Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.BLOGSPOT.COM
Friday, July 20, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Engagement with Putin? Trump Is Hardly the First Putin to D.C. in Fall.
Republican Congressman Who Visited Socialist East Berlin in 1979, Urges: ‘Do Not Repeat the Nightmare of Socialism,’ Where People Were ‘Equally Without Opportunity’ and ‘Equally Without Freedom’
President Trump Demands Muslim Turkey Tyrant Erdogan Return Christian Pastor Andrew Brunson
Did The Obama FBI Ignore Evidence That Clinton’s Classified Emails Ended Up In the Hands Of A ‘Foreign Entity’?
Under Obama, the ‘Intelligence’ Community Spied on Obama’s Political Opponent Donald Trump, So Why the Hell Would He Trust Them?
Don’t fall into dangerous trap of condemning Trump for his performance at Helsinki summit. (Just announced --- Putin to D.C. about mid October)
t
(LifeSiteNews) – Don’t fall into the dangerous trap of condemning Trump for his performance at the Helsinki summit with Putin. If anything, regardless of some bumbling by Trump during the press conference, Trump should be heaped with praise for what he did in Helsinki. It appears that too many want a war with Russia, a potential war that Trump went a long ways to avoid, and contrary to the massive media hysteria, without at all weakening the US position.
We will find out in the months ahead exactly what agreements were reached during the lengthy private meeting between the two top world nuclear powers. I can’t see that anything but very positive results would have come from that meeting given Trump’s consistent track record on international affairs.
Trump has been massively strengthening the US military, just as Ronald Reagan did, for the purpose of negotiating from a position of peace through strength. Just prior to the Helsinki summit he also berated his weak NATO allies for their pathetic military investments and that berating has appeared to result in a decades overdue significant strengthening of NATO allied commitments. He also berated the NATO partners for putting themselves into a dangerous dependency on Russian oil and gas. It appears that that situation is also going to be changed because of Trump’s actions.
If those are the actions of a Russian puppet or collaborator then I am a monkey’s uncle.
Trump derangement syndrome has reached an all time high as a result of the Helsinki meeting, To me, that means only one thing – this was Trump’s greatest accomplishment ever that the New World Order lackeys cannot tolerate. Trump keeps upsetting all of their plans and, it appears, this has been their worst defeat.
There are others who are doing a much better job than I am capable of in writing and speaking about the very positive significance of what President Trump achieved at the Helsinki summit with Russia’s President Putin. I strongly recommend the article by Brietbart’s John Nolte for one and this interview with U.S. Russia expert Stephen Cohen.
Donald Trump is hated above all for his intense commitment to traditional American principles. And among those principles are a strong defense of life, family, faith and free speech. That is why this insane reaction to his Helsinki meeting with Putin should be of great concern to readers of LifeSite. We cannot afford to have this man removed from office or crippled by sanctions and other actions.
President Trump, it seems, is all that we have going for us today on the national and international scale. Even the pope and the Vatican are no longer with us, for the first time in history.
Keep seeking and reading alternative media reports and analysis on anything related to President Trump. Only there will you find the truth.
Rush: Media’s Furious Because Trump Dodged the Deadly Trap They Set at Summit
BY BEN MARQUIS
Both before and especially after his high-stakes summit in Helsinki, Finland, with Russian President Vladimir Putin, President Donald Trump received withering fire in the form of harsh criticism from the liberal media and bipartisan political establishment in Washington D.C.
Far too many of those critics cranked up their “outrage” to the maximum level and accused Trump of committing treason against America, ostensibly because he declined to publicly admonish Putin for meddling in the 2016 election and for not uncritically accepting the largely evidence-free assertions of such that originally came from the now-provably biased intelligence community of the prior Obama administration.
But conservative talk radio king Rush Limbaugh isn’t buying those reasons as the end-all, be-all of the furious and over-the-top reactions of the media and political establishment to Trump’s summit with Putin, and suggested that there was an ulterior motive behind both the outrage and Trump’s decision to not publicly state the things that so many of his detractors wanted to hear him say.
On Tuesday’s program, Limbaugh stated, “There has to be a reason for this delusional, out of control, deranged and yet unified reaction to Trump and Putin in the press conference yesterday. There has to be some explanation for it. And it’s not that Trump didn’t call Putin out. That’s not what these people are upset about. It’s what they’re trying to make you think they’re upset about.”
“And I am here to tell you, it is not what they are telling you it is. It is not that they think Trump acted treasonously. It is not that they think Trump didn’t call Putin out. It is not that Trump did not defend his own intelligence people,” he continued.
Rather, Limbaugh attempted to explain that the real reason the media and political establishment were so completely outraged by the summit is that, once again, Trump essentially outsmarted them and declined to play into their preset narrative by avoiding saying things that would immediately be used against him before the summit was even officially concluded.
Limbaugh glossed over how the media and political establishment still haven’t gotten over the fact that Trump won the 2016 election and are still operating under the delusion that he will say or do something where they can shout “Aha, this time we’ve got him,” and remove him from office, ending the dire threat Trump truly poses to the establishment’s status quo.
“Trump isn’t stupid. Trump is not ignorant. Trump is not incapable of nuance,” stated Limbaugh of the anti-Trump efforts, and later reiterated that “Trump has confounded them in every single effort they have made and mounted against him. They’re at their wits’ end now.”
With an eye toward the media’s ongoing narrative regarding Russian interference in the election and supposed collusion between Russia and Trump’s campaign — two separate issues that have been deliberately conflated into one by the media — Limbaugh proceeded to get to the heart of his theory about why Trump refrained from publicly acknowledging the Russian interference at the summit.
“And now we’re told that Donald Trump can go ahead and — in a press conference with Vladimir Putin — he can acknowledge that the Russians meddled while at the same time be protected from any allegation that he colluded,” Limbaugh said. “Sorry, folks, if Donald Trump had done what they wanted him to do yesterday — if Donald Trump had done what they were trying to force him to do — if Donald Trump had acknowledged to Vladimir Putin’s face that he had meddled in the 2016 presidential election?”
“Before that press conference was over, the New York Times would have a headline: ‘Trump Validates Mueller Investigation.’ ‘Trump Acknowledges Russians Affected Election Outcome.’ ‘Trump Acknowledges Russia May Have Played a Role in Thwarting American Democracy.’ There is no doubt in my mind that if Donald Trump had acknowledged what everybody in the deep state is demanding that he acknowledge, that the Russians meddled — which, they meddle in everything, and they have been for 50 years,” Limbaugh asserted.
“But in this case, the people of this country have been told that Donald Trump’s illegitimate, just like George Bush was illegitimate because of the Florida recount. His presidency was illegitimate, invalid. ‘We don’t have to listen to what George W. Bush wants or thinks.’ Same thing with Trump,” he continued.
“They simply refuse to accept that they were defeated, and Trump — if he had acknowledged the meddling of the Russians — all you would be seeing today is that Trump acknowledges Putin may have or did affect the outcome of the election. Because that’s what they’ve wanted, just like … remember those press conferences where the media demanded George W. Bush apologize, admit he had made mistakes, and Bush wouldn’t do it?” Limbaugh said.
“The same thing with Donald Trump here. He cannot bifurcate this. He cannot acknowledge that Putin meddled, because if he did — and if he ever does — then the media is going to include and write that Trump has finally acknowledged that there was tampering in the election and that his victory may now be in question and that Donald Trump knows it. That’s what they want to write. He’s not giving them a chance to write it,” Limbaugh added.
Limbaugh concluded that Trump had worked incredibly hard to win the presidency and wasn’t about to play into the hands of those who would diminish or delegitimize such an amazing achievement, whether that be the liberal media, Democrats or NeverTrump Republicans or even the Russians themselves, which “is entirely rational and understandable to me.”
Once again, Rush Limbaugh has hit the nail on the head and cut through all of the media’s BS to strike at the heart of the matter, which is the still-ongoing fixation of Trump’s detractors on finding a way to undermine and ultimately destroy his presidency, by any means necessary.
Nancy Pelosi Might Have to Retire After The Terrible News She Received
Nancy Pelosi’s life was turned upside down when Donald Trump was elected President.
His election slashed her dreams of serving as Speaker of the House under a Clinton administration.
But even that news wasn’t as bad as what just came out that may force her to retire.
Hillary Clinton’s loss in 2016 sent the Democrat party into a frenzy of confusion.
They were so sure that Hillary Clinton was going to win that a loss to Donald Trump didn’t even cross their minds.
So when Trump won, and Republicans held onto their majorities in the House and Senate, they truly had no idea what to do.
Their entire plan was immediately shut down, instead of having full majority power as planned, they were stuck in a minority.
There was perhaps nobody, besides Hillary Clinton, who was more upset about this than Rep. Nancy Pelosi.
Being the highest ranking Democrat in the House of Representatives, she was bound to easily be elected Speaker of the House.
Instead, she was forced to accept her position as Minority Leader.
In her position, her main job has been doing everything she can to stop Republicans in the House from implementing President Trump’s agenda.
But she has done a poor job, with President Trump being able to implement a number of his major proposals, including historic tax-cuts.
This has angered many Democrats, who have lost faith in the current Democrat Party.
That anger has been channeled into electing Democrats with a more extreme agenda, like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, an admitted socialist who defeated Rep. Joe Crowley in New York’s 14th Congressional District.
Cortez is the 4th highest ranking democrat in House, who had a plan in the works to take Speaker’s chair if Democrats were to regain a majority in the upcoming midterm elections.
This should be a good thing for Pelosi, as Crowley was planning to directly compete with her to take the seat she so desperately wants.
But even with Crowley losing his seat, it seems as though he might not be done battling with Pelosi.
In a recent interview with CBS, Crowley was pressed on whether he would back Pelosi for Speaker if Democrats were to take back the House.
Instead of endorsing her, Crowley cast doubts about Pelosi being able to be elected as Speaker.
While he did state that Pelosi will have a “strong case for holding on to the speakership” if given the chance, he did bring up some doubts.
He said that “there may be other issues that come to the fore at that point,” before making it clear that the decision is up to the next Congress to make that decision.
While that statement may seem like tepid support on the surface, it clearly shows that Crowley is not excited about the prospect of a Speaker Pelosi.
If Crowley’s sentiment is shared among enough Democrat members of Congress, it could easily squash Pelosi’s chances.
But before she will even have a chance to be elected Speaker the Democrats will need to take back the House.
Photo Of Smiling Chuck Schumer Eating Doughnuts With Vladimir Putin Breaks Internet
Stephen Chernin / Stringer / Getty Images
The Senate's Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, ramped up to Defcon 1 after President Trump met with Vladimir Putin.
"I’m from Brooklyn," the New York Democart said on the Senate floor on Tuesday. "We learned one thing there, if we learned anything: when there’s a bully around, as Putin is, you show strength. But President Trump showed abject weakness. You know what that means? The bully will continue to take advantage of him. If President Trump was such an easy mark in Helsinki, President Putin will realize he’s an easy mark elsewhere."
Yes, Schumer — had he been the one meeting with the Russian president and former KGB agent — would have been tougher.
Which makes it hilarious that a photo of Schumer smiling and eating doughnuts with Putin has re-emerged.
The two met in New York City in 2003, with Schumer welcoming the leader as Russian oil company Lukoil opened a gas station in Manhattan, NTK reports.
The AP photo shows Putin and Schumer smiling, with coffee and Krispy Kreme doughnuts. The caption reads:
Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, enjoys a Krispy Kreme doughnut and coffee with Senator Charles Schumer from New York as Putin visits the first New York gas station of the Russian company Lukoil, Friday.
Schumer also said that day:
“When I showed the president of Russia a Krispy Kreme doughnut and he ate it and said it was good, that was one of the more surreal moments I’ve had in politics.”
In 2008, Schumer buddied up with Putin, writing in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal — headlined "Russia Can Be Part of the Answer on Iran" — that Putin could help in negotiations.
Abortionist Slams Brett Kavanaugh: He “Threatens the Freedom to Have an Abortion”
MICAIAH BILGER
Abortionist Willie Parker slammed conservative U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh this week by claiming he could jeopardize the freedom of future generations by overturning Roe v. Wade.
In an open letter to the U.S. Senate published at Teen Vogue, Parker claimed the “freedom” to have an abortion is at stake.
With moderate Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, Kavanaugh could swing the court to a conservative majority and be a deciding opinion on vital issues like abortion restrictions and Roe v. Wade. Abortion activists are heavily lobbying U.S. Senators to oppose Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
“Senators, we, the people, need you to take a stand,” Parker wrote. “We need you to think about the future generations of this country. If Kavanaugh is not blocked from taking a seat on our highest court, it is inevitable that our freedoms will be stripped from our bodies and from our lives.”
Parker claimed women’s basic freedom is at stake because the high court could protect unborn babies from abortion. Describing abortion as “care,” “safe” and “essential,” he hid from his readers the reality of the violent, life-destroying practice that he earns his living doing.
Later in the letter, Parker lamented that one of his patients kept her unborn baby, rather than seek out a second-trimester abortion.
Parker wrote:
My patient from the Mississippi Delta, I’ll call her Sheila, illustrates the unconscionable difference one’s zip code can make in determining reproductive rights. A mother of three in one of the poorest areas of the country, Sheila presented to the only clinic in Mississippi located in the state capital of Jackson, some three hours away from her home, thinking herself early in the first trimester. State-mandated physician counseling and a 24-hour waiting period meant that I had to be the one to tell her that she was 16 weeks, zero days, the cutoff for abortion procedures in a non-hospital setting in the state. Sullen, she returned home to the Delta, indicating that she had neither the time nor resources to travel to the state next-door to Mississippi, my home state of Alabama, where the cutoff date is 20 weeks post-fertilization. Merely residing in the “wrong” state can literally determine whether reproductive rights are obtainable.
In his blindness, Parker failed to see that a baby may be alive and even thriving because of the mother’s choice. What’s more, Sheila may be happy she made that choice, too. A large study by pro-abortion researchers at the University of California San Francisco found that only 5 percent of women who were turned away from abortion facilities because they were too far along still wished they had abortions. That suggests 95 percent of the women who once considered abortion later were glad they had their babies.
But Parker called women’s legal right to have their unborn babies killed a “freedom” and likened Roe v. Wade to the emancipation of African Americans from slavery.
“This freedom is now being threatened thanks to the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, someone who has already proven to us time and time again that he does not value the equality, rights, or safety of women,” he wrote.
In doing so, he missed the entire point of American freedom. It is not just for some, freedom is for all.
Every human life should receive the same rights and freedoms guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution. Anything less is discriminatory and abusive. The end of slavery began to restore those fundamental rights to Black Americans, and the end of Roe v. Wade will begin to do that for Americans who are not yet born.
POLL: REPUBLICANS OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORT TRUMP’S PUTIN PRESS CONFERENCE
Mike Brest | Contributor
Mike Brest | Contributor
An overwhelming majority of self-identified Republicans support the way President Trump handled his press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier this week, according to an Axios poll that was released Thursday morning.
Of the Republicans who voted, 79 percent said they are supportive of Trump’s handling of the conference. Conversely, only 18 percent of Republicans said they did not approve of it. That leaves only 3 percent of Republicans undecided on the president’s performance at the conference.
While this poll shows many Republicans being supportive of the president, there were many conservative lawmakers that did not enjoy the way Trump handled himself.
“Today’s press conference in Helsinki was one of the most disgraceful performances by an American president in recent memory,” Sen.John McCain said in a statement Monday. The online poll was conducted by SurveyMonkey on July 16-17. They surveyed 2,100 adults living in the United States. The margin of error for the survey is plus or minus 3 percentage points.
FBI Director: Chinese Espionage ‘Most Significant Threat We Face as a Country’
Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesFBI Director Christopher Wray told the Aspen Security Forum on Wednesday that investigations of Chinese espionage are open in all 50 states.
“I think China, from a counterintelligence perspective, in many ways, represents the broadest, most challenging, most significant threat we face as a country,” he said.
Wray explained the threat is so massive because it represents a “whole state effort” by China.
“It is economic espionage, as well as traditional espionage, it is nontraditional collectors, as well as traditional intelligence operatives, it’s human sources, as well as cyber means,” he said.
Wray reported the FBI’s investigations into Chinese economic espionage cover “everything from corn seeds in Iowa to wind turbines in Massachusetts and everything in between.”
The FBI director did not dismiss the threat posed by Russian espionage and its efforts to interfere with elections, but said China was the more troubling threat because it has a coherent plan to position itself as the “sole dominant superpower.”
“They’re trying to replace the US in that role and so theirs is a long-term game that’s focused on just about every industry, every quarter of society in many ways. It involves academia, it involves research and development, it involves everything from agriculture to high tech. And so theirs is a more pervasive, broader approach but in many ways more of a long-term threat to the country,” he warned.
This is not the first time Wray has issued such advisories. In March, he told NBC News“there’s no country that’s even close” to China in terms of espionage activities against the United States. He said China targeted everything from new companies to Fortune 500 firms.
NBC noted Wray has been criticized by Asian-American groups for exaggerating the threat posed by Chinese visitors and immigrants, but he defended his assessment by insisting no racial or national prejudice influenced FBI policy. “When we open investigations into economic espionage, time and time again, they keep leading back to China,” he said.
One of the specific statements that drew criticism from Asian-American groups was Wray telling the Senate Intelligence Committee in February that Chinese students enrolled in advanced science and mathematics programs posed a counterintelligence risk.
“The use of non-traditional collectors, especially in the academic setting — whether it’s professors, scientists, students — we see in almost every field office that the FBI has around the country. It’s not just in major cities. It’s in small ones as well, it’s across basically every discipline. And I think the level of naivete on the part of the academic sector about this creates its own issues,” he remarked, revealing that the FBI is investigating groups backed by the Chinese government that facilitate dialogue with American scholars.
China’s efforts have been directed against the U.S. intelligence community as well. A former clandestine CIA officer named Kevin Mallory was convicted in June of passing classified information to Chinese agents using a cell phone that turned out to have insufficient protection from FBI analysis. Mallory claimed he was actually still working for U.S. interests and was attempting to lure his Chinese handlers into a trap, but the jury rejected his argument.
The New York Times observed that Mallory was but the latest high-profile example of China attempting to recruit former U.S. intelligence officers:
In January, the F.B.I. arrested Jerry Chun Shing Lee, another former C.I.A. officer, who had repeated contacts with Chinese intelligence. He has been charged with illegally possessing classified information and conspiring to spy for the Chinese.
Last week, prosecutors charged Ron Rockwell Hansen, a former Defense Intelligence Agency case officer, with attempted espionage. The F.B.I. began investigating Mr. Hansen’s activities in 2014.
In a prescient March op-ed for the New York Times, author David Wise worried that the media’s preoccupation with Russia was obscuring “the significant inroads made by Chinese intelligence and cyberspies.” He pointed out that the Jerry Chun Shing Lee case mentioned above involved a turncoat CIA operative allegedly ratting out an American effort to infiltrate China, leading to over a dozen American assets executed or imprisoned.
“The Chinese government approaches its spycraft differently from either Russia or the United States. It is often much more patient. The Chinese may take years to develop a source and plant one inside American intelligence organizations. But they have managed to do just that inside the F.B.I., the C.I.A., the Pentagon, and the State Department,” Wise warned.
Wise quoted former FBI analyst Paul Moore’s colorful explanation of China’s approach to intelligence operations:
If a beach were a target, the Russians would send in a sub, frogmen would steal ashore in the dark of night and collect several buckets of sand and take them back to Moscow. The U.S. would send over satellites and produce reams of data. The Chinese would send in a thousand tourists, each assigned to collect a single grain of sand. When they returned, they would be asked to shake out their towels. And they would end up knowing more about the sand than anyone else.
The State Department said this week that it is carefully “monitoring” China’s commitment to a 2015 agreement between then-President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping that cyber espionage would no longer be used for economic gain. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has accused China of repeatedly violating this agreement, although specific allegations have been prosecuted as of yet.
“There is a working consensus in U.S. circles that China’s observable theft of American firms’ [intellectual property] by cyber means has decreased but not gone away,” an industry source told the Washington Examiner on Tuesday.
WATCH: Hillary Clinton vows to “strengthen” Russia (and more!)
Turn on any cable news channel, and Russia is all the mainstream media can talk about. Every liberal outlet has spent months on breathless coverage on what President Donald Trump calls a historic witch hunt.
So where was the mainstream media outrage when former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was promising to “strengthen” Russia… just one year their hackers had meddled in the 2008 presidential election?
In a 2010 interview for Russian television, Hillary was asked, “What is being done to make it easier for Americans to come to Russia, and for Russians to visit America?”
Imagine if Trump gave this response —
So where was the mainstream media outrage when former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was promising to “strengthen” Russia… just one year their hackers had meddled in the 2008 presidential election?
In a 2010 interview for Russian television, Hillary was asked, “What is being done to make it easier for Americans to come to Russia, and for Russians to visit America?”
Imagine if Trump gave this response —
Well, we want to encourage a lot more travel, and a lot more exchanges. And as we move forward and we get more experience between our two countries and facilitate business travel, tourism travel, education travel – every kind of travel – I think it will become, at least I hope, easier and easier.
Many of our businesses want to have their business leaders come and have open ended visas… and, similarly, a lot of Russians want to come [to the U.S.] and have as much time as they need. That’s what I would like to work for.
We want very much to have a strong Russia, because a strong, confident, prosperous, and stable Russia, we think, is in the interest of the world.
Many of our businesses want to have their business leaders come and have open ended visas… and, similarly, a lot of Russians want to come [to the U.S.] and have as much time as they need. That’s what I would like to work for.
We want very much to have a strong Russia, because a strong, confident, prosperous, and stable Russia, we think, is in the interest of the world.
“One of the fears that I hear from Russia is that somehow the United States wants Russia to be weak,” Clinton added, according to The Daily Wire. “That could not be farther from the truth. Our goal is to help strengthen Russia.”
Imagine the utter chaos if Trump said the same thing?
There would be riots in the streets. News commentators would be screaming at the top of their lungs!
But when Hillary says that one of the goals of former President Barack Obama’s administration is to “strengthen” Russia, where was the outrage? There was none.
It should be noted, this interview occurred during the controversial Uranium One deal, where Russia was purchasing control of 20% of the United States strategic uranium supply – a deal signed off on by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The Clinton Foundation was also receiving multimillion dollar donations by the Russian government and oligarchs during this exchange.
You can watch Hillary’s response for yourself below —
Imagine the utter chaos if Trump said the same thing?
There would be riots in the streets. News commentators would be screaming at the top of their lungs!
But when Hillary says that one of the goals of former President Barack Obama’s administration is to “strengthen” Russia, where was the outrage? There was none.
It should be noted, this interview occurred during the controversial Uranium One deal, where Russia was purchasing control of 20% of the United States strategic uranium supply – a deal signed off on by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The Clinton Foundation was also receiving multimillion dollar donations by the Russian government and oligarchs during this exchange.
You can watch Hillary’s response for yourself below —
Ryan Saavedra 
✔@RealSaavedraIn a 2010 interview on Russian television, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that the Obama administration wanted travel and business to increase between Russia and America and that the Obama administration wanted to "help strengthen Russia."
Just two years later, former President Barack Obama was caught in an embarrassing hot mic incident communicating a secret message to Russian dictator Vladimir Putin that he wanted cooperation leading into the 2012 election.
G’ day…Ciao…Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2018/07/www_20.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment