hillary does recall that in her meetings with women in Ireland, she’d spoken with them about the troubles and how to find a way to “achieve peace and reconciliation.”
Again, she was on the sidelines, the cheerleader that Mitchell recalled. The cheerleader outside that has nothing to do with the game.
Bill’s memoirs are also totally devoid of any memories of any role at all by Hillary in the peace process.
He must have forgotten a lot, too.
Other than the Christmas tree lighting and attending receptions and meeting celebrities — Bono, Seamaus Heaney, etc. — there is nothing substantive about Hillary.
But Bill Clinton later said that an unnamed man had said that Hillary had played “an independent role in the Irish peace process.”
Clinton offered no explanation of who the anonymous man was or what exactly this “independent” role was for Hillary.
But Bill does describe his own role — and Hillary was nowhere to be found:
“Good Friday was one of the happiest days of my presidency. Seventeen hours past the deadline for a decision, all the parties in Northern Ireland agreed to a plan to end 30 years of sectarian violence. I had been up most of the night, trying to help George Mitchell close the deal. Besides George, I talked to Bertie Ahern and Tony Blair, David Trimble, and Gerry Adams twice, before going to bed at 2:30 a.m. At five, George woke me with a request to call Adams again to seal the deal.”
Hillary apparently slept through the night — perhaps dreaming her Walter Mitty dream of delivering the peace agreement single handedly.
But outside in the real world, she continued to be isolated from the important negotiations. When the President of Ireland, Mary Robinson, visited the White House, Hillary was not invited to her Oval Office meeting with the president. Instead, she hosted an informal coffee for Mr. Robinson.
How could they possibly discuss important peace matters without Hillary?
Her claim to any role in the Irish peace process is pure fantasy.
Dick Morris is a former adviser to President Bill Clinton as well as a political author, pollster and consultant. His most recent book, “Rogue Spooks,” was written with his wife, Eileen McGann.
Leaked Emails Show Democrats Expect Trump To Take Drastic Personnel Action in ‘Next 48 Hours’
By Joe Simonson 
Democrats believe President Donald Trump will take action to stop the Russia investigation this weekend and are contacting local organizers around the country to plan protests, leaked emails to The Daily Caller News Foundation show.
Connecticut Democratic Rep. Jim Himes sent an email out to field organizers in Norwalk and other towns in his home state Friday outlining his concerns that the president will fire either Attorney General Jeff Session, FBI Director Rod Rosenstein or special counsel Robert Mueller.
A source connected to the Himes campaign told TheDCNF that the Democrats need “contingency plans” set up in case Trump takes action.
The leaked email, authored personally by Himes, says the congressman believes “that in the next 48 hours, it is more likely than not that the President acts against Attorney General Sessions, Deputy AG Rosenstein, and/or Special Counsel Mueller. His intent will be to end Mueller’s investigation.”
It is not clear how Himes has gotten this impression, but it should not be seen as an effort to drum up the base or as a fundraising effort.
“I have a hard time believing that Jim would send this out without being 85 percent certain” about the firings, the source told TheDCNF.
Himes also writes that he believes it is “likely that the President will order an attack on Syria” this weekend.
“In both cases, constitutional order and rule of law are at stake. As a consequence, it is important that we speak and act in a coordinated manner,” Himes wrote to Connecticut party officials, referencing the need for organizers to begin planning.
In the case of the president ending Mueller’s investigation, Himes told confidants that “Congress must act immediately to require the preservation of all documents and work product, and to re-establish the investigation via statue,” adding that “this must be the sole initial priority.”
As Congress acts, Himes calls for “organized, persistent and peaceful demonstrations with a clear demand must be the goal.”
In the case of the president ending Mueller’s investigation, Himes told confidants that “Congress must act immediately to require the preservation of all documents and work product, and to re-establish the investigation via statue,” adding that “this must be the sole initial priority.”
As Congress acts, Himes calls for “organized, persistent and peaceful demonstrations with a clear demand must be the goal.”
Democrats are organizing protests in small towns and cities, not just locations like Washington, D.C., and New York City, according to emails seen by TheDCNF.
The firing of any Department of Justice officials will come in tandem with “an attack on Syria,” which “will likely be undertaken rapidly and remotely,” Himes says.
The congressman also notes that he believes “such an attack would be unconstitutional,” but says, “Presidents of both parties have done violence to the requirement that Congress authorize non-defensive military action,” referring to the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations.
Himes ends his email with a quote from President Abraham Lincoln and a call for action. “Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail. Without it, nothing can succeed,” he writes, adding, “You’ve proved Lincoln right several times in the last 14 months,” referring to previous anti-Trump protests. “It may be time to do it again.”
Progressive organizations like MoveOn.org have also been working with Democratic Party officials over the last 48 hours to assist in any potential protests.
Members of both organizations refer to the demonstrations as the “Mueller Firing Rapid Response event,” according to documents viewed by The DCNF
Trump has repeatedly signaled his frustration with the direction of the Mueller probe. After FBI investigators raided the office of his attorney, Michael Cohen, on Monday, the president described the incident as “disgraceful” and an “attack on our country.”
Previous reports have alleged that Trump has oftentimes expressed his desire to end the investigation, believing it has expanded far beyond its initial scope and that it is a “witch hunt.”
UN Security Council rejects Russian condemnation of Syria strike
by Joel Gehrke
Russia accused the U.S., France, and the United Kingdom of violating international law by attacking Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime absent approval from the United Nations.(AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)United Nations Security Council members rejected a Russian proposal to condemn the American-led attack on Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime, voting down the resolution in an emergency meeting Saturday afternoon.
The proposal failed, following a debate that pit the lack of U.N. support for the airstrikes against Western assessments that Assad has been using chemical weapons “with impunity” in the eighth year of the Syrian civil war. Only three members of the council supported the Russian resolution, compared to eight votes against, with the remaining four nations represented on the council abstaining.
“The time for talk ended last night,” U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said during the meeting. “The Syrian regime has forced us to take action.”
Russia accused the U.S., France, and the United Kingdom of violating international law by attacking Assad absent approval from the United Nations. “This is hooliganism in international relations, and not minor hooliganism, given that we're talking about major nuclear powers," Vasily Nebenzia, the Russian ambassador to the United Nations, said through a U.N. translator Saturday morning.
That complaint found some rhetorical support from U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who reminded Western allies that “the U.N. charter is very clear” on the laws governing the use of force.
“It is my duty to remind member states that there is an obligation, particularly when dealing with matters of peace and security, to act consistently with the charter of the United Nations and international law in general,” he said.
Western diplomats countered that Russia is not an honest broker in the debate, by propping up Assad while vetoing U.N. Security Council resolutions that might lead to his regime being held accountable for chemical weapons attacks.
“Russia's veto was the green light for the Assad regime to use these most barbaric weapons against the Syrian people in complete violation of international law,” Haley said before the vote. “The United States was not going to let that stand. Chemical weapons are a threat to us all. They are a unique threat — a type of weapon so evil that the international community agreed they must be banned.”
TRUMP WINS: At Long Last, China is Making Some Changes
Oh, the 2020 election is going to be a satisfying thing to watch. President Trump is going to have so much awesome ammunition to unleash on his opponents (both the Democrats and the mainstream media), that the American people may just decide on the spot to do away with term limits and make him President for Life.
Every time the idiots in the Establishment warn that he’s about to bring some kind of colossal catastrophe down on the country, a little bit of time passes, and presto: It turns out that Trump was right all along. It makes you wonder what kind of country we would have today if the last three or four presidents hadn’t meekly gone along with “conventional wisdom” every time things got a little bit sticky.
You’ll recall (since it was only last week) that experts were saying that President Trump’s decision to levy tariffs against China would result in disaster. The global economy would soon go into meltdown mode, China would begin opening up trade with other countries, the American farming industry would collapse under its own weight, and the American people would wind up paying hundreds of dollars for a single raisin.
We were at the mercy of an angry fool in the White House who didn’t know what he was doing, and we would pay the ultimate price for electing this idiot to lead us.
Smash cut to this week, and what do we see? Oh, what? What’s that? China’s already blinking in this international game of chicken. Well whaddya know.
“China does not seek trade surplus,” said President Xi Jinping on Tuesday. “We have a genuine desire to increase imports and achieve greater balance of international payments under the current accounts.”
Xi reported said that he would begin plans to “open” his country to additional imports and to “significantly” lower Chinese tariffs on automobiles manufactured in the United States.
This news immediately injected new life into the stock market. The Dow Jones soared nearly 400 points upon the announcement.
“Concerns over a potential trade war between the U.S. and China have been alleviated somewhat after Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed plans Tuesday to further open up the country’s economy, with measures including lowering import tariffs on autos, enforcing legal intellectual property of foreign groups and reducing duties on other consumer products,” CNBC reported.
Trump is not an academic like Obama or a man of intense faith like W., but he is possessed of an extraordinary instinct. And that instinct, which is indistinguishable from real genius, has guided him well over the last year of his presidency. Perhaps there will come a day when the naysayers in Washington will realize that though his strategies are new and different, that alone does not make them bad strategies. America voted for a fresh approach, and that’s what we’re getting.
And so far, in every way imaginable, that approach is paying dividends.
Sebastian Gorka on Syria: ‘Trump Is Not a Neo-Conservative’; ‘This Is Not George Bush’
by ROBERT KRAYCHIK
Sebastian Gorka joined SiriusXM host Rebecca Mansour and special guest host John Carney on Friday’s Breitbart News Tonight to discuss President Donald Trump’s strategy in ordering missile strikes on Syria.
Gorka described the military operations as a “surgical” and “very quick strike.”
Gorka added that the strikes were “meant to send a message [to] Bashar al-Assad, the mass murderer, and his sponsors, including Iran and Russia, that you cannot use illegal chemical weapons, and you will not be allowed to use them again against women and children. This is not a war, and this isn’t about al-Qaeda or ISIS. This is about the mass murder executed by Assad’s regime.”
Gorka said the strikes served both symbolic and practical ends. He remarked, “These were clearly targets that were parts of the chemical weapons capacity of the Assad regime, a research facility in Damascus, a facility that was storing the precursor materials [and] chemicals used to create these weapons and other facilities used in the production of these weapons. So it isn’t just a signal, but it is very much a signal, as well, but it is also a crippling blow to the chemical weapons capacity of the Damascus government.”
Gorka cast Russia as a declining power. “Russia is a failing nation. It’s a one-horse town, and that horse, that pony, was gas and oil exports. America is now a net energy exporter for the first time, and Russia is a shadow of its former Soviet self. It’s good at rattling its rusty saber, but that’s about it. … We killed hundreds of Russian mercenaries in Syria when they threatened our forces. What was the Russian response? Nothing. They’re still a nuclear power. They’re still a bad actor. Vladimir Putin is still a former KGB colonel, but their capacity to be a serious global actor like the United States? That is not true.”
Gorka rejected characterizations of the strikes as resembling the Bush administration’s neo-conservatism. He claimed, “I’ll tell you one thing: Donald J. Trump is not a neo-conservative, and he never will be a neo-conservative. This is not George Bush, and this man believes the invasion and occupation of other people’s countries is fundamentally un-American, and he will never waver from that.”
Gorka said America should enforce international conventions prohibiting certain chemical weapons. He said, “But [Donald Trump] is also — I know the left doesn’t believe this for a second, but I can guarantee you this — he is a very compassionate human being, whether it’s meeting the survivors and the victims of the Parkland shooting or whether it’s seeing the children, the infants, foaming at the mouth, poisoned by that chlorine gas attack in Syria, and he knows that if we don’t do anything, nobody will. He believes in that saying: ‘Evil wins, very simply, when good men do nothing.’ This isn’t about regime change. This isn’t Iraq in 2003. He isn’t George Bush. But if America stands for truth, if America is that shining light on a hill, then we do not allow mass murderers to use chemical weapons. It is that simple.”
Gorka further rejected concerns of the strikes as elements of open-ended conflicts without clear objectives. He stated, “People need to listen to the president. … Listen to what he said. Listen to what Secretary Mattis said. Listen to what the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said. We are not involved in a civil war. We’re not changing the regime, and we’re not picking sides. Chemical weapons are illegal. You cannot use them. Nobody can use them. We don’t have them. Nobody should have them, and when you use them against women and children, guess what? We will respond. Again, this isn’t 2003. He’s not George Bush, and we’re not going to deploy 160,000 troops into Syria.”
Gorka continued, “If Assad consistently uses illegal weapons of a chemical nature and America does nothing when it can — which is immoral to begin with — but when we do nothing when we can, what message does that send to North Korea? What message does that send to al-Qaeda? What message does that send to Russia, to China? Do we want the next chemical attack to be in Israel [or] Jordan? Are you prepared for the ramifications of that eventuality? You nip this in the bud, now, and that’s what the president is doing, and he is absolutely right in doing that. Have faith in Donald J. Trump. I worked for him. I know the man. Trust him.”
Mansour asked Gorka what lies ahead for the U.S. in Syria.
Gorka replied, “There’s only one person who knows the answer to that question, and he’s called Bashar al-Assad. The Syrian response to our action is the question right now. Will they make an effort to rid themselves of chemical weapons, but not in the way that Obama said they had and Kerry said they had and the Russians said they had? Will they actually do it this time? Will we see a concerted effort from certain sponsor states to exert pressure on that regime? Only time will tell. We have the capacity to do this again, but the ball is firmly located in the court of Damascus, and it’s up to Assad as to how he reacts. Time will tell.”
Breitbart News Tonight broadcasts live Monday through Friday on SiriusXM’s Patriot channel 125 from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern (6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pacific).
Our thanks to the folks at The Velma Teague Library in Glendale, Arizona for the use of their fine facilities. We will not post tomorrow (Sunday, April 15). Please check back in Monday. Big things are happening that we should discuss.
Ciao…….Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2018/04/www_4.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment