Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.
BLOGOESPOT.COM
Thursday, August 23, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Our thanks to John N. for the following ‘essay’.
"I MISS BILL"
Whatever party you belong to, this is funny political humor from a Canadian TV show where a black comedian said he misses Bill Clinton...
"Yep, that's right - I miss Bill Clinton!"
He was the closest thing we ever got to having a real black man as President.
He plays the saxophone.
Hesmoked weed.
He had his way with ugly white women.
Even now? Look at him .... his wife works, and he doesn't.
And, he gets a check from the government every month.
Manufacturers announced today that they will be stocking America's shelves this week with "Clinton Soup," in honor of one of the nations' distinguished men. It consists primarily of a weenie in hot water.
Chrysler Corporation is adding a new car to its line to honor Bill Clinton. The Dodge Drafter will be built in Canada.
When asked what he thought about foreign affairs, Clinton replied, "I don't know, I never had one."
The Clinton revised judicial oath:
"I solemnly swear to tell the truth as I know it, the whole truth as I believe it to be, and nothing but what I think you need to know."
Clinton will be recorded in history as the only President to have sex in the Oval Office between the Bushes.
ONE OF THE MOST ENCOURAGING EVENTS YOU WILL NOT SEE, OR HEAR MUCH ABOUT IN THE PRINT-PRESS, OR ON TELEVISION...
Neil Gorsuch has only been on the Supreme Court for a short while. Recently he ignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he refused to join the SCOTUS 'cert pool.
The cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term. In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court's law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial. The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices. It also, in theory, allows 3rd parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate. Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the discretion of legal clerks. This is the kind of story everyone should be hearing or reading in the media, but obviously is not.
Today the United States Supreme Court issued a direct and final blow to the Islamic Indoctrination of the young in this nation.
The full panel of the United States Supreme Court which consists of 9 judges met to decide the fate of Islamic indoctrination in our American public schools. In a typical 5 X 4 decision, common sense won out, and we have sanity restored to our schools once again.
The United States Supreme Court was able to hand out this decision banning Sharia Law and Islam from being taught in classrooms because of the tie-breaking vote of the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Gorsuch went on to write about the decision:
'The government certainly has no business being involved in religion, but this isn't a government issue or a religious issue. This is about the judicial branch interpreting the laws as they apply to the teaching of religion. We shouldn't be teaching any religions in the public schools of this country."
Amen, Justice Gorsuch, Amen!
This should have been a unanimous decision, not 5 to 4, but it seems like the 4 liberal judges on the Supreme Court don't care about the Constitution, nor our values.
Perhaps this is the start of restoring America to its founding glory.
Thank GOD for our new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch--- a great selection by President Trump.
THE LIBERTY DAILY
Five Other Heinous Illegal Alien Crimes You Didn’t Hear About This Week
Manafort Case Juror Speaks Out: ‘Certainly Mr. Manafort Got Caught Breaking the Law, But He Wouldn’t Have Gotten Caught if They Weren’t After President Trump
’https://www.deltanews.tv/news/national/juror-from-paul-manafort-trial-speaks-out/video_879710ff-cc9d-5f39-8d3c-13542bcd481e.html
Hypocrite! Elizabeth Warren reveals a dirty little secret
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren has a dirty little secret.
The self-appointed champion of the people that claims she wants to raise the government’s taxes on the wealthy and redistribute their income to the lower class?
She’s worth up to $10 million dollars.
She has been firmly in the one-percent for over a decade — and yet she still qualifies for tens of thousands of dollars in tax returns every year.
Critics say Warren’s surprise move to release her federal and state returns on Wednesday is a clear signal that the Massachusetts liberal is laying the groundwork for a run for president in 2020.
So how much money does Warren make every year? It might surprise you.
The woman who once said she wants to raise income taxes up to 90 percent for some Americans is rolling in cash.
Warren’s 2017 federal returns show the former Harvard University law professor and her husband, Bruce Mann, reported an adjusted gross income of $913,000. The returns listed their total tax as $268,484, and the couple was eligible for a refund of almost $34,000.
The salary for a U.S. senator is $174,000.
Although she’s frequently mentioned as a possible White House contender, Warren has said she’s focused on her Senate re-election campaign this year. She first won election in 2012 by defeating then incumbent Republican Sen. Scott Brown.
Warren has burnished her credentials among the liberal wing of the Democratic party by frequently sparring with Republican President Donald Trump.
In addition to her salary as a senator, Warren reported $430,370 in income from her writing in 2017. Warren has written or co-written several books, mostly about how she’s a champion of the middle class and poor. Her latest “This Fight Is Our Fight: The Battle to Save America’s Middle Class” was published last year.
The couple’s income has fluctuated from year to year, but has remained sky-high. In 2016 the couple reported an adjusted gross income of $717,000. During that year, Warren reported income of $224,000 from “consulting, lecturing, writing, investing.”
In 2014, Warren and her husband reported a far higher adjusted gross income of more than $1.5 million. That year, Warren reported a net profit of more than $1 million from consulting, lecturing, writing and investing.
The couple has lost considerable amounts on investments: $217,217 in 2008 when they sold holdings in Sentinel Investments and $91,270 the next year on the sale of Dreyfus Third Century fund. However, their tax returns list very little wealth overall in stocks, with IBM dividends growing to $3,621 by 2012 but divested by 2013.
Warren is unopposed in the Democratic primary in Massachusetts. Three Republicans are competing in the Sept. 4 contest for the chance to challenge Warren in November.
GOP Senate candidates on primary day:
GEOFF DIEHL, 10 Village Way, Whitman
JOHN KINGSTON, 16 Chestnut St., Winchester
BETH JOYCE LINDSTROM, 161 Wharton Row, Groton
More on the Faux Native American, Elizabeth Warren below:
Angel Mom Fires Back At Elizabeth Warren’s Shameful Comments
Angel Mom Fires Back At Elizabeth Warren’s Shameful Comments
An angel mother has fired back at Elizabeth Warren for her comments on the murder of Mollie Tibbetts. Fox News reports:
The mother of a man killed by an illegal immigrant ripped Sen. Elizabeth Warren for calling for a solution to “real problems” with the American immigration system.
The Massachusetts Democrat made the remark on CNN’s “New Day” on Wednesday in the wake of the Mollie Tibbetts tragedy.
Cristhian Rivera, a 24-year-old illegal immigrant from Mexico, has been charged with first-degree murder in the death of the 20-year-old Iowa college student, who was reported missing more than a month ago. Tibbetts body was found in an Iowa cornfield on Tuesday.
“I’m so sorry for the family here,” Warren said, adding that “one of the things we have to remember is that we need an immigration system that is effective, that focuses on where real problems are.”
Another disgraceful attempt at the Left to ignore the threat of illegal aliens and their crimes.
As the old indian chief was heard to say: Squaw Warren is full of oomgalagala.
DNC Makes Big Mistake
The Democratic National Committee recently called the FBI to report that someone was trying to hack them. But apparently their claims were false and they were forced to issue a retraction.
According to The Daily Wire:
The Democratic National Committee contacted the FBI on Wednesday claiming that someone tried to hack its voter database system this week, and, within hours, had to retract their claim.
The New York Times reported that officials described the alleged attempt to hack their system, Votebuilder, as an "aggressive" attack, claiming that the "hackers set up a fake page that mimicked the party’s login page for its voter-registration website, a tactic that could gather names, passwords and other credentials of those using the voter database."
…
Late on Wednesday, Democrats were forced to retract their claims after new information came to light and now say that the alleged "hacking attempt" was nothing more than a "test."
"We, along with the partners who reported the site, now believe it was built by a third party as part of a simulated phishing test on VoteBuilder," Lord said in a new statement. "The test, which mimicked several attributes of actual attacks on the Democratic party's voter file, was not authorized by the DNC, VoteBuilder nor any of our vendors."
The DNC tried to show that they were being targeted by hackers again, but they were just crying wolf. The world is not out to get them, they just seem to think so.
According to The Daily Wire:
The Democratic National Committee contacted the FBI on Wednesday claiming that someone tried to hack its voter database system this week, and, within hours, had to retract their claim.
The New York Times reported that officials described the alleged attempt to hack their system, Votebuilder, as an "aggressive" attack, claiming that the "hackers set up a fake page that mimicked the party’s login page for its voter-registration website, a tactic that could gather names, passwords and other credentials of those using the voter database."
…
Late on Wednesday, Democrats were forced to retract their claims after new information came to light and now say that the alleged "hacking attempt" was nothing more than a "test."
"We, along with the partners who reported the site, now believe it was built by a third party as part of a simulated phishing test on VoteBuilder," Lord said in a new statement. "The test, which mimicked several attributes of actual attacks on the Democratic party's voter file, was not authorized by the DNC, VoteBuilder nor any of our vendors."
The DNC tried to show that they were being targeted by hackers again, but they were just crying wolf. The world is not out to get them, they just seem to think so.
Manafort Juror Drops Bomb On Mueller Probe
In a recent interview, one juror from the Paul Manafort trial gave her thoughts on the Mueller investigation. This is an interesting perspective seeing as this is a woman who sat through the whole Manafort trial and ultimately found him guilty.
NORTHERN VIRGINIA – Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team was one holdout juror away from winning a conviction against Paul Manafort on all 18 counts of bank and tax fraud, juror Paula Duncan told Fox News in an exclusive interview Wednesday.
“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, said. She added that Mueller’s team of prosecutors often seemed bored, apparently catnapping during parts of the trial.
…
Duncan described herself as an avid supporter of President Trump, but said she was moved by four full boxes of exhibits provided by Mueller’s team – though she was skeptical about prosecutors' motives in the financial crimes case.
“Certainly Mr. Manafort got caught breaking the law, but he wouldn’t have gotten caught if they weren’t after President Trump,” Duncan said of the special counsel’s case, which she separately described as a “witch hunt to try to find Russian collusion,” borrowing a phrase Trump has used in tweets more than 100 times.
Duncan also opined that Manafort deserved a 'tax-audit' not a criminal prosecution.
The Pantsuit That Cried Wolf
Ann Coulter
“It was one person who kept the verdict from being guilty on all 18 counts,” Duncan, 52, said. She added that Mueller’s team of prosecutors often seemed bored, apparently catnapping during parts of the trial.
…
Duncan described herself as an avid supporter of President Trump, but said she was moved by four full boxes of exhibits provided by Mueller’s team – though she was skeptical about prosecutors' motives in the financial crimes case.
“Certainly Mr. Manafort got caught breaking the law, but he wouldn’t have gotten caught if they weren’t after President Trump,” Duncan said of the special counsel’s case, which she separately described as a “witch hunt to try to find Russian collusion,” borrowing a phrase Trump has used in tweets more than 100 times.
Duncan also opined that Manafort deserved a 'tax-audit' not a criminal prosecution.
The Pantsuit That Cried Wolf
Ann Coulter
If you’ve ever wondered how Russia became America’s most fearsome enemy, long after that country gave up Communism, gulags, forced starvations and mass murder (all of which liberals were cool with), the answer is: This crackpot idea came from the same woman who blamed a “vast right-wing conspiracy” for Monica Lewinsky.
The Russia conspiracy is classic Hillary, as detailed in my new book, Resistance Is Futile!: How the Trump-Hating Left Lost Its Collective Mind.
Throughout her long and blemished public career, Hillary has always blamed her troubles on bad people conspiring against her.
When her husband’s mistress, Gennifer Flowers, stepped forward as Bill Clinton was running for president in 1992, Hillary blamed a former gubernatorial opponent of her husband, who “has now spent the last two years doing everything he can to try to get even, and it’s a sort of sad spectacle.”
Bill later admitted to the affair.
When Hillary callously fired long-serving White House travel office employees to make room for her friends’ travel business, she responded to the public outcry by accusing the head of the travel office, Billy Dale, of embezzlement. To continue the charade, her husband’s government criminally prosecuted Dale. The jury acquitted him after about three minutes of deliberation, but Dale was left jobless and nearly bankrupt.
When Hillary’s health care bill went down in flames, hurting the Democrats and leading to the first Republican Congress in 40 years, she blamed the media for having “bought into the right-wing attack.” (You know how the media slavishly repeat conservative talking points.)
As mentioned above, when her husband was caught for the millionth time molesting the help, Hillary blamed a “vast right-wing conspiracy.”
When DNA proved the story was true, Hillary blamed the fuss in the media on “prejudice against our state” — meaning Arkansas. “They wouldn’t be doing this if we were from some other state,” she said. Even The San Francisco Chronicle hooted at that one.
When she lost to Obama in 2008, she blamed the media’s rampant sexism. In fact, a ham-handed liar like Hillary could only have survived in politics as long as she did thanks to the media’s devotion to her.
Quiz: When the Democratic National Committee’s emails popped up on Wikileaks in July 2016, embarrassing her campaign and enraging Democrats, would Hillary:
A) Apologize to Bernie Sanders for the DNC’s horrible mistreatment of him;
B) Demand an accounting of the inept computer security measures at the DNC;
Or
C) Invent a story about Russia conspiring against her?
Answer: C. Russia had to become the next Linda Tripp, a mysterious enemy undermining our heroine.
Hillary’s campaign manager Robby Mook launched the Russia conspiracy theory on the eve of the Democratic National Convention on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” — because who better to ask the tough questions than a former top aide to Hillary’s husband?
Mook explained:
“Well, what’s disturbing about this entire situation is that experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, took all these emails and now are leaking them out through these websites. … And it’s troubling that some experts are now telling us that this was done by — by the Russians for the purpose of helping Donald Trump.”
Stephanopoulos may not have burst out laughing, but, at the time, every serious journalist in America did. Right up until Trump drove liberals mad by winning the election, Hillary’s Russia conspiracy theory was scoffed at throughout the media.
A New York Times story described Mook’s claim as an “eerie suggestion of a Kremlin conspiracy to aid Donald Trump.” It was, the Times reporters said, a “remarkable moment.” Even at the height of the Cold War, such an accusation had never been leveled by one presidential candidate against another. And yet, the Times dryly observed, Mook had cited nothing more than unnamed “experts.”
Los Angeles Times reporter Mark Z. Barabak also pointed out the unnamed “experts” and noted that Mook’s “allegation” served two political purposes. It tainted Trump’s boast that he’d get along with Russia and “also served the added benefit, from Clinton’s perspective, of distracting from internal party divisions over the emails.”
Russian scholars and cyber-security experts dismissed the harebrained claim:
“Experts: Hard to prove Russians behind DNC hack” — USA Today
“Why the Kremlin might not be the fan of Trump that it’s said to be” — The Christian Science Monitor
A month later, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi held a conference call with nervous Democrats, urging them to push the Russian conspiracy theory and also to put out the word that “the Russians” might have altered the content of the emails.
President Obama took the alleged Russian hacking so seriously that he told Putin to “cut it out.”
It was only after disaster struck and Trump won the election that the media decided maybe there was something to that Russia business, after all.
As described in the book “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign,” two days after the election, Hillary’s communications team met for hours “to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. … Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”
The entire Russian collusion gag was invented to assuage the potty pantsuit’s embarrassment at having lost a second election that was fixed for her to win.
In the two years since the media guffawed at Mook’s claim, the public has been presented with no new evidence. All that’s changed is that the media suddenly decided to demand that we all believe it.
G’ day…Ciao…Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2018/08/www_23.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment