Title :
link :
Coming Soon!!!
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.
BLOGSPOT.COM
Tues. New Years Day, . Jan. 1, 2019
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Happy New Year!!!
President Fauxcahontas? Elizabeth Warren Announces She’s Running for President
By Alex Pappas | Fox News
By Alex Pappas | Fox News
Elizabeth Warren wants the government to manufacture its own generic drugs, but what would happen during a shutdown?
The potential 2020 presidential candidate's plan is examined by a doctor on 'Fox & Friends.'
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren said Monday she is filing paperwork to launch an exploratory committee for president, taking her first major step toward a 2020 run for the White House.
“Today, I’m launching an exploratory committee for president,” Warren, 69, a Democrat, said in a video released to supporters.
In her announcement, Warren argued government "has been bought and paid for by a bunch of billionaires and giant corporations that think they get to dictate the rules that affect everyone," calling it "corruption, pure and simple."
"That’s not how government is supposed to work," Warren said. "You know it. I know it. And we know it is time to fight back."
As for details about her campaign, Warren said she'll "announce a plan" early in the new year.
Warren burst onto the national scene a decade ago during the financial crisis with calls for greater consumer protections. She quickly became one of the party's more prominent liberals even as she sometimes fought with Obama administration officials over their response to the market turmoil.
Now, as a likely presidential contender, she is making an appeal to the party's base. Her video notes the economic challenges facing people of color along with images of a women's march and Warren's participation at an LGBT event.
Every person in America should be able to work hard, play by the same set of rules, & take care of themselves & the people they love. That’s what I’m fighting for, & that’s why I’m launching an exploratory committee for president. I need you with me: http://elizabethwarren.com
Warren is the most prominent Democrat yet to make a move toward a presidential bid and has long been a favorite target of President Trump.
In October, Warren took the rare step of releasing DNA test results examining her possible Native American ancestry, in apparent response to persistent criticism from President Trump and other Republicans.
Warren for years has been accused of exaggerating her Native American heritage to help get a job as a Harvard law professor. The president, highlighting the controversy that has dogged her since her first campaign for the Senate, routinely uses the nickname “Pocahontas” for her.
The results released by Warren revealed “strong evidence” that Warren had a Native American ancestor dating back six to 10 generations. But the test may have caused new issues with the Native American community.
The Cherokee Nation responded to the results at the time by arguing that “a DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship.”
"Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person’s ancestors were indigenous to North or South America," Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin Jr. said in a press release.
In mid-December, former Obama housing chief Julian Castro also announced a presidential exploratory committee, which legally allows potential candidates to begin raising money. Outgoing Maryland Rep. John Delaney is the only Democrat so far to have formally announced a presidential campaign.
But that's likely to change quickly in the new year as other leading Democrats take steps toward White House runs.
Warren enters a Democratic field that's shaping up as the most crowded in decades, with many of her Senate colleagues openly weighing their own campaigns, as well as governors, mayors and other prominent citizens. One of her most significant competitors could be Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who is eyeing another presidential run harnessing the same populist rhetoric.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
GOP Rep. Brooks Explains Why Democrats Want Open Borders
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) suggested on Sunday that the Democrats do not want to secure the southern border because they want to change the voting electorate in the U.S. through immigration.
"It is a very tough position that the Democrats have put us in," Brooks began. "On the one hand you have got thousands of Americans who are dead each year because of the Democrats’ refusal to secure the border.
Those Americans are dying either because they have been murdered by illegal aliens, vehicular homicides by illegal aliens or the illegal narcotics that are shipped into the country by illegal aliens and their drug cartels with the drug overdoses that are in the tens of thousands of lost American lives per year."
"So the question is going to be how much blood, American blood, you have to have on the hands of the Democrats leaders like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer before they will help us with border security?" Brooks continued. "Or is their craving for power such that they are willing to accept the loss of American lives?"
When asked if the Democrats might be willing to compromise with President Donald Trump on border security, Brooks answered, "I don't know if the Democrats are willing to do it now; they were not willing to do it earlier this year."
"On our side — those of us who care about border security, and care about the financial health, and actual health of American citizens — we've already compromised a lot on this issue," Brooks continued. "$25 billion is what we need to properly secure our border with a wall and we're all the way down to $5 billion — that is a huge compromise where you are giving up 80% of what is needed to adequately protect the lives and safety of American citizens."
Brooks then explained why he believes the Democrats refuse to secure the southern border, suggesting that the Democrats are essentially trying to import voters.
"Democrats have an open borders philosophy, they don’t believe in border security, they believe this is the way to change the American electorate in order to win elections," Brooks explained.
Brooks also noted that studies have shown that illegal aliens cost U.S. taxpayers over $100 billion per year.
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) says Pelosi & Schumer have "blood on their hands" for refusing to secure the border: “Democrats have an open borders philosophy, they don’t believe in border security, they believe this is the way to change the American electorate in order to win elections.”
President Trump Nukes Democrat Deception: If Walls Don’t Work, Why Does Obama Have a Wall Around His Mansion?
President Trump pointed to the wall former President Obama built around his Washington D.C., home as a reason Congress should fund his barrier on the southern border.
President and Mrs. Obama built/has a ten foot Wall around their D.C. mansion/compound. I agree, totally necessary for their safety and security. The U.S. needs the same thing, slightly larger version!
“President and Mrs. Obama built/has a ten foot Wall around their D.C. mansion/compound. I agree, totally necessary for their safety and security. The U.S. needs the same thing, slightly larger version!,” Trump tweeted on Sunday afternoon.
The former president and his wife, Michelle, bought the 8,200-square-foot mansion for $8.1 million in 2017, according to reports.
The house is in the Kalorama section of Washington, an exclusive enclave for diplomats, lobbyists and politicians, including Trump’s daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared, as well as Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos.
The Obamas bought the house after leasing it when Obama left office in 2016.
They made a number of renovations to the property at the time, including the wall.
Trump has been battling with congressional Democrats over funding for his wall on the southern border.
The former president and his wife, Michelle, bought the 8,200-square-foot mansion for $8.1 million in 2017, according to reports.
The house is in the Kalorama section of Washington, an exclusive enclave for diplomats, lobbyists and politicians, including Trump’s daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared, as well as Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos.
The Obamas bought the house after leasing it when Obama left office in 2016.
They made a number of renovations to the property at the time, including the wall.
Trump has been battling with congressional Democrats over funding for his wall on the southern border.
The president wants $5 billion for the barrier, but Democrats are offering only $1.6 billion for border security — and nothing for a wall.
The stalemate led to a partial government shutdown.
The NFL Just Got Some Scary News About Its Ratings
The NFL can’t catch a break.The league that seemed to have an invincible brand is cracking amid
Pressure.
Now the league just got some more troubling news about its ratings.
Now the league just got some more troubling news about its ratings.
Out of all the major American sports, no professional league has had as
much turmoil as the NFL.
The anti-American anthem protests started by Colin Kaepernick caused an ugly rift.
Some fans walked away because they sided with Kaepernick’s stance, and others turned away in disgust at the lack of respect for the American flag.
Unfortunately for the NFL, the result was the same; fans were walking away.
The anthem protest isn’t the only issue giving league commissioner Roger Goodell sleepless nights.
The brain injury scare dramatized in the film “Concussion” dissuaded many from not only watching the game, but allowing their children to play youth league football.
Former NFL offensive lineman and football commentator Ed Cunningham left the broadcast booth over his dismay with the concussion issue.
Older football viewers like Cunningham are walking away.
Older football viewers like Cunningham are walking away.
The NFL is also losing younger fans, which is a never a good sign for any business.
Some fans are abandoning the league because of its handling of off-the-field violence, particularly violence against women.
Former running back Ray Rice caused a stir when he received a slap on the wrist after beating his then-fiancée on a public elevator.
However, when video of the barbaric incident leaked, the Baltimore Ravens had no choice but to cut Rice loose.
Something similar recently happened with star running back Kareem Hunt, whom the Kansas City Chiefs released after he was captured on camera pushing and kicking a woman in a hotel hallway.
Other fans are changing the channel because of their disgust over terrible rule changes that result in game-stultifying penalties.
Coincidentally, the Raiders’ possible final game in Oakland (against the rival Denver Broncos, no less) didn’t drum up any interest.
According to Sports Business Journal, the Monday Night Football game between Oakland and Denver received a paltry 5.4 rating.
That’s the lowest rating since a 2016 matchup between the Atlanta Falcons and New Orleans Saints only drew a 5.7.
However, that game has a reasonable excuse for the low viewership.
The game was programmed against the Donald Trump/Hillary Clinton debate, which was the most-watched presidential debate in history.
The Raiders/Broncos game had no such monumental television event airing at the same time.
That’s a bad sign for the NFL, which seems to be gradually contracting instead of expanding.
Yet the NFL is flirting with expansion teams in Mexico City and London while the game’s popularity is under siege.
Such a rash move could accelerate the decline of the league.
The NFL needs to put out fires before it even thinks about expanding to new territories.
The NFL hasn’t resolved any of these problems, and it’s being reflected in the ratings.
Socialist Princess Ocasio-Cortez Suffers Twitter Meltdown After She Is Called Out on Her Elite Upbringing
Socialist Princess Ocasio-Cortez Suffers Twitter Meltdown After She Is Called Out on Her Elite Upbringing
by Jim Hoft 
Ocasio-CortezCongresswoman elect Democrat-Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted out a photo of her congressional office this weekend. She made the mistake of adding that she’s just your average girl from the Bronx.
Oops.
Conservative Michael Knowles jumped on her tweet reminding the young socialist that she actually grew up in the elite neighborhood of Worchester, miles from the Bronx.
This set off the socialist princess!
Ocasio-Cortez doubled-down on her fudged bio.
Michael Knowles hit her again and called her out for her repeated lies.
As The Gateway Pundit reported back in July 2018 — Ocasio-Cortez was forced to change her campaign bio page after she was caught lying about living in two worlds when she grew up in Worchester. She left the Bronx when she was five-years-old.
And Knowles hit her again.
And that resulted in Ocasio-Cortez lashing out at Knowles for “mansplaining” — all because she was caught in a lie!
Ocasio-Cortez didn’t take being corrected very well.
Nancy Pelosi announces ‘climate crisis’ committee — after flying to Hawaii
by Sarah May
Image Source: ScreenshotThere’s no doubt that climate change is one of the fundamental pillars of the left’s platform — and as such, it’s no surprise that when the Democrats assume the majority in the House next week, the issue will receive renewed focus in that chamber.
On Friday, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced the planned creation of a so-called Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, though the move was seen by many as egregiously ill-timed, given that she had just jetted thousands of miles across the ocean for a luxury Hawaiian getaway.
Castor tapped to head Select Committee
Pelosi also announced on Friday the appointment of Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL) to head the special committee, heralding her ability to bring energy and a sense of urgency to combating the “existential threat of the climate crisis” confronting the nation and the world.
A seven-term congresswoman and current member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Castor issued a statement in which she accepted the appointment and pledged to take strong action aimed at reducing carbon pollution and fostering the creation of green jobs.
According to Castor, the imminent threats posed by “changing climate and extreme weather events” are very real and “failure is not an option.”
Progressives quick to voice dissatisfaction
However, not all Democrats happily endorsed Pelosi’s announcement, with members of the more progressive wing of the party taking issue with its composition and limited powers.
Outspoken Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) promptly entered the fray. Her spokesman, Corbin Trent, even declared the panel “about as useful as a screen door on a submarine.”
Chief among progressives’ complaints about the committee is the fact that it will not have subpoena power or the ability to pass bills to the House floor for a vote.
Further, Ocasio-Cortez and others are frustrated that Castor declined to force committee members to refuse political contributions from members of the fossil fuel industry.
Ocasio-Cortez and others on the far left instead support the so-called “Green New Deal” plan that calls for things such as 100 percent use of renewable electricity in the United States, federal jobs initiatives, and universal health care.
Climate hypocrisy abounds on the left
Pelosi’s climate change announcement was striking in its tone-deafness, given that she herself had just traversed a wide swath of the hemisphere by plane to reach the Fairmont Orchid Resort in Kona, Hawaii.
Of course, the “do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do” nature of countless climate change activists on the left is nothing new.
It was recently revealed that progressive hero and climate change firebrand Bernie Sanders spent approximately $300,000 on private flights this past October alone.
However, fossil fuel use on that level pales in comparison to that of self-anointed global warming guru Al Gore, whose Tennessee mansion reportedly uses more electricity in a single year than a typical American family does in the span of 21 years.
But that’s just another example of the left’s hypocrisy on climate change.
Until they start practicing what they preach, it’s unlikely that the Dems will see any support from the right side of the aisle.
Mr. Chief Justice: What are you doing about the fraud on the FISA Court you supervise?
By Ed Timperlake
Mr. Chief Justice: What are you doing about the fraud on the FISA Court you supervise?
By Ed Timperlake
A Politico article by an experienced attorney, Nelson Cunningham, raises an interesting legal question:
We're about to find out why the chief justice of the Supreme Court decided to get involved in the special counsel's investigation[.] ... So now, in abrupt fashion, Mueller's investigation has suddenly reached the Supreme Court, and with the personal attention of the chief justice, no less.
Official portrait. Chief Justice Roberts
Nelson Cunningham had served on the White House staff and has by now probably seen everything the DOJ, the White House, and Congress can do to each other, especially in the hothouse atmosphere of impeachment proceedings. I served on the professional staff of the House Committee on Rules and as the staff action officer for the impeachment inquiry of President Clinton. I knew Cunningham's office of General Counsel well.
Invoking a connection between Chief Justice Roberts and Special Counsel Mueller is interesting, and that mystery will soon be solved. Beyond that big reveal being speculated about in the Politico article, Chief Justice Roberts is already directly connected to the Mueller Probe. Roberts is 100% responsible for all issues of any legal malfeasance engaged in by the FISA court.
[T]he FISC judges are unique in American history and are the wholly owned responsibility of Chief Justice John Roberts, who alone appoints them. To take the great Harry Truman quote when president: "the buck stops here," the sacred social contract of his stewardship in owning the FISC-appointed judges means that the buck stops with the chief justice.
It has now been made publicly transparent that Special Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ lawyer Lisa Page had plotted to connect and engage with a sitting FISA Court judge, Rudy Contreras. This illegal activity – essentially judge-tampering – is shameful all around, since the American people have given the Foreign Surveillance Court significant power that essentially abrogates important constitutional safeguards for all Americans.
Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions (including renewals) before the FISC are classified. As such, the public's confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court's ability to hold the government to the highest standard – particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens.
Let's look at one possible entanglement of FISA that is most definitely not Russia, Russia, Russia! as it relates to a history of MI6 and the Clintons. Sir Richard Dearlove, now retired head of MI6, was station chief in D.C. when Hillary Clinton was first lady. Now fast-forward to the 2016 campaign. The Brits, with MI6 deeply involved, created the Steele dossier, and all profited handsomely. It was used by the FBI/DOJ in a CI investigation to spy on President Trump, his family, and many others. It is a foundational document for a massive fraud on Justice Roberts's personally supervised FISA Court. Again, from Chairman Nunes's memo, remember that Christopher Steele is MI6 (officially "retired" – as if anyone ever really retires from the spy game).
The "dossier" compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump's ties to Russia.
So let's leave this dynamic and ongoing issue on this New Year's Eve with an issue of FISC "judge-tampering" by asking a simple question for Chief Justice Roberts:
With the media and Mueller focusing on President Trump and Russian collusion, was the fraud on the FISC actually the brainchild of both the Brits and rogue DOJ/FBI individuals? After all, Mr. Chief Justice, they produced the dossier, and Steele was publicly supported by Sir Richard Dearlove.
A Politico article by an experienced attorney, Nelson Cunningham, raises an interesting legal question:
We're about to find out why the chief justice of the Supreme Court decided to get involved in the special counsel's investigation[.] ... So now, in abrupt fashion, Mueller's investigation has suddenly reached the Supreme Court, and with the personal attention of the chief justice, no less.
Nelson Cunningham had served on the White House staff and has by now probably seen everything the DOJ, the White House, and Congress can do to each other, especially in the hothouse atmosphere of impeachment proceedings. I served on the professional staff of the House Committee on Rules and as the staff action officer for the impeachment inquiry of President Clinton. I knew Cunningham's office of General Counsel well.
Invoking a connection between Chief Justice Roberts and Special Counsel Mueller is interesting, and that mystery will soon be solved. Beyond that big reveal being speculated about in the Politico article, Chief Justice Roberts is already directly connected to the Mueller Probe. Roberts is 100% responsible for all issues of any legal malfeasance engaged in by the FISA court.
[T]he FISC judges are unique in American history and are the wholly owned responsibility of Chief Justice John Roberts, who alone appoints them. To take the great Harry Truman quote when president: "the buck stops here," the sacred social contract of his stewardship in owning the FISC-appointed judges means that the buck stops with the chief justice.
It has now been made publicly transparent that Special Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ lawyer Lisa Page had plotted to connect and engage with a sitting FISA Court judge, Rudy Contreras. This illegal activity – essentially judge-tampering – is shameful all around, since the American people have given the Foreign Surveillance Court significant power that essentially abrogates important constitutional safeguards for all Americans.
Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions (including renewals) before the FISC are classified. As such, the public's confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court's ability to hold the government to the highest standard – particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens.
Let's look at one possible entanglement of FISA that is most definitely not Russia, Russia, Russia! as it relates to a history of MI6 and the Clintons. Sir Richard Dearlove, now retired head of MI6, was station chief in D.C. when Hillary Clinton was first lady. Now fast-forward to the 2016 campaign. The Brits, with MI6 deeply involved, created the Steele dossier, and all profited handsomely. It was used by the FBI/DOJ in a CI investigation to spy on President Trump, his family, and many others. It is a foundational document for a massive fraud on Justice Roberts's personally supervised FISA Court. Again, from Chairman Nunes's memo, remember that Christopher Steele is MI6 (officially "retired" – as if anyone ever really retires from the spy game).
The "dossier" compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump's ties to Russia.
So let's leave this dynamic and ongoing issue on this New Year's Eve with an issue of FISC "judge-tampering" by asking a simple question for Chief Justice Roberts:
With the media and Mueller focusing on President Trump and Russian collusion, was the fraud on the FISC actually the brainchild of both the Brits and rogue DOJ/FBI individuals? After all, Mr. Chief Justice, they produced the dossier, and Steele was publicly supported by Sir Richard Dearlove.
d.G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2018/12/coming-soon-www.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment