CAPITAL STORIES FOR CHILDREN

- Hallo friendsCAPITAL STORIES FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article ADVENTURE, Article ANIMATION, Article LATEST DONGENG, Article WORLD OF ANIMALS, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title :
link :

WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.BLOGSPOT.COM
Saturday, July 14, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****

SARAH SANDERS SHARES PHOTO OF PRESIDENT TRUMP SITTING IN WINSTON CHURCHILL’S CHAIR — INTERNET MELTS DOWN -- TWO OF A KIND?

You gotta c this…

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/woman-recording-strzok-testimony-tv-catches-creepiest-moment/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2018-07-13&utm_campaign=manualpost

RUSSIAN MILITARY CHARGED WITH HACKING DNC, HILLARY CAMPAIGN, STATE ELECTIONS
INDICTMENT: U.S. v. Viktor Borisovich Netyksho, et al...

Accused of stealing usernames, passwords...

Podesta breached…

THE LIBERTY DAILY

Is Lisa Page Spilling the Beans on Former FBI Lover Peter Strzok? (Rep. Matt Gaetz Says She was Much More Credible and Forthcoming in Closed-Door Meeting)

Conservative Badasses Jim Jordan, Mark Meadows Leading Effort to IMPEACH Rod Rosenstein — Impeachment Document Could be Filed as Early as Monday!

TIMING: In the Middle of POTUS Trump Being Honored by the Queen of England, Bitter Rod Rosenstein Interrupts With Press Conference Announcing Indictments of 12 Russians for ‘Hacking’ Hillary, DNC Emails During the Obama Regime [Why Did Susan Rice Give Stand Down Order?]

Jim Jordan Explains the Bombshell Revelation from the Strzok Hearing Everyone Should be Talking About — Enter DOJ’s Bruce Ohr and His Fusion GPS Wife, Nellie Ohr

Former Bill Clinton Adviser Mark Penn: ‘The Dishonesty of the Deep State’

 

What a Great Shot: First Color 3-D X-Ray Is Performed on a Human
By Deirdre Reilly

New technology works like a camera, allowing doctors to see the exact positioning and sizes of cancerous tumors






Scientists from New Zealand recently performed the first-ever 3-D color X-ray on a human being.

Developed by the European Organization for Nuclear Research, known as CERN, the new device works like a camera.

It collects individual subatomic particles as they rapidly collide with pixels when its shutter is open, the Agence France Press reported.

This allows for high-contrast, high-resolution pictures to be produced at a quick rate.

The device, named “Medipix,” incorporates particle-tracking technology developed for CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, which in 2012 discovered the Higgs Boson particle.

“This color X-ray imaging technique could produce clearer and more accurate pictures and help doctors give their patients more accurate diagnoses,” read a statement from CERN.

The “Medipix” is unique because it has the capability to show practitioners the difference between bone, muscle and cartilage in real time.

With this degree of advanced technology, doctors can examine the exact positioning and size of cancerous tumors, which will help to improve the quality of physical operation as we know it.

Trump Exposes Brexit Betrayal by Globalists

Written by  Alex Newman

President Donald Trump blasted the so-called “soft” Brexit deal negotiated by British Prime Minister Theresa May that will keep the United Kingdom under the boot of the European Union, with the U.S. leader saying that was not what the British people voted for in the historic 2016 referendum. Trump also warned that the agreement, which critics say is not an actual British exit from the EU, will likely kill a proposed lucrative trade deal with the United States offered by his administration. But all hope is not lost. In response to the betrayal of the people by May, multiple senior U.K. officials including Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson resigned. And in public comments, Trump said Johnson, a leading voice for a real Brexit, would make a “great prime minister.” Globalists were outraged.

Trump gave the exclusive interview to The Sun, a British publication owned by News Corporation boss Rupert Murdoch, shortly before leaving on a trip to Europe. It was published on July 13, as Trump was arriving in the United Kingdom to meet with Prime Minister May, Queen Elizabeth II, and others, after a trip to a NATO summit. Throughout his European tour, the president has been brutally honest. Among other comments that caused shockwaves among euro-globalists and the establishment, Trump blasted German authorities for sending billions of dollars to Putin's government and becoming dependent on Russian oil while expecting U.S. taxpayers and troops to protect Germany from the Kremlin. The president also slammed the mass immigration that he said was undermining Europeans' cultures, identities, and societies.

His comments attacking May's “soft” Brexit were the equivalent of dropping a bomb into British politics. As The New American has been warning practically since the vote to secede from the EU superstate, globalists have done everything possible to sabotage the British people's historic effort to reclaim their right to self-government. Even though more people voted for Brexit than have ever voted for anything in British history, globalists at all levels of society — government, Big Business, bureaucracy, Parliament, media, shadowy organizations such as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and more — have worked to derail it in every way. And until Trump exposed the fraud, with May's pseudo-Brexit deal with the EU, globalists thought they had succeeded. Basically, May's plan would keep Britain in the EU in all but name.

But Trump refused to stay quiet about the betrayal. In the interview with The Sun, the president said that the proposed deal was “very unfortunate” and that May had done the “opposite” of what he had recommended in talks with her. By extending an offer to secure a favorable bilateral trade deal, the Trump administration had already destroyed the EU's most important leverage over the British people. As Eurocrats sought to extort tens of billions of pounds from U.K. taxpayers while keeping them under EU “laws” created by unelected bureaucrats, the super state's primary threat was that they would block free British access to European markets. But by securing a deal with America, and being allowed to trade with Europe on the same terms as anyone else, Britain could have flourished like never before.

Now, that may all go down the tubes thanks to May's “soft” Brexit scheming. “If they do a deal like that, we would be dealing with the European Union instead of dealing with the UK, so it will probably kill the deal,” Trump explained. “If they do that, then their trade deal with the US will probably not be made.” In fact, it may be even worse than just killing a potential trade deal with Washington. According to Trump, May's plan “will definitely affect trade with the United States, unfortunately in a negative way.” Trump warned that the U.S. government is already having “enough difficulty” with the EU, and that his administration intends to stop it. “We are cracking down right now on the European Union because they have not treated the United States fairly on trading,” he said, adding that May's proposed deal would “probably end a major trade relationship with the United States.”

Trump also implied that May and her globalist allies were betraying their people by subverting their vote to secede. “The deal she is striking is a much different deal than the one the people voted on,” Trump explained, pointing to the 800-pound gorilla in the room that globalists were hoping nobody would notice. “It was not the deal that was in the referendum. I have just been hearing this over the last three days. I know they have had a lot of resignations. So a lot of people don’t like it.” He also said that the deal would “absolutely” cause him to walk away from the negotiating table. “I think what is going on is very unfortunate,” Trump added. At a press conference in Brussels, Trump echoed his concerns. “I don’t know if that’s what they voted for,” he said about the fake Brexit deal pushed by May,

The Sun said Trump's attacks on the phony Brexit deal would “pour nitroglycerine on the already raging Tory Brexiteer revolt against the PM.” The “Tory Brexiteer revolt” refers to the growing uprising among pro-Brexit Conservative Party lawmakers and officials who refuse to participate in the fraud May and her globalist allies are trying to perpetrate against the British people. The prime minister, though, who was publicly opposed to Brexit before the vote, falsely claimed that the deal was in fact a legitimate Brexit. “We have come to an agreement at the proposal we’re putting to the European Union which absolutely delivers on the Brexit people voted for,” she claimed in a statement after Trump's comments were published. “They voted for us to take back control of our money, our law and our borders and that’s exactly what we will do.”

However, few believe that, and May's government is teetering on the edge of collapse after the stunning betrayal. And there are growing rumblings among lawmakers and the people that she should resign in disgrace. One widely touted potential replacement would be Boris Johnson, the former foreign secretary who resigned in disgust rather than participate in May's fraud on the British people. Trump described Johnson as a “a very talented guy” and said “I like him a lot.” “I have a lot of respect for Boris. He obviously likes me, and says very good things about me,” Trump added. “I was very saddened to see he was leaving government and I hope he goes back in at some point. I think he is a great representative for your country.” While careful to say he was not trying to pit May and Johnson against each other, Trump said he thought Johnson “would be a great prime minister.” “I think he’s got what it takes,” the president added.  

British critics were outraged about Trump's comments. Labour Party boss Jeremy Corbin, a radical leftist who reportedly collaborated with mass-murdering communist regimes during the Cold War, slammed Trump and questioned whether his mother had taught him manners. London's controversial Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, who has presided over surging crime rates, ripped Trump as well, expressing outrage after Trump said the mayor had done a “very bad job on terrorism.” Other political figures on the far left went ballistic, spewing false accusations against Trump and claiming that a “racist” should not be allowed to meet the British queen. But Trump took it all in stride, and reiterated that The Sun had omitted many of the positive things he said about May and the United Kingdom.  

But Trump's comments represent a total shift from the rhetoric of globalist former President Barack Hussein Obama, who warned Brits before Brexit that they should stay in the EU or face serious consequences. The ex-president also threatened ahead of the vote that if they declared independence from Brussels, the Brits would be “at the back of the queue” in negotiating any trade deals with America. Ironically, though, polling suggested that Obama's half-baked interference in the historic U.K. vote only strengthened the pro-secession movement. By contrast, Trump, who was then a candidate for president, predicted that Brexit would succeed and encouraged the British people to reclaim their nation from globalists in Brussels. Of course, he was proven correct.    

After the interview appeared online, Trump said in a press conference that The Sun had omitted many of his comments praising Prime Minister May. “I didn’t criticize the prime minister,” Trump explained. “I have a lot of respect for the prime minister and unfortunately there was a story that was done which was generally fine but it didn’t put in what I said about the prime minister and I said tremendous things. Fortunately we tend to record stories now so we have it for your enjoyment if you'd like it. We report when we deal with reporters. It is called fake news.” During the interview with The Sun, Trump also ridiculed the “fake news” purveyors at the Washington Post, dismissing the increasingly shrill anti-Trump hysteria factory as a “lobbyist for Amazon.” Establishment bigwig Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, bought the Post and accelerated its transformation into a transparent propaganda megaphone for globalism and dishonest anti-Trump extremism.  

Unfortunately, the British people have been betrayed by globalists yet again. But fortunately, the story does not have to end here. And with President Trump on their side, the people of Britain can reclaim their sovereignty, boost their prosperity, restore self-government, and ignore the increasingly deranged threats from a totalitarian EU that refuses to accept the will of the people. Just Trump's public comments exposing the fraud may well crush the plans of globalist insiders to keep the British people under Brussels' boot. But the Brits and the American people must continue to educate themselves and organize if they hope to preserve and protect their liberties. Globalists have already shown that they will use deception and immorality to advance their agenda. But patriots and liberty-minded people everywhere can defeat them using the truth.



Lying NY Democratic Candidate Takes Pledge To Try To Lie Less… And Fails

JAZZ SHAW

On Wednesday we talked about the candid camera video of NY-21 Democratic congressional candidate Tedra Cobb. She was caught on film admitting that she wants to pass an “assault weapons” ban and other gun control measures, but she was advised by representatives of Moms Demand Action to not say it aloud because she couldn’t be elected if she did. This led to a couple of local newspapers, including the Glens Falls Post-Star, trying to get both Cobb and incumbent Congresswoman Elise Stefanik to take a pledge not to lie to the public, to the press, on social media or anywhere else. But as you’ll see below, a closer examination of the video released earlier this week shows that Cobb’s promises probably aren’t worth much because she’s already considered doing precisely what she’s accused of.

First, we can look at Cobb’s “official” response, as detailed by the Adirondack Daily News. They burn through a lot of ink talking about how the local press supposedly had trouble getting Stefanik to take their “no lying pledge” (which she actually responded to in the affirmative through her spokesperson as soon as she was asked, but the editor apparently didn’t want to accept the word of a surrogate). Then they get down to the question of Cobb and her apparent uneasiness with the truth. (Emphasis added)

The Glens Falls newspaper had asked the candidates in New York’s 21st Congressional District not to lie in any way: to the media, to voters, in advertisements or on social media. The Post-Star announced the pledge in an editorial July 1, five days after Tedra Cobb won the June 26 Democratic Party primary and Stefanik’s campaign publicly ramped up…

Cobb accepted the pledge in a letter to the editor she submitted to the Post-Star July 5 and reiterated the support in a phone interview with the paper July 6…

“My opponent says one thing in private, & another in public,” Stefanik tweeted Thursday. “Just days after pledging to be honest with voters, my opponent was caught on camera saying that she must lie to voters in order to get elected.”

Cobb, in a statement to the Watertown Daily Times, said she’s not trying to pass an assault weapons ban because it would be impossible with the current Congress and president, so instead she’s focusing on gun-control measures more people agree on.

So Cobb is on record saying she’ll be telling the truth, eh? And she’s “not trying to pass an assault weapons ban.” Does that mean that if she doesn’t support a weapons ban during the campaign she won’t vote for one if it comes up once she reaches Washington? That’s obviously the implication. But as I said at the top, there’s another nugget in that YouTube video which puts the lie to that claim.

All of the focus earlier this week was on her comment about Moms Demand which comes at the 1:45 mark. I’m guilty of sending everyone to that section of the video myself. But if we rewind a bit, you’ll hear two of the unnamed “Teens for Tedra” talking to her about how it would be nice if she could hide her intentions during the campaign and then go vote for a ban anyway once elected. I’ve set up the video to start at that part of the conversation, which begins at around the one minute mark. We’ll include the brief transcript after the video.

Teen 1: It’s such a difficult issue to do. Especially in your case because you can’t, you know, say much about it.

Teen 2: The nice thing is that when she’s there she can vote with her heart.

Cobb: Right.

Teen 2: That’s nice. But it means getting there. Especially in this district, it’s so… it’s just tough.

At that point, Cobb launches into the part of the conversation everyone was talking about earlier this week regarding her work with Moms Demand Action.

So two of the teenagers are talking about how Cobb has to keep her feelings on gun bans in the closet and one of them says that the “nice thing” is that when she gets to Washington she can, “vote with her heart.” Does Cobb chastise the youths, reminding them of the need for candidates to be honest and cast their votes the way they indicated during the campaign? Perish the thought. She simply says, “Right.”

Which Tedra Cobb should the voters of New York believe? The one who sends official statements to the press or the one chatting with her teenage supporters when she thinks nobody is listening? Keep in mind that one of the two teenagers quoted above reminded everyone to keep a lid on things, saying, “This is a closed group here. Nobody share this.”

I’m not sure how you keep a campaign going after these sorts of revelations. Granted, the idea of politicians lying on the campaign trail is pretty much as old as politics itself, but they’re supposed to at least do a better job of trying to trick us than this.

This Shocking Poll Just Destroyed The Blue Wave And Guarantees Trump Wins In 2020

Democrats are drooling over the prospect of bouncing Donald Trump from office.

Up to 20 Democrats are considering running for President because they are convinced Trump is primed for defeat in his re-election campaign.

But this shocking poll destroyed their dreams of a blue wave and pointed towards Trump winning a second term in 2020.

Democrats are invested in the concept of identity politics.

They believe in slicing and dicing Americans up into ethnic, gender, and religious groups and promising government goodies to protect their “rights” as members of those groups.

One example is how Democrats use the promise of amnesty for illegal aliens to cement Hispanics as part of their coalition.

But in 2016, Donald Trump upset this apple cart.

Despite a media smear campaign to use lies and fake news to tar him as a racist, Trump won a greater percentage of the Hispanic vote than Mitt Romney did in 2012.

The left was infuriated, but journalists and liberals believed Trump’s zero tolerance immigration policy – as well as the manufactured crisis surrounding separating children from their parents at the border – would turn Hispanic voters against the President and allow the Democrats to flip key states like Florida and Arizona – which would seal Trump’s doom in 2020.

But those dreams were crushed when Emerson College released a new poll that found 62 percent of Hispanics believe they are better off with Donald Trump as President as opposed to Barack Obama.

The survey also showed that 42 percent of Hispanic voters stated they were better off under the Trump economy, as opposed to 26 percent who reported they felt worse off because of the President’s policies.

President Trump bragged about these results on twitter:

“A RECENT EMERSON COLLEGE EPOLL SAID THAT MOST AMERICANS, ESPECIALLY HISPANICS, FEEL THAT THEY ARE BETTER OFF UNDER PRESIDENT TRUMP THAN THEY WERE UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA.”

The findings of this poll line up with the reality in America—as opposed to the alternate universe the media is trying to fool people exists.

While so-called “journalists” focus on negative coverage of the Trump administration, Americans are paying attention to the bottom line.

And the economy is booming.

The latest jobs report found Hispanic unemployment at an all-time low of 4.6 percent.

And the Bureau of Labor Statistics found the median weekly wages for Hispanic workers rose from $649 in the first quarter of 2017 to $675 in the first quarter of 2018.

These positive economic indicators explain the Emerson Poll as well as an April Harvard/Harris Poll.

That survey found President Trump with a 47 percent approval rating among Hispanic voters.

The media and Democrats are making a mistake believing Hispanics are single-issue amnesty voters.

Conservatives treat Hispanics like every other American and realize they have the same hopes and dreams of leaving a better future for their children as anyone else.

That’s why polls are showing Hispanic voters rewarding President Trump for focusing on policies that free up the economy to deliver higher wages for all Americans.

If Trump maintains – or improves – his standing with Hispanic voters in 2020, he will hold all the states he won in 2016 and put blue states like Colorado and Nevada in play.

And that will add up to a convincing re-election victory for President Trump.



Manchin on pressure from Schumer over SCOTUS nom: ‘Kiss my you know what’

BPR Wire Jessica Kramer, DCNF

West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin said he wouldn’t concede when it came to talk of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer potentially pressuring him into a no vote on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination.

“I’ll be 71 years old in August, you’re going to whip me? Kiss my you know what,” said Manchin, a red state senator and potential swing vote, when asked what his response would be if Schumer stiff arms him in the upcoming senate hearings, according to Politico.

Schumer and other Democrats are trying block the Kavanaugh nomination — in large part because they believe he would potentially vote to overturn Roe v. Wade and other health care policies, according to The Hill.

Schumer and the rest of leadership plan to put pressure on vulnerable Democratic senators from Republican or right-leaning swing states because these individuals more often vote independently and tread carefully in hopes of holding onto their seat, according to Politico.

To be successful, Schumer is going to need all Senate Democrats to vote no and a moderate Republican — like Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski or Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins — to follow suit, according to Time. The two senators are supportive of abortion rights.

“I’m going to vote the way I’m going to vote regardless of what the leader says,” said North Dakota Democratic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, according to Politico.

Senators like Manchin, Heitkamp and Indiana Democratic Sen. Joe Donnelly are all potential yes votes since all three supported President Donald Trump’s last Supreme Court nominee, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Politico reported.

“My decision won’t have anything to do with Chuck Schumer,” Donnelly told Politico.

CDC Issues Warning About Kellogg’s Honey Smacks: ‘Do Not Eat This Cereal’

AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued awarning about Honey Smacks, a brand of Kellogg’s cereal, saying it has been linked to an outbreak of salmonella that has already infected up to 100 people across 33 states.

The health agency’s warning said, “Do not eat this cereal,” the Associated Press reported:

CDC ✔@CDCgov

OUTBREAK Update: 100 Salmonella infections in 33 states linked to Kellogg’s Honey Smacks cereal. Do not eat this cereal. https://go.usa.gov/xQtxX

2:38 PM - Jul 12, 2018

The warning is a blanket statement, one not based on any particular product expiration date. Customers should either throw away the product or may return their box of cereal to a store for a full refund.

The CDC reported that 24 of the people affected have been hospitalized after becoming infected with bacteria. Symptoms develop between 12 and 72 hours after infection and feature a fever, cramps, or diarrhea.

“There have been 73 ill people reported from 31 states, including 24 people who have been hospitalized. No deaths have been reported,” the agency reported on its website.

The illnesses began in the first week of June. By June 14, Kellogg’s issued a recall order on the product.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.



Majority of Americans don’t know what Roe v. Wade actually means
By Michael J. New

(National Review) Justice Kennedy’s announcement that he is retiring from the U.S. Supreme Court has dramatically raised salience of sanctity-of-life issues. Supporters of legal abortion and their allies in the mainstream media are working tirelessly to generate opposition to a constitutionalist nominee who might vote to weaken or overturn the Roe v. Wade decision. One key talking point among many abortion-rights groups is that Roe is a decision that enjoys broad public support and should be considered settled. Indeed, a flurry of polls released in recent days by NBC News/Survey Monkey, Kaiser Family Foundation, and Quinnipiac University all purportedly find that over 60 percent of respondents support Roe v. Wade.

These polls are all misleading for several reasons. First, a significant number of Americans are unfamiliar with the Roe v. Wade decision. A Pew Research Center poll taken in 2013 found that only 62 percent of respondents were aware that Roe v. Wade dealt with abortion. Seventeen percent thought Roe v. Wade dealt with some other public-policy issue and 20 percent were unfamiliar with the decision. Furthermore, even many who realize Roe v. Wadedealt with abortion fail to understand the full implications of the decision. Many wrongly think that overturning Roe v. Wade would result in national ban on abortion, instead a reversal of Roe would return the issue to the states.

Additionally, many polling questions, including the recent questions by NBC News/Survey Monkey, the Kaiser Family Foundation, and Quinnipiac University all fail to inform respondents that Roe v. Wade effectively legalized abortion on demand for all nine months of pregnancy and makes it difficult to place limits on late-term abortions. Historically, there has been very little public support for second-trimester or third-trimester abortions. For instance, a Gallup poll that was released this June found that only 28 percent of people thought second-trimester abortions should be legal and only 13 percent thought third-trimester abortions should be legal.

In 2006, Crisis Magazine published a useful article by Mark Stricherz, which analyzed polling on Roe v. Wade. He looks at the polls conducted during the Supreme Court confirmation hearings of John Roberts and Samuel Alito in the mid 2000s. A Gallup poll at this time described Roe v. Wade as the decision that “legalized abortion” giving respondents the incorrect impression that abortion was always illegal beforehand. The Pew Research Center survey described Roe v. Wade as having “established a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion, at least in the first three months of pregnancy.”

Both the Gallup and the Pew Research Center found that support for Roe v. Wade was over 60 percent. However, when the Los Angeles Times described Roe v. Wade as the decision “which permits a woman to get an abortion from a doctor at any time” — support fell to 43 percent.

Seasoned observers of the U.S. Supreme Court realize that rulings on high-visibility issues are often influenced by public opinion. As such, it should come as no surprise that since 1973 supporters of legal abortion have tried to make a concerted effort to convince the Supreme Court that Roe v. Wade enjoys very broad public support. However, a closer look at the survey data indicates that is not the case. Incremental pro-life laws, such as limits on late-term abortions, have always been broadly supported. Furthermore, public support for Roe v. Wade significantly drops in well-designed polls which fully explain its implications. Pro-lifers would do well to not be discouraged and stay the course.

A Deep State FBI Agent Crossed Donald Trump For The Last Time

Ex-FBI agent Lisa Page was one of the central figures in the FBI’s Russia and Clinton email investigations.

Page also found herself as part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s witch hunt against the President.

But now this Deep State FBI agent has crossed Donald Trump for the last time.

A joint House Oversight and Judiciary Committee investigation is being conducted into the FBI’s conduct during the 2016 election after Inspector General Michael Horowitz revealed how corruption and anti-Trump bias ooze throughout the upper levels of the FBI under former Director James Comey.

As part of Horowitz’s report, he detailed reams of text messages between Page and Peter Strzok – the high level FBI agent who signed off on the Russia investigation and who was having an affair with Page – about how much they hated Trump.

But their communications went beyond simple political disagreements.

Page and Strzok exchanged texts about how the Russia investigation was “an insurance policy” against Trump winning.

And one exchange saw Page express her fear that Trump would win and Strzok responded that they would “stop” him.

After Horowitz testified in front of Congress it was only natural to get Page and Strzok’s side of the story.

Strzok testified behind closed doors and was subpoenaed to appear in public.

Page was also subpoenaed to testify before Congress.

But now Page is balking.

Page’s attorney Amy Jeffress stated “The Committees would be asking Lisa about materials that she has not yet been shown,”

Jeffress continued “We have asked the Committees to schedule another date that would allow sufficient time for her to prepare,” she continued. “The Committees have not honored this request. As a result, Lisa is not going to appear for an interview at this time.”

This did not go over well.

President Trump learned of Page’s defiance while traveling to the NATO summit in Europe and expressed his outrage.

President Trump tweeted:

Donald J. Trump ✔@realDonaldTrump

I am on Air Force One flying to NATO and hear reports that the FBI lovers, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are getting cold feet on testifying about  the Rigged Witch Hunt headed by 13 Angry Democrats and people that worked for Obama for 8 years. Total disgrace!

7:40 AM - Jul 10, 2018

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte also blasted the decision tweeting:

Bob Goodlatte ✔@RepGoodlatte

Lisa Page plans to blatantly defy a congressional subpoena by refusing to appear for her deposition. She is a key witness, and it is critical that she come before @HouseJudiciary to answer questions as part of our investigation. It appears she has something to hide.

9:03 PM - Jul 10, 2018

And Speaker Paul Ryan threatened to hold Page in contempt of Congress if she blew off her Congressional testimony.

Ryan declared “If she wants to come plead the Fifth, that’s her choice. But a subpoena to testify before Congress is not optional. It’s mandatory. She needs to comply.”

President Trump and Republicans in Congress have had enough of the FBI’s excuses and cover ups.

It’s time for the Bureau to come clean on what really happened during the 2016 election.

And that starts with Page testifying before Congress.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this story.

SARAH SANDERS SHARES PHOTO OF TRUMP SITTING IN WINSTON CHURCHILL’S CHAIR — INTERNET MELTS DOWN

G’ day…Ciao…

Helen and Moe Lauzier

Thus Article

That's an article This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2018/07/www_14.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: