- Hallo friendsCAPITAL STORIES FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article ADVENTURE, Article ANIMATION, Article LATEST DONGENG, Article WORLD OF ANIMALS, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title :
link :

Baca juga


WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.
BLOGOESPOT.COM
Thursday, August 23, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****

THE LIBERTY DAILY


DISGUSTING! NY Times Deletes Illegal Status of Mollie Tibbetts’ Illegal Alien Killer From Headline

DISGUSTING! NY Times Deletes Illegal Status of Mollie Tibbetts’ Illegal Alien Killer From Headline

We Are All Mollie Tibbetts Today — Our Country Mourns Senseless Murder Committed by an Undocumented Democrat

We Are All Mollie Tibbetts Today — Our Country Mourns Senseless Murder Committed by an Undocumented Democrat




To turn America back toward freedom, Jim Jordan for speaker

Jen Kuznicki  Jim Jordan's big smileBill Clark | Getty Images
If the Republicans win in November, there is no question that Jim Jordan should be speaker of the House.

Jordan is a founder of the House Freedom Caucus. Somehow, though, operatives and the media have cast aspersions on the House Freedom Caucus, letting their annoyance be known every time the caucus acts for more liberty. But is freedom some sort of annoyance, or is it all that we live for?

The ideological opposite of the Freedom Caucus in the Republican Party is the Tuesday Group, formed to work to stop the greatest modern example of a take-charge House effort by Newt Gingrich and the ’94 Republicans who made the infamous “Contract with America.” So far, the co-chair of the Tuesday Group, Elise Stefanik, has chimed in on the race for speaker and backed Kevin McCarthy. But is that what the patriotic Republican voters want: People who will stand in the way of giving power back to the people and freedom for all?

With Jordan, Republicans and conservatives alike can unite in the quintessential struggle of our times: the fight for freedom or the fall into the desperation of socialism and the failure of America’s grand experiment.

This is no time to continue with the old ideas of “next in line” status quo. With such a historic election, certainly, the mood of the American people is not to gravitate to the “next in line,” nor is it “Speaker Pelosi.”

The midterms are going to be tough. The excitement and the efforts on the Democratic side to deliver a blow to the Trump administration are palpable. So what are we going to do about it?
For one, we can have a plan that reminds voters why they are Americans. It’s a shame that because of the retiring speaker, the rank-and-file Republicans seemingly have no united stand from the leadership of the House. If a modern Contract with America were drawn up, with special emphasis on freedom for all, tightening our belts, a booming economy, and defense of the nation, our homes, and our liberties, better unity could be achieved.

Secondly, we must turn the Democrats against themselves. After all, isn’t just about everyone fed up with the Democrats controlling the media and spewing hate and poison across the airwaves? What is not heard about very much is the division within the Democrat Party. The alt-left progressive upstarts are upset about the status quo, yet they seem to be losing to the establishment. Their golden child Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez can’t even get an endorsement from Obama. David Hogg, a white male, is disparaging Nancy Pelosi, the first woman speaker of the House. Republicans should remind progressive upstarts that the establishment doesn’t want them telling everybody what’s happening, in an effort to get them to shut up and sit down. We should also remind the establishment-type Democrats that their agenda, the nastiness, the Antifa violence, the hatred of police, the identity politics is out in the open now for all to see. No more hiding behind lofty rhetoric. The plan for government jackbooted control of our lives is for all to see, and we’ll remind them that when Americans reject it, they’ll have their crazed, out-for-blood base to thank.

Third, we have to call our Republican House members and prospective members and urge them to vote for Jim Jordan. Nothing ever goes the grassroots’ way without massive work from the grassroots.

And finally, we have to vote and identify ten people, at least, to bring to the polls with us. As is always the case, the Democrats bring in busloads, while the Republicans depend on campaign workers. It’s never enough.

If you value your freedom like all the great Americans who passed before us, we need to execute these steps to keep the House and to actually elect a speaker who truly has American freedom in mind.



ELIZABETH WARREN WEEPS FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AFTER MOLLIE TIBBETT’S MURDER

Christopher Smith | Contributor
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren protested the treatment of illegal immigrants following the murder of Mollie Tibbetts during an interview with CNN on Wednesday.
“The person who allegedly murdered her [Tibbetts] is an undocumented immigrant. Mike Pence and the president have suggested the laws need to be stronger so people like this were not in the country,” CNN’s John Berman told Warren.
The Senator very quickly expressed her condolences to the Tibbetts family before pivoting to a more broad topic on how the United States treats illegal immigrants.
“Last month, I went down to the border, and I saw where children had been taken away from their mothers. I met with their mothers who had been lied to, who didn’t know where their children were, and there was no plan for how they would be reunified with their children,” Warren said.
“I think we need immigration laws that focus on people who pose a real threat, and I don’t think mamas and babies are the place we should be spending our resources. Separating a mama from a baby does not make this country safer,” Warren concluded.
Elizabeth Warren is currently up for re-election in Massachusetts and is tampering down expectations that she is gearing up for a 2020 presidential run.



THE MEDIA IS ANGRY THAT FOX IS COVERING THE MOLLIE TIBBETTS MURDER

Amber Athey | Media and Breaking News Editor
Members of the media are criticizing Fox News for choosing to air a police press conference on the murder of missing Iowa college student Mollie Tibbetts.
Journalists suggested that it was “amazing” that Fox would give the story any airtime given the other breaking news stories about former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort being convicted of bank fraud and former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen pleading guilty to campaign finance violations.
Beth Fertig, a reporter for WNYC, falsely claimed that Fox News opened their 5 p.m. hour with the Tibbetts case.
Beth Fertig @bethfertig
And @FoxNews is leading it's 5 p.m. newscast with police news conference on missing Iowa student Mollie Tibbets
A review of TV clipping service Grabien reveals that Fox actually led their newscast with the Manafort news, spent a little over two minutes on a press conference about the Tibbetts murder, and then continued coverage on the Cohen case.
Maxwell Strachan, a Huffington Post reporter, sounded off when Fox went back to the Tibbetts case later in the hour. The suspect in the Tibbetts case is an illegal immigrant.

It's 5:30 p.m., and Fox News has moved on from the Manafort-Cohen news -- back to the death of Mollie Tibbetts, who authorities believe was killed by an undocumented immigrant
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes agreed that it is “amazing” that Fox broke into the Manafort and Cohen news in order to give their viewers updates on the brutal murder of a 20-year-old Iowa college student who had been missing for a month.
This is really pretty amazing

Fox News has been giving the public updates about the Tibbetts case since she went missing and has interviewed members of her family.



Poll: Dems' Lead in Generic House Race Is Shrinking
Image: Poll: Dems' Lead in Generic House Race Is Shrinking
By Jeffrey Rodack   

The Democrats’ lead over Republicans in a generic House ballot is down to 5 points, according to a new Monmouth University poll.
Forty-eight percent say if the election for the House was held today, they would back or lean toward supporting the Democratic candidate in their district. Forty-three percent would favor the Republican in the race.
Here’s how that compares to past Monmouth University polls:
  • 48 percent favored the Democratic candidate in June, compared to 41 percent who supported the Republican.
  • 49 percent back the Democrat in April, compared to 41 percent who favored the Republican.
  • 50 percent supported the Democrat in March, while 41 percent backed the Republican.
“While the overall generic ballot gap has gone from 9 points to 5 points over the past five months it is not clear whether this is significant movement toward the GOP given the poll’s margin of error,” said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.
“But these results do tell us that the Democrats have not been able to capitalize on anti-incumbent sentiment to break away from the Republicans on a national level.”
These are some other highlights from the poll released on Wednesday:
  • 61 percent say having experience in government and politics is a positive quality for a candidate for Congress, while 22 percent see it as a negative.
  • 52 percent say they would be more likely to support a congressional candidate who was a political outsider, compared to 25 percent who say they would support a political insider.
  • 28 percent rate healthcare policy the most important issue in deciding who to vote for in a congressional race and 19 percent say economic policy; 18 percent say immigration policy and 13 percent say gun control policy.
The poll, conducted August 15-19, surveyed 805 people. The poll’s margin of error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

  1. We Are All Mollie Tibbetts Today — Our Country Mourns This Senseless Murder
    When evil touches some of our youngest Americans, 'we are particularly outraged' about it, one Iowan told LifeZette
    By Mom Zette Sta

There was hope, initially, that Mollie Tibbetts, the 20-year-old Iowa college student who went missing last month, would be found alive.
Maybe she had left on her own accord (though unlikely) — or maybe someone holding her against her will had just gotten in too deep and was trying to figure a way out.
Maybe there was some huge mistake, some vast misunderstanding, somehow, and all would be explained.
Tragically, none of these scenarios was the case.
The breaking news on Tuesday flooded across televisions, phones and radios, stunning Americans everywhere: Mollie Tibbetts, the bright, beautiful young woman with a loving family and the rest of her life ahead of her, was dead — her body left in an Iowa cornfield, her body covered with cornhusks, so sadly symbolic of the state she called home.
It is no way for a young life in this country to end, no way for anyone’s life, no matter his or her background, to end — and the hearts of Americans everywhere broke as we heard the news.
Worse still came the news that someone who had entered this country illegally had reportedly stalked her as she jogged, frightened her during what would be her last minutes on this earth — and is now charged with murder.
It brought to the minds of many another life that ended so violently almost three years ago exactly — Kate Steinle, 32, killed in 2015 by an illegal alienon a pier in San Francisco, by a gunshot to the head.
From a metropolitan West Coast city to the rural cornfields of Iowa, illegal immigrants who committed heinous crimes changed two American families forever. The potential contributions to this country by two lives will now forever go unfulfilled.
It’s far from just two families or two circles of people that are affected by these vicious acts, of course. Crime — whether it’s the illegal drugs that so many Americans are addicted to, or human trafficking, or rampant gang activity, or murder — all of these travesties weaken the collective fabric of America.
Their cost is counted in broken lives, broken hearts and broken dreams, in the big cities, small towns, and everywhere else across this nation.
“The world is getting smaller and Iowa is no different,” one man from that state wrote to LifeZette after hearing the news that Mollie Tibbetts’ dead body had been found and that an illegal alien had been charged with her murder.
“These things happen everywhere, but here in Iowa, we aren’t resigned to that. We are still shocked, still scared, still deeply offended when these things happen in our little corner of the world.”
We must keep up the fight for the toughest of immigration policies and law enforcement directives that demand that those who come to this country do so legally.
He continued, “We are particularly outraged when evil touches our young people. I think of the opening to one of my favorite songs, ‘As I walk through this wicked world’ (from Elvis Costello’s ‘What’s So Funny ‘Bout Peace Love and Understanding?’). Seems like we are living that now, in Iowa.”
For the Tibbetts family, the grief is only just beginning, of course, and prayers from Americans everywhere go up for their comfort and peace in the time of their mourning.
For Americans, there needs to be a firm resolve to fight illegal immigration despite the clamor of calls from those who refuse to see the continued carnage and pain — and instead fight for the rights of non-Americans over the rights of legal citizens.



Mark Levin: ‘Donald Trump Is in the Clear’ — ‘Lanny Davis Blew It,’ ‘You Are a Dummy, Lanny’
Tuesday on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” conservative talker and legal expert Mark Levin criticized the plea deal Michael Cohen made with the prosecutor for the Southern District of New York regarding campaign finance law violations.
Levin argued Cohen pled guilty to the charge despite them not being offenses and at the behest of the prosecutor who insisted they were offenses.
Partial transcript as follows:
HANNITY: All right, Mark, I mean, there are some lessons here. I agree that you shouldn’t lie to the FBI. Everyone agrees with that. I also agree that you should pay your taxes. I also agree that you better not lie on a bank loan application. Mark, how did we get from Russia and that this is it after nearly, we are almost at 500 days.
LEVIN: All right. I want to address Michael Cohen. How did we get to that? I want to help the law professors, the constitutional experts, the criminal defense lawyers, the former prosecutors and of course, the professors. I want to help them understand what the law is.
The general counsel for the Clinton mob family, Lanny Davis, he had his client pleaded two counts of criminality that don’t exist. These campaign finance violations that is all over TV, they are saying implicates the president of the United States directly.
First, let’s back up. It is a guilty plea. It is a plea bargain between a prosecutor and a criminal. A criminal who doesn’t want to spend the rest of his life in prison. That is not precedent. That applies only to that specific case. Nobody cites plea bargains for precedent. That’s number one.
Number two, just because a prosecutor says that somebody violated a campaign law doesn’t make it so. He is not the judge. He is not the jury. We didn’t adjudicate anything. It never went to court. That’s number two.
A campaign expenditure under our federal campaign laws is an expenditure solely for campaign activity. A candidate who spends his own money or even corporate money for an event that occurred not as a result of the campaign, it is not a campaign expenditure.
Let me give a few examples to help people understand this, especially the American people. Let’s say, I wrote these down. Let’s say a candidate had said we owe vendors a whole lot of money. We’ve had disputes with them. But I want you to go ahead and pay them. I’m a candidate, I don’t want all this negative publicity.
So he says to his private lawyer, you pay them, I’ll reimburse you, get it done. Is that illegal? It’s perfectly legal.
Yet according to the prosecution of the Southern District of New York it’s paid at the direction of the candidate to influence the election. Yes, Mr. Prosecutor, how stupid is your point? It’s not a crime.
More, let’s say that this candidate settles a lawsuit that was initiated before he becomes a candidate. And he says to his personal lawyer, I want you to pay, settle that lawsuit. You can use my corporate funds, my private funds, whatever it is. That is perfectly legal, too.
The prosecutor would say, but that influenced the election. So what? There are certain things you do that influence an election that are legal and certain things you do to influence an election that are illegal.
Let’s say a candidate gets a non-disclosure agreement from a disgruntled employee, and he wants to quiet that disgruntled employee as he goes into the election. He pays the funds out of his pocket or through his corporation. Perfectly legal.
Nothing here was spent out of the campaign. Nothing was done with the campaign or to the campaign. This is exactly what the federal law is.
And Mr. Lanny Davis had his client plead guilty to two offenses that aren’t offenses that the prosecutor insisted were offenses. That’s why he is no good. That is Michael Cohen against Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is in the clear. Let’s say Donald Trump even directed Michael Cohen to make payments in non-disclosure agreements. So what? He is allowed to do that.
Now, here’s my question. Has the Southern District of New York ever paid money in a non-disclosure agreement with any of its employees? How about any U.S. attorney’s office in the United States? How about the Department of Justice? How about any business?
HANNITY: Or Congress.
LEVIN: How about any union? How about the DNC? How about a member of Congress? It’s done all the time. It is all hush money. And all of this hush money, they can’t pay hush money. Well, it is hush money. It’s legal. It’s a contract. It’s done all the time.
Now, what does Mr. Mueller have left? It’s worked. He is chasing the Manhattan madam. Who the hell is the Manhattan madam? I don’t know. And how is he interviewing? He is dragging her in front of the grand jury.
What’s next? The Manhattan madam. He’s got — he’s got Manafort where he wants him on banking charges, he set up a few guys like Flynn who has gotten in trouble. Now they have Cohen. What do they have? They have nothing. I’ll tell you what they have.
Mr. Mueller as a federal prosecutor is preparing his impeachment report which is an unconstitutional activity. Mr. Mueller is supposed to be non-political. He is not supposed to preparing impeachment report.
Mr. Mueller, I told you before, you can’t indict a sitting president. I told you that 15 months ago. Now you figured it out. You and Rosenstein figured it out. Now you and Rosenstein are trying to figure out what to do with the subpoena.
You see, Sean, Giuliani was on your show the other day or somebody’s show and said why do they take two or three weeks? I’ll tell you why they take two or three weeks. Because Mr. Mueller has to consult Mr. Rosenstein, his boss, to figure out what to do with the subpoena.
I’ll tell you what happens when they issue that subpoena. The president of the United States takes it all the way to the Supreme Court. And what does he cite? Department of Justice memos. What else does he cite? The Constitution of the United States.
So this is going to be an impeachment battle in the end. The president of the United States if he doesn’t get involved in the perjury trap — think about that. They don’t have a crime. He needs this interview to create a crime against the president of the United States. This prosecutor.
Well, that’s pretty damn outrageous. So, in any event, I want the news media to understand. You know what took place in the Southern District of New York? Nothing that matters. Zippo.
HANNITY: You know what, Mark?
LEVIN: There was no violation of the federal campaign laws. Lanny Davis blew it. Lanny Davis — Lanny Davis he puts out a tweet today. “Today, Cohen stood up and testified under oath that Donald Trump directed him to commit a crime.”
You are a dummy, Lanny.
“By making payments to two women for the principal purpose of influencing an election. If those payments were a crime for Michael Cohen then why wouldn’t they be a crime for Donald Trump?”
They weren’t a crime for Michael Cohen. He screwed himself. And they’re not a crime for Donald Trump either. Now move along and go back into your corner with Hillary Clinton.
Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor


Senate Dem: ‘We are in a Watergate moment’
BY BRETT SAMUELS  

Senate Dem: ‘We are in a Watergate moment’
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said late Tuesday the country is in a "Watergate moment" after two of President Trump's former associates were implicated in court within minutes of each other."We're in a Watergate moment. We need bipartisanship now more than ever to protect the special counsel and to stop, and I must underscore stop, any consideration of pardons," Blumenthal said on CNN.

"We're likely to see a firestorm of resistance from the president of the United States," Blumenthal added.

Blumenthal expressed concern that Trump may act out after his former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty to eight counts in Manhattan court, and indicated the president directed him to break campaign finance laws.

In a Virginia courthouse, a jury also found former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort guilty on eight of 18 counts. The jury could not come to a unanimous verdict on the other 10 counts.

A pardon for Manafort in particular, Blumenthal said, would "so undermine the credibility of his office that it would be a disaster for the nation."

"It would very possibly be an obstruction of justice because he would be misusing that power to protect himself as a target of that investigation," Blumenthal said, adding that Republicans will need to stand up to Trump.

The White House previously would not rule out the possibility that Cohen could receive a pardon could be offered down the road.

Trump largely avoided talking about either of his former associates at a campaign rally in West Virginia hours after the courtroom drama took place, other than to deny there was any collusion with Russia in the 2016 election and rail against the "witch hunt" in reference to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.



Somebody Arrest James Woods, This Beatdown of Chuck Schumer Is Going to Leave a Mark

Chuck Schumer took the opportunity to blast President Trump for revoking security clearances or threatening to revoke them, equating him to a dictator.
It took conservative actor James Woods all of one tweet to explain to him that the comparison is ridiculous.
From the Senate floor, Schumer declared: “The abuse of the powers of public office to silence critics, punish political enemies is exactly what goes on in dictatorships in banana republics.”
The congressman was addressing the situation with former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director John Brennan being stripped of his security clearance by the President.
Woods offered his take on such a claim, reminding Schumer of what really happens in a dictatorship.
Senator Rand Paul originally demanded Brennan have his security clearance revoked because he allegedly had been profiting off of it, divulging secrets in his role as an analyst in the media. President Trump finally agreed to do so last week.
Schumer didn’t quite see it as a means to clean up the mess created by Obama-era officials, instead referring to it as a “gratuitous act of political retribution taken out of spite and malice.”
“It was an attempt to silence critics of the president, something the president regularly tries to do usually unsuccessfully,” he said.
Schumer keeps using that word ‘dictator,’ but I don’t think he knows what it means.
Meanwhile, the President continues to clean house, threatening to remove other corrupt officials security clearances, including Bruce Ohr and James Clapper.
He also went after former Intelligence Official Phillip Mudd, following his unhinged rant in which the now-CNN panelist berated a black Trump supporter and ordered him off the set when he dared to confront him with facts.
Trump did, however, deny a report that he had considered revoking Barack Obama’s access to intelligence briefings.

Fake News, of which there is soooo much (this time the very tired New Yorker) falsely reported that I was going to take the extraordinary step of denying Intelligence Briefings to President Obama. Never discussed or thought of!
7:10 AM - Aug 21, 2018

G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier


Thus Article

That's an article This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2018/08/www_22.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

Related Posts :

0 Response to " "

Post a Comment