- Hallo friendsCAPITAL STORIES FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article ADVENTURE, Article ANIMATION, Article LATEST DONGENG, Article WORLD OF ANIMALS, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title :
link :

Baca juga


WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.
BLOGSPOT.COM
Wednesday, August 8, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
President Reagan
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Ray+Charles+America+the+Beautiful+Ronald+Reagan+Inaugural&&view=detail&mid=E571B2C81F0EF1C8742CE571B2C81F0EF1C8742C&&FORM=VRDGAR   



Liberal Logic: Feinstein Attacks Trump After Her 20-Year Personal Driver Turns Out To Be Chinese Spy
*****
Johnny Cash…


Terrible news

Jerry Remy diagnosed with cancer... again
Joe Dwinell

Jerry RemyPhoto Credit: Christopher Evans

Jerry Remy, the longtime color commentator for Red Sox broadcasts and Somerset High baseball star and solid 2nd baseman for the BoSox, has been diagnosed again with cancer.

NESN said in a statement today that  Jerry’s focus is on his medical treatment.

"The thoughts and prayers of all of us at NESN and the Red Sox are with Jerry and his family during this difficult time," the station added.

Remy had been battling lung cancer and had been out of action while going through chemotherapy. But he had bounced back.

Moe memo to Jerry: Hang in there, you’re a tough and plucky guy. Southeastern Massachusetts and all Red Sox Nation is praying and pulling for you. Jerry, take two and hit to right Jerry.


 

Voter Fraud: 670 Ballots Cast in Georgia Precinct with 276 Voters


A steady stream of voters fill the voting booths at Ronald Reagan Lodge, Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012, in West Chester, Ohio. (AP Photo/Al Behrman)AP Photo/Al Behrman

Six hundred and seventy ballots were cast in a Georgia precinct with 276 registered voters in the state’s primary election, according to the Georgia Secretary of State’s office.

A northeastern Georgia precinct located in Habersham County had 276 registered voters before the state’s primary elections at the end of May, but 670 votes were recorded—indicating that 276 percent of voters turned out in Georgia’s primary election, McClatchy reported.

The recently publicized voting irregularities come as the state investigated other instances of voter fraud—including one where an Atlanta City Hall staffer claimed she had to “print and deliver 500 blank absentee ballots” to an advocacy group staffer and pick up additional ballots from the Atlanta mayor’s campaign office to drop them off at an office in Fulton County.

Part of the reason for the increase in voter fraud claims stems from concerns about the security of Georgia’s electronic voting systems, as Georgia is one of a handful of states, including New Jersey, South Carolina, Delaware, and Louisiana, that uses electronic voting machines that do not produce a paper trail for voters to verify their ballots.

Elections experts say the lack of a paper trail makes the ballots difficult to audit.

A voter in one sworn statement said she and her husband were assigned to different polling places and city council districts even though both were registered to vote at the same address, according to McClatchy.

In other instances, voters arrived at polling places indicated on the secretary of state’s website only to be told by election officials they had to vote elsewhere.

One Atlanta Democrat even said that a voting machine gave him a ballot displaying the 5th Congressional District when he was supposed to get a ballot for the 6th Congressional district.

Harri Hursti, an election cybersecurity expert, said the incorrect ballots could have been the result of a clerical error or manipulation of voter data by hackers.

A spokesperson for the office of Georgia’s Secretary of State defended the security of the state’s ballots in a statement in response to the recent allegations of voter fraud.

Spokeswoman Candice Broce wrote in an email:

Alongside federal, local, and private sector partners, we continue to fight every day to ensure secure and accurate elections in Georgia that are free from interference. To this day, due to the vigilance, dedication, and hard work of those partners, our elections system and voting equipment remain secure.

The latest revelations of voter fraud come soon after the release of Fraud: How the Left Plans to Steal the Next Election, a new book by Eric Egger, the Government Accountability Institute’s (GAI) research director.

Egger’s book points out that voter fraud is increasingly common and encouraged by left-wing mega-donors like George Soros who support organizations that commit voter fraud. The book also notes that enough voter fraud has been documented to swing a presidential election and is enough of a problem that it could impact the 2018 midterm elections.

Disaster: Pic of Mueller Hanging With Ukrainian He’s Prosecuting Manafort Over (below)  Surfaces

The Paul Manafort trial is in full swing, and may prove to be the first chance for special counsel Robert Mueller to prove he can secure a conviction. Things aren’t looking bad for Mueller so far, particularly since former Manafort aide Rick Gates has come out to say that he helped Manafort break the law.
The former Trump campaign manager stands accused of a number of crimes, including money laundering, failure to file reports of financial accounts overseas and acting as an unregistered foreign agent. Most of this has to do with work he did for former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, a pro-Russia candidate.
The Mueller team has tried to use Manafort’s ties to Russia as part of a campaign of innuendo in the courtroom, a tactic that has drawn considerable irritation from the presiding judge. Among the things brought up by the prosecution are a loan from Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and financial accounts abroad controlled by Konstantin V. Kilimnik, who prosecutors allege has ties with Russian intelligence.
All of this, mind you, took place before Manafort became involved in the Trump campaign, where his tenure was roughly the amount of time it takes an avocado to get ripe. Let’s also note that Manafort — a former Reagan campaign worker and lobbyist — was mostly foisted upon Trump by the Republican establishment after the two sides came to the uncomfortable realization, at a late point in the primary process, that they were stuck with one another.
For a panoply of reasons, Trump quickly came to the conclusion that Manafort wasn’t the guy for him, leading to the hiring of Kellyanne Conway — a decidedly different kind of personality than Manafort’s Washington insider vibe.
But, this isn’t necessarily about all of that, even though it’s important to know for our little story. It’s about Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych.
For fans of the theory that President Donald Trump is somehow a puppet of the Kremlin, Mr. Yanukovych figures heavily. In terms of the satellite regimes Vladimir Putin has tried to set up in post-Soviet states, Yanukovych’s was one of the most transparent. Before he was deposed as part of the Ukrainian revolution in 2014 he was as reliable a pro-Russia politician as any.
It’s ironic, then, that Robert Mueller is the individual whose special counsel investigation is tackling the case:
View image on Twitter
Robert Mueller is prosecuting Manfort for doing work in Ukraine for Viktor Yanukovych back in 2013
Here is Robert Mueller hanging out in Ukraine with Viktor Yanukovych back in 2013
What is going on here?
11:15 AM - Aug 6, 2018

Regardless of how you feel about Mr. Posobiec and his promotion of various conspiracy theories, the point still bears making: Mueller worked with Yanukovych during his time as director of the FBI.
The meeting in Kiev took place two months after the Boston Marathon bombing, according to The Daily Beast, and centered around counterterrorism operations.
“Ukrainian-American cooperation efficiently develops in many spheres of mutual interest,” Yanukovych said during Mueller’s trip, according to a Facebook post from the time by the Ukraine Embassy.
“Your visit is very interesting for Ukraine and relations between our law enforcement bodies have established good traditions of cooperation and communication in the course of 20 years. I am confident that there is a potential for further broadening of cooperation.”
At the meeting, the Ukrainian leader said that he was very close to signing an agreement with the European Union.
“There are some preparations left but I hope that we will fulfill everything and sign the agreement,” Yanukovych said during the meeting, according to The Daily Beast. The agreement, which The Daily Beast describes as “a key focus of Paul Manafort’s lobbying work for Yanukovych” — was never signed.
Now, what does this mean? On paper, nothing. Mueller was the director of the FBI at the time and the Ukraine had a role to play in anti-terror efforts. However, consider the fact that this is the very swampy world of Washington, where dealing with pro-Russia strongmen is just part of the landscape.
The optics for the Democrats here are terrible, though. After all, this is the guy who Manafort’s being charged with lobbying for in a case many Trump supporters feel is being used to try and tie the administration to the Kremlin. Yet, just five years ago — long after it was apparent to every single person who cared to know the fact that he was a Kremlin stooge — Yanukovych was okay to meet with for the director of the FBI under President Barack Obama.
This is just going to galvanize Trump supporters who believe that these charges are nothing more than a Hail Mary pass by a thoroughly bankrupt investigation.
On Monday, the judge in Manafort’s case told lead prosecutor Greg D. Andres that he didn’t want to hear any more speculation about why oligarchs might have wanted to pay the lobbyist for his advice, instead advising him — as The New York Times says the judge frequently has — to “go to the heart of the matter.”
“Judge, we have been at the heart of the matter,” Andres said, exasperated.
That’s the heart of the matter for the Mueller team, apparently — and it’s why so many Americans are so skeptical.

Levin: Why Would We Throw Away Freest Nation Mankind has Ever Created for Socialism?

Gavi GreenspanBy Gavi GreenspanNationally syndicated radio talk show host, TV host, author and American lawyer Mark Levin (Screenshot)
Host Mark Levin trashed the embrace of socialism on his nationally syndicated radio program last Friday, asking his audience, “Why would we throw away the most advanced, prosperous, freest, magnificent nation mankind has ever created” for socialism.
“Why would we throw away the most advanced, prosperous, freest, magnificent nation mankind has ever created for a theory that can’t even define its fundamental terms?” asked Mark Levin. “For a theory that is so defective it has resulted in the death and/or poverty of tens of millions of people?”
https://ift.tt/2vLnAX7
“Why would we throw away the most advanced, prosperous, freest, magnificent nation mankind has ever created for a theory that can’t even define its fundamental terms? For a theory that is so defective it has resulted in the death and/or poverty of tens of millions of people? Are we so foolish, indeed, so moronic that a few people running around telling us that we can have free health care, free college, free housing, that these are human rights, are we so foolish to adopt these bumper sticker labels and arguments that we would throw away our very liberty—our very lifestyle?

“Does Bernie Sanders seem like a very sharp guy to you, a man of worldly experience? How about this 28-year-old, does she? How about most of the people who push this viewpoint?

“We know it can’t work. We know it’s an impossibility. And we also know that time is late because more and more of our citizens embrace it.”


Judge Orders DOJ to Preserve Comey’s Emails
Judicial Watch worries that former FBI chief's personal messages containing government business might be lost or destroyed
By Brendan Kirby


A federal judge has ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) not to delete the personal emails of James Comey when he was FBI director.

Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller News Foundation (DCNF) had asked for the ruling out of concern that personal emails used for FBI business might be lost or destroyed.

“The FBI has been playing shell games with Comey’s records and other records, so we’re pleased the court issued this preservation order,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement.

“This preservation order helps to ensures no Comey records are going to be lost or destroyed. We expect the DOJ to take immediate steps to make sure the records are preserved, as the court ordered,” Fitton said.

In a video posted on Judicial Watch’s Youtube page, Fitton added, “It’s been well over a year that we’ve been asking for these records, and we’ve been getting the run-around and shell games from the FBI.”

Judicial Watch had argued that there was reason to believe Comey (pictured above) used personal email to conduct official business. The watchdog group pointed to a June inspector general’s report.

“We identified numerous instances in which Comey used a personal email account (a Gmail account) to conduct FBI business,” the report states.

In response, DOJ asked Comey to preserve those records. But the agency refused to share the letter to the former FBI chief with the plaintiffs and opposed the document preservation order from the court.

The judge gave the department until September 28 to “complete its review and release of any responsive, non-exempt records to Plaintiffs.”

The judge added, “Although it contends that such an order is unnecessary, [the DOJ] has not explained why this preservation order would prejudice Defendant or cause any undue burden.”

Judicial Watch and DCNF filed the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit in April seeking:

All records written or ordered written by Comey summarizing his conversations with any of the following individuals: former President Barack Obama; former Vice President Joe Biden; 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton; Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz. Plus, all records that identify and describe meetings between Comey and Obama.

The plaintiffs said they were searching for information about whether the Obama administration misused the FBI and the Department of State totarget Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign improperly.

Fitton at the time argued that it was “all hands on deck for the Obama administration, particularly for the leadership of the FBI and State Department” when it came to “trying to destroy Donald Trump.”

Trump fired Comey in May 2017, which led Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to appoint former FBI Director Robert Mueller to serve as special counsel to investigate Russia’s interference in the 2016 campaign — including possible coordination with the Trump campaign.

Media reports have suggested that the Mueller team also is looking into whether Trump’s dismissal of Comey and other actions constitute obstruction of justice.

Meanwhile, congressional Republicans have waged a campaign for documents that might shed light on how the Russia counterintelligence probe began. Trump’s allies suspect political motivations played a role.

Brendan Kirby


The left comes unglued over Stephen Miller’s proposal to restrict number of legal immigrants coming to U.S.
Tom Tillison

Liberals are losing their ever-loving minds over a reported proposal from the Trump administration to limit the number of immigrants who obtain legal status each year.

Stephen Miller has a new target on his back after he reportedly proposed a plan to restrict legal immigrants to the U.S.

The United States currently admits over one million legal immigrants a year. Every year. A number that dwarfs all other nations in the world.

One million.

And that number does not include the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants that flow across the southern border on a regular basis, accounting for as many as 12-20 million “undocumented immigrants” — as the liberal press opts to call illegal aliens — in the country.

Citing the prerequisite anonymous sources, NBC News reported on a plan proposed by White House senior adviser Stephen Miller that “would make it harder for legal immigrants to become citizens or get green cards if they have ever used a range of popular public welfare programs, including Obamacare.”

The proposal is expected in the coming weeks and if enacted, would not have to be approved by Congress, according to NBC News.

The plan, if true, would be consistent with President Trump’s call for a merit-based immigration that serves our national interest —  a merit-based system is the law in places like Canada and Australia.

The open border crowd says the proposal would be unfair to non-citizens struggling to support their families and are dependent on government assistance, which would appear to support Trump’s stance.

NBC New included the story of a Haitian immigrant who entered the US illegally, who was “devastated” after recently being denied citizenship.

“I thought in this country everything was square and fair,” said the man who entered the country via a fake passport.

Such tug-at-the-heart stories are a staple in the news media.

The report proved to only add fodder to the already unhinged accusations that the Trump administration is racist and evil for putting the country’s best interests over the proliferation of Democratic Party party voters.

Here’s a sampling of the online onslaught targeting Stephen Miller:

Hate to make comparisons to the 1930s, but an aggressive interpretation that immigrants not be a "public charge" is exactly how the US govt blocked Jewish refugees from entering the US before WWII. Stephen Miller wants to do it again. 1/ https://t.co/FnSr5XnD8E

— Don Moynihan (@donmoyn) August 7, 2018

Don’t tell me that “all lives matter” or you believe in “Christian values” or you support “legal immigration” when Trump is adopting Stephen Miller’s new plan to block hardworking, tax paying legal immigrants with green cards from getting their citizenship. https://t.co/7oGIZjUVND

— Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) August 7, 2018

Stephen Miller is so evil The Dark Side turns to him.

— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) August 7, 2018

This is sick. Stephen Miller is sick. https://t.co/rmyJyw7Xcw

— Michael Skolnik (@MichaelSkolnik) August 7, 2018

If the worst happens and vile bigot Stephen Miller finds a way to go after legal immigrants, he won’t stop there. He will find a way to target anyone who’s not white via other discriminatory policies. https://t.co/HH1hqrWC2D

— Elizabeth Spiers (@espiers) August 7, 2018

Legal Immigrants playing by the rules? It doesn’t matter.

This administratIon changes the rules. You may now not get citizenship & even lose your residency.

Trump’s administratIon does not want you here nor does it want you to vote

https://t.co/CCdYVFeDFE

— Al Cardenas (@AlCardenasFL_DC) August 7, 2018

The great white-washing of America by Stephen Miller and white nationalists in office. This is not our country!

“it would be the biggest change to the legal immigration system in decades and estimate that more than 20 million immigrants could be affected” https://t.co/YVRrCoePc7

— Amy Siskind (@Amy_Siskind) August 7, 2018

For all of you who have remained silent during the prosecution of undocumented immigrants because it didn’t affect you. Let this be a lesson.

Stephen Miller’s next target: Legal immigrants https://t.co/8CEZmXSbZ4

— Antonio (@AntonioArellano) August 7, 2018

Stephen Miller is reportedly driving a new plan that would block immigrants living legally in the U.S. who received benefits like CHIP & food stamps from obtaining legal status in the U.S.

Once again, we are seeing policies that bear the stench of white supremacy and xenophobia. https://t.co/Ngng1SkwRW

— Kristen Clarke (@KristenClarkeJD) August 7, 2018

BREAKING: Stephen Miller still not over his senior prom date ditching him to hook up with cute foreign exchange student from Kenya

— Matt Oswalt (@MattOswaltVA)



Liberal Logic: Feinstein Attacks Trump After Her 20-Year Personal Driver Turns Out To Be Chinese Spy

BY RON CAPSHAW



Uber-liberal Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s investigation into whether then-presidential candidate Donald Trump colluded with Russia to win the presidency in 2016, lacks the moral and political authority to conduct such an investigation as she had on her staff an employee with ties to Chinese intelligence services.

This employee was not only Feinstein’s driver — a good position for espionage — but also on occasion her representative at political events she was unable to attend.

On Saturday Trump for the second time highlighted this matter and asserted that because of her driver, Feinstein should recuse herself from the Senate investigation.

“… Dianne is the person leading our Nation on ‘Collusion’ with Russia (only done by Dems). Will she now investigate herself?” Trump tweeted.

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

...Dianne is the person leading our Nation on “Collusion” with Russia (only done by Dems). Will she now investigate herself?

DRUDGE REPORT@DRUDGE_REPORT

UPDATE:  Details Of Chinese Mole By Dianne Feinstein's Side For 20 Years...
https://drudge.tw/2OFp0uQ  

11:28 PM - Aug 3, 2018

Feinstein defended herself in another tweet but in doing so did not address Trump’s essential point: that there had been a spy in her employ.

“The FBI told me 5 years ago it had concerns the China was seeking to recruit an administrative member of my Calif staff (despite no access to sensitive information). I took those concerns seriously, learned the facts and made sure the employee left my office immediately,” Feinstein tweeted.

View image on Twitter

Sen Dianne Feinstein @SenFeinstein

The FBI told me 5 years ago it had concerns that China was seeking to recruit an administrative member of my Calif staff (despite no access to sensitive information). I took those concerns seriously, learned the facts and made sure the employee left my office immediately.

3:05 PM - Aug 4, 2018

But this is not the first time a communist mole infiltrated a Democrat power-player’s staff.

In 1948, President Franklin Roosevelt’s former Vice President Henry Wallace mounted a third-party challenge to then-President Harry Truman.

Wallace openly defended Soviet dictator Josef Stalin’s imperialism during the campaign.

Republicans and Democrats at the time — among them former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt — saw a more sinister source behind Wallace’s naivete, for he had on his staff not only members of the American Communist Party but also a KGB agent.

To his credit, Wallace apparently did not know this at the time.

One can only speculate what Feinstein’s driver gathered and funneled back to Chinese intelligence — a spy can do a lot of damage from the vantage point of a front seat.

G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier



Thus Article

That's an article This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2018/08/www_38.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to " "

Post a Comment