Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY
.BLOGSPOT.COM
Sunday, October 21,2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Chuck Grassley drops HUGE Hillary bombshell (lock her up!)
“On the Holmes Front,” with Frank Holmes
It looks like Trump administration investigators are finally about to move in on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her illegal home brew e-mail server – and she’s scrambling to stay one step ahead of the cops.
The State Department stripped Hillary and five of her closest aides of their security clearances in August… but the word is just getting out.
This could be the first step toward prosecuting her – and the investigation is already underway.
“Former Secretary Clinton’s security clearance was administratively withdrawn on August 30, 2018,” the State Department said in a letter to Senator Chuck Grassley, released last Friday.
Yes, until this September, Hillary still had access to top secret, classified material!
All we can ask is, what took so long?!
Hillary lost her security clearance two years after Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said the government should shred Clinton’s access to classified information.
“I don’t think she should get classified information, and I think the (then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper) should block it given how recklessly she handled this from the start,” Ryan said in 2016.
The State Department letter announcing the move, written in September but not released until last Friday, said Hillary lost her access to the nation’s secrets “at her request.”
Hillary’s spokesman, Nick Merrill, claimed that his boss personally agreed to lose her intelligence access “quietly, so as to not allow Trump to use our national security for partisan purposes yet again. Because that’s what was in the best interest of the country.”
So, the media has decided to spin the decision as “voluntary.”
Yeah, just like former President Bill Clinton “voluntarily agreed” to relinquish his law license in 2001 – to avoid being indicted for perjury, right?
The fact is that the Trump administration is hot on Hillary’s heels – and closing in fast.
Former FBI Director James Comey made heads spin when he refused to indict Clinton for sending the most sensitive national secrets over an unsecured e-mail server in her home in Chappaqua while she was secretary of state.
Foreign intelligence assets intercepted the classified material she sent and stole national secrets, thanks to Hillary’s decision to skirt the law.
“We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account,” Comey said.
But, Comey made Republicans see red when he let her keep the security pass, giving her the right to look at the most sensitive secrets in global intelligence.
“Any other government workers who engaged in such serious offenses would, at a minimum, have their clearances suspended pending an investigation,” Grassley wrote in a 2017 letter to Foggy Bottom. “The failure to do so has given the public the impression that Secretary Clinton and her associates received special treatment.”
Grassley is a Republican – but nonpartisan servicemen who spent their whole careers in military intelligence agreed that Hillary practically handed top secret documents to foreign spies.
“That is one of the things you look at: ‘Is this person a risk?’ And yes, she was a risk,” said retired Col. James Williamson. “From that standpoint, she should have her clearance revoked.”
Williamson’s group, OPSEC – which represents retired spies, intelligence assets, and special forces – wrote to former Secretary of State John Kerry twice about cutting off the Clintons from their hard-won secrets… but Kerry did absolutely nothing.
Now, it looks like President Donald Trump has put the fear of God into Hillary.
The new president stripped former CIA director – and Communist – John Brennan of his security clearance – and that must have convinced Clinton that she was in hot water. She decided to voluntarily remove her own clearance before the investigation went further.
But investigators are already combing through reams of documents to see if she broke the law… and the evidence is literally stacking up!
The State Department said it is going over “tens of thousands” of documents released by the FBI as part of “its ongoing review of the mishandling of classified information related to the use of Clinton’s non-government email server.”
Now, put two-and-two together.
Hillary set up a private email server to keep her dirty laundry out of public records. She stonewalled the investigation, smashed computers with hammers, and hid tens of thousands of emails.
She saw the Trump administration closing in – ready to recommend she lose her clearance… and possibly be prosecuted.
So, she “demanded” the State Department cut off her access to classified material.
Sorry, Hillary, that won’t stop the president from scrutinizing every single email and holding you accountable… and Trump is not even stopping with Hillary.
Trump has his administration looking at revoking the security clearances of Obama administration officials – including former President Barack Obama’s FBI directors James Comey and Andrew McCabe, Obama’s NSA adviser Susan Rice, and Obama’s other CIA director, Michael Hayden.
Lock them up!
Frank Holmes is a reporter for The Horn News. He is a veteran journalist and an outspoken conservative that talks about the news that was in his weekly article, “On The Holmes Front.”
Benghazi survivor to anyone mad at Trump over Saudi journo death: 30 Americans left to die in Libya. Where the hell were you?
Frieda Powers
Lock them up!
Frank Holmes is a reporter for The Horn News. He is a veteran journalist and an outspoken conservative that talks about the news that was in his weekly article, “On The Holmes Front.”
Benghazi survivor to anyone mad at Trump over Saudi journo death: 30 Americans left to die in Libya. Where the hell were you?
Frieda Powers
As the left attacks President Donald Trump over his response to the death of Saudi Arabian journalist Jamal Khashoggi, a Benghazi survivor delivered a brutal reality check to critics.
Kris Paronto, the former U.S. Army Ranger who survived the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, slammed the “leftist journalists & liberalists” who have been angrily spouting off at Trump’s handling of Khashoggi’s death at Turkey’s Saudi Arabian Embassy.
Image: screenshot
“Where in the hell were you” Paronto asked, condemning the hypocrisy over the media’s downplaying of the controversial decisions made by the Obama administration that cost the lives of Americans in Benghazi, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stephens.
Kris Paronto@KrisParonto
Leftist journalists & liberalists screaming that the President isn’t doing enough to the Saudi’s because one of their own was killed.Where in the hell were you when @BarackObama left 30+ AMERICANS to die in Benghazi Libya including an Ambassador?!!You all are a disgrace .
Leftist journalists & liberalists screaming that the President isn’t doing enough to the Saudi’s because one of their own was killed.Where in the hell were you when @BarackObama left 30+ AMERICANS to die in Benghazi Libya including an Ambassador?!!You all are a disgrace .
Saudi Arabian officials claimed Friday that Khashoggi died after an alleged fist fight inside the embassy, prompting cries that the government of the Middle Eastern country was lying and calling on Trump to retaliate.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson appeared to echo Paronto’s general sentiments, asking on “Tucker Carson Tonight” Friday why the left has been silent over the regime’s previous murderous acts.
“The usual head-nodders on TV seem stunned by the news. They can hardly believe that a bloodthirsty, medieval theocracy would do this. Really? The Saudis? The same people that cut off the hands of thieves and behead adulterers in public parks?” Carlson asked sarcastically.
He went on to slam the “wave of false-posturing on display by our own mindless ruling class.”
Paronto’s scathing rebuke on Twitter was applauded while it sparked fresh condemnation over former President Barack Obama’s mishandling of the Benghazi attack.
Cuomo ends brutal lecture on Trump joking about violence with own tone-deaf threat on Lewandowski’s life
Cuomo ends brutal lecture on Trump joking about violence with own tone-deaf threat on Lewandowski’s life
Frieda Powers
Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski locked horns with CNN’s Chris Cuomo over the president’s remarks on a GOP congressman who body-slammed a reporter.
After spending an entire segment trying to prove that joking about violence is never okay, ( if your name is Trump or you are a Republican), Cuomo cluelessly tells his guest in the end, if he ever attempted to kick him, it would be the last thing he ever did on this earth.
On “Cuomo Prime Time” Friday, Cuomo repeatedly tried and failed to get Lewandowski to single out President Donald Trump as being wrong for praising Rep. Greg Gianforte, as he insisted “nobody on the left” would encourage such violent things.
“Why lionize him in front of the crowd, why say he’s your guy?” Cuomo asked about Trump’s comments following Thursday’s incident at a Montana rally.
“Any guy that can do a body slam, he is my type!” Trump said to a cheering crowd Thursday, referring to the Republican congressman’s body-slam of a reporter last year while campaigning. Gianforte, who went on to win the special election and is now up for re-election, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to community service for his actions, according to ABC News.
“Nobody on the left has said anything like that? Why would the president?” Cuomo asked Lewandowski on Friday.
“Well, Chris, I think the rhetoric as it comes to this is just, again it’s way too high,” Lewandowski responded.
“His is way too high. Call his out, Corey,” Cuomo urged, as Lewandowski replied that “it’s going to be on both sides.”
“But I want to hear you say that what Trump said was wrong!” Cuomo insisted, refusing to move on or even accept anything the former Trump campaign manager said.
“What I’m saying is both sides are wrong,” he countered as he repeatedly condemned anyone “condoning this type of violence.”
Lewandowski, who faced his own controversy during the 2016 campaign when a reporter for Breitbart News accused him of forcefully grabbing her at a press event, would not give in to Cuomo’s relentless pressure for a sound bite.
The CNN host had thrown down a challenge to Gianforte earlier, as he likened the crowd’s cheering of Trump’s praise to ancient Romans who roared “when lions mauled someone in the arena.”
“Why does Trump praise bullies? Time and again, he celebrates punks who go after the little guy,” Cuomo told his viewers Friday. “Does it on the world stage with bad guys whom you’re clearly impressed by. And do you it on the rally stage and make no mistake, he wasn’t just getting carried away in the moment.”
Cuomo Prime Time ✔@CuomoPrimeTime
"Why does Trump praise bullies? Time and again he celebrates punks."
In his #ClosingArgument, @ChrisCuomo defines what it means to be a leader, and he uses a certain #NBA superstar as his example.https://cnn.it/2yO7bml
"Why does Trump praise bullies? Time and again he celebrates punks."
In his #ClosingArgument, @ChrisCuomo defines what it means to be a leader, and he uses a certain #NBA superstar as his example.https://cnn.it/2yO7bml
“Everything Gianforte did is weak, okay? He attacked someone who wasn’t a threat, was at every disadvantage, Gianforte showed no control, no confidence, no respect for his office or his constituents or for the law. He is weak,” Cuomo said. “And if he doesn’t like it, he can come body slam me as well. I welcome it.”
He continued his line of reasoning as he pressed Lewandoski later to just admit Trump was wrong. ( It’s unclear why Cuomo could not mentally process the “both sides are wrong” statement).
“Look, it wasn’t the president who body-slammed anyone,” Lewandowski argued after an extended back-and-forth with Cuomo.
“I know! but he’s the one celebrating it,” the exasperated CNN host countered, suggesting Lewandowski was like someone “hypnotized” into not being allowed to say the words.
Lewandowski, meanwhile, defended Trump’s support of the Republican congressman in Montana while he persistently maintained that “we can’t allow” the physical violence.
“There has to be a new decorum,” he said.
“So then say the president shouldn’t have said it! That’s how you get the new decorum!” Cuomo insisted, refusing to accept anything but Lewandowski’s finger pointing at Trump.
The segment went on for many minutes with the two wrestling in a battle of words that finally ended with an amazing show of hypocrisy from Cuomo.
“If you go down and I kick you in the head and then I put out a tweet saying, ‘Whoops I was just kidding,’ that doesn’t clarify anything,” Lewandowski said, referring to comments by former Attorney General Eric Holder who urged his supporters to “kick” Republicans.
In a complete lack of self-awareness, Cuomo shot back with a typical liberal double standard, touting actions by himself that he condemned in others.
“Corey, the moment that your foot touched my head, it would be the last thing you ever did on this earth, so there’d be no tweeting after,” he said as the two finally agreed to disagree.
A death threat? Nice way to wrap up a painfully tone-deaf lecture on the dangers of rhetoric condoning violence.
Donald Trump Suggests Someone Is Paying Migrants in Caravan
Donald Trump Suggests Someone Is Paying Migrants in Caravan
ORLANDO ESTRADA/AFP/GETTY IMAGE
President Donald Trump suggested Thursday that someone was paying migrants in the caravan traveling to the United States from Honduras.
“We’re starting to find out, and I won’t say 100 percent, I’ll put a little tiny question mark at the end … but a lot of money has been passing through people to come up and try to get to the border by election day,” Trump said during a campaign rally in Montana.
The group of over 4,000 migrants is currently traveling through Guatemala, although the president did not cite evidence on Thursday to back his claim that some of them could be paid.
The president said the caravan would be stopped before they reached the border, mocking Democrats for trying to influence the immigration issue.
“They wanted that caravan, and there are those who say that caravan didn’t just happen,” Trump said.
He told supporters the Mexican government would “hopefully” stop the caravan before it reached their own Southern border.
If Mexico failed, he reassured the crowd, he would send the military to the Southern border.
He ripped Democrats for favoring illegal immigration, accusing them of wanting to import more voters into the United States.
“Hey, they’re not so stupid when you think about it,” he said. “But they are crazy.”
Trump repeated that he needed more Republicans in Congress to help him change the immigration laws, calling them the “worst in the world” for allowing migrants to claim asylum and get released into the country.
He admitted that the flood of migrants coming into the country was “his fault.”
“I caused it because I have created such an incredible economy and I have created so many jobs, I have made this country so great that everybody wants to come in!”
Arizona Republic Publishes Cartoon Depicting Sinema With Rocket Launcher Shooting Down McSally
BY: Cameron Cawthorne
Rep. Martha McSally / Getty Images
The Arizona Republic news publication received backlash on social media for depicting Rep. Kyrsten Sinema (D., Ariz.) using a rocket launcher to shoot her Senate opponent, Republican Rep. Martha McSally (Ariz.), down in a plane.
Sinema, who is a former anti-war activist, is shown holding a rocket launcher with the word "substance"on it and giving a thumbs up. On the right side of the cartoon, there is a plane going down with the words "shallow attacks" written in the black smoke. The plane has "McSally" written on it, referring to Sinema's opponent, who was the first woman in U.S. history to fly a fighter jet in combat and the first to command a fighter squadron. The words "reason not treason" are at the bottom of the cartoon.
"Arizona Republic editorial cartoonist Steve Benson on the McSally vs. Sinema #AZSEN race," tweeted Arizona Republic's national politics editor Dan Nowicki along with an image of the cartoon.
Elizabeth Warren: 'I am not a citizen of any tribal nation'
by Pete Kasperowicz
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., made it clear Friday night that she does not belong to any Native American tribe, after she took a DNA test that she said demonstrates that she likely has a distant Native American ancestor.
"I am not a citizen of any tribal nation," she said in a debate with her Republican Senate rival, Geoff Diehl. "Only tribes determine tribal citizenship, it's not done by DNA."
Warren has taken heat from both Republicans and Democrats for taking a DNA test that showed she may only be 1/1024th Native American, and then saying that test showed she's right to claim that heritage. Democrats grumbled that her announcement was a distraction, and even Native Americans argued that she was undermining them by staking a claim to their heritage.
But Warren said in the debate that she never claimed that heritage in order to advance her career.
"The Boston Globe has done an extensive analysis and come up with the fact that nothing in my background ever made any difference in my hiring," she said.
Warren also accused Diehl of running President Trump's playbook by raising her DNA test.
"Mr. Diehl knows this, and the reason he raises it is because he's just trying to do Donald Trump's bidding here," she said.
Warren said voters should trust her because she has released all of her tax and personal information, and even took that DNA test. "I am an open book," she said.
Diehl argued in the debate that Warren is spending time all around the country, implying that she's more interested in setting herself up for a White House run in 2020, instead of focusing on people in Massachusetts. But Diehl is behind by double digits in the heavily Democratic state.
Triple Amputee Vet Brian Kolfage Vows to Haul Facebook CEO Into Court for Censorship of Conservative Websites — All the Way Up to the Supreme Court if Necessary
Air Force veteran Brian Kolfage is vowing to fight Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg — all the way up to Supreme Court if necessary — if the social media giant does not reinstate his Facebook pages, which Facebook deleted without warning or explanation.
“I’m going to take the fight to Facebook. No one has ever done it. You can tell the rage I have over this whole thing,” Kolfage said in an interview with Breitbart News Daily Sirius XM host and Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow on Friday.
“We are not going to stop until Facebook is held accountable on this for everybody. This is not about me. This is about free speech and this is about what they are doing to Americans,” he said.
Kolfage, who lost three limbs fighting in the Iraq War in 2004, was the administrator of the widely-read conservative Right Wing News page on Facebook, which had more than three million followers. He also founded a coffee company, Military Grade Coffee, which had more than 200,000 customers and is how he makes a living for his family.
But earlier this month, Facebook deleted both pages, without warning and without explanation. When Facebook rolled out new rules nine months ago, Kolfage contacted Facebook to make sure his pages were in compliance.
After months of emailing, he finally had a scheduled appointment with a Facebook executive on October 3, 2018. However, after he raised more than $600,000 in support of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Facebook canceled the meeting and deleted both of his pages. To add insult to injury, Kolfage had over the years dropped more than $300,000 in advertising on his pages.
Kolfage said before Kavanaugh, there was never any problem with his page.
“I’m being punished for my beliefs — I truly believe it,” Kolfage. “It’s truly about who we are and our beliefs…right before the elections — it couldn’t be more blatant what’s going on.”
“We need to come together and Zuckerberg needs to get hauled into court,” he said. “We’re going to take him all the way to Supreme Court if we have to. We’re going to fight for the American people and we’re going to fight for everyone who’s been screwed over by them.”
Although Kolfage is a veteran and a triple amputee, he said his fight is about his freedom of speech and conservative censorship.
“This isn’t about me. This is about free speech,” he said. “Everyone should be rallying around this. Everyone should be pissed off about this. Regardless of my politics, they came after my primary source of income because of my politics, and that’s what’s wrong. And that’s why everyone should be rallying around me.”
However, the irony that he fought and sacrificed for American rights and values such as freedom of speech and is now being denied those same rights does not escape him.
“I can’t let my sacrifice just fall by the wayside. I can’t let it fall by the wayside for my family, the people I love, the country I love. I’ve given way too much, way too much,” he said.
As a triple amputee, he says life is just getting harder and harder. He said as his young children grow up, he is discovering there is more that he cannot do with them, such as playing soccer.
“They just started playing soccer. I can’t kick the damn soccer ball with them and help them learn how to play soccer,” he said. And now, he said, Facebook is kicking him down.
“I”m seeing that I can’t do stuff with my kids…and then Facebook over here and these tech companies are just kicking me,” he said.
He also notes that his friends in the liberal and mainstream media outlets are refusing to cover his plight or not answering his emails.
“It shows where the line in the sand is drawn. I know who’s contacted me and who hasn’t contacted me,” he said. “I have friends at CNN — I contacted them. They won’t even email me back over it. And it’s bullcrap.”
Kolfage has started a page at www.fight4freespeech.com. “I really need people to go to this website and sign up and support me,” he said.
“I’m not going to stop. I’m going to see this one through and kick a field goal, and you’re going to see Zuckerberg’s little skinny butt in court.”
Nikki Haley Eviscerates Elizabeth Warren
TTN Staff
Nikki Haley Eviscerates Elizabeth Warren
TTN Staff
.
Nikki Haley headlined a charity dinner in New York on Thursday evening and used it as an opportunity to take a shot at Senator Elizabeth Warren. The line came after Haley was introduced as the next President of the United States by comedian Jim Gaffigan.
According to Fox News:
Haley, who was once the Republican governor of South Carolina, brought the funny while at the annual Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, named after the former New York governor. who was the first Catholic to receive a major party nomination for president when he ran in 1928.
Nikki Haley headlined a charity dinner in New York on Thursday evening and used it as an opportunity to take a shot at Senator Elizabeth Warren. The line came after Haley was introduced as the next President of the United States by comedian Jim Gaffigan.
According to Fox News:
Haley, who was once the Republican governor of South Carolina, brought the funny while at the annual Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, named after the former New York governor. who was the first Catholic to receive a major party nomination for president when he ran in 1928.
The very act of being out to dinner provided some material for the ambassador as she tried her hand at stand up comedy. "So I really am super excited to be at the Al Smith Dinner," Haley remarked. "As a member of the Trump cabinet it is a thrill to be out to dinner without being harassed."
When the timing is right, and election calendars align, the roast can be the last time presidential nominees take the stage together ahead of Election Day. In 2016, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton swapped pointed barbs at the event, which raises money for poor children.
"So this year you wanted to spice things up again, right? I get it," Haley deadpanned. "You wanted an Indian woman, but Elizabeth Warren failed her DNA test,"
Haley also said that Trump gave her some advice before the speech. If she got stuck for laughs she should just brag about his accomplishments.
Keith Ellison’s divorce records unsealed by court
by Ben Marquis
When the timing is right, and election calendars align, the roast can be the last time presidential nominees take the stage together ahead of Election Day. In 2016, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton swapped pointed barbs at the event, which raises money for poor children.
"So this year you wanted to spice things up again, right? I get it," Haley deadpanned. "You wanted an Indian woman, but Elizabeth Warren failed her DNA test,"
Haley also said that Trump gave her some advice before the speech. If she got stuck for laughs she should just brag about his accomplishments.
Keith Ellison’s divorce records unsealed by court
by Ben Marquis
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), who serves as deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee and is running for attorney general in his state, has been fending off allegations of domestic abuse from ex-girlfriend Karen Monahan, who has claimed that Ellison was emotionally, physically and verbally abusive toward her in 2016.
In light of those allegations, two media outlets — the Minneapolis Star Tribune and Alpha News — requested that records of Ellison’s 2012 divorce from his ex-wife Kim Ellison be unsealed. An appeals court judge agreed with the outlets and the divorce records were unsealed on Wednesday.
The Ellisons, who were married for 25 years, had unsuccessfully argued against the public release of the divorce records out of concern for their privacy and to protect sensitive and personal information. The media outlets had simply argued that, due to the allegations and fact that Ellison was running to be the top law enforcement official in the state, the divorce records were a matter of public interest.
Abusive behavior
It had been thought that the divorce records might show that Ellison had a history of being abusive toward his ex-wife — instead, the Washington Examiner reported that the records actually show Ellison’s ex-wife was abusive toward him.
In a 2015 filing, Ellison alleged that his ex-wife Kim had “hit me too many times to mention” during their marriage and claimed that on one occasion she had even bit him on the arm and threatened to stab him.
The statements came after his ex-wife had filed a claim seeking additional spousal support and a claim that he had failed to provide her with health insurance, as had previously been agreed upon.
“The Respondent constantly blamed her physical abuse of me on her depression and MS, but would always do it again. Finally, I had to leave the marriage,” wrote Ellison. “I never hit or assaulted the Respondent, although I am physically larger, quicker, and stronger than she is.”
United front
Unsurprisingly, both Keith and Kim Ellison were greatly displeased that the court had ruled against them and in favor of the media outlets seeking the release of their divorce records. Both surmised it was cynically done to influence the upcoming election, as per a report from The Washington Post.
At a news conference on Tuesday following the judge’s ruling — but prior to the unsealing of the documents — Kim Ellison stated, “There was never any abuse in our marriage and there’s nothing in our files to say that there was.” She added, “I’m ashamed that a judge thinks it’s okay to exploit somebody’s mental illness. And it’s unconscionable to me that Alpha News and the Star Tribune want to use it to influence the results of an election.”
Keith Ellison echoed her sentiments in a statement Wednesday, “I am extremely disappointed that the court has gone back on its agreement to seal (Kim’s) and my divorce file, agreeing to open it at the request of a far-right propaganda outlet with a history of racism and religious bigotry, Alpha News, and the Star Tribune.”
“I understand perhaps better than most that as a public official, my personal life falls under higher scrutiny than others. But to pry into the details of a sealed divorce file that the court previously ordered closed, on the eve of an election, is shameful and outrageous,” he added.
Problematic response
Monahan’s allegations of abuse against Ellison came at an inconvenient time for Democrats, as they attempted to hinder the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh with various last-minute sexual misconduct allegations.
As Democrats and progressives chanted “I believe Dr. Ford” in support of Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford’s unverifiable allegation, some couldn’t help but notice that Monahan wasn’t getting much attention. She has complained as much herself, writing on Twitter, “I’ve been smeared, threatened, isolated from my own party.”
Whether this additional background information helps or hurts Ellison’s image remains to be seen, but one can bet that this isn’t the last we’ll hear about it.
VIDEO: Elizabeth Warren Struggles to Defend Her Heritage
In the recent Massachusetts Senate debate, Elizabeth Warren had a difficult time defending the traces of Native American ancestry that were revealed in her DNA test.
She received immense criticism from Native leaders this week which is why she wanted to make it clear she is “not a citizen of any tribal nation,” despite listing her ethnicity as Native American in employment forms for elite universities:
Our weekend laugher:
G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2018/10/www_20.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment