Title :
link :
It's 2019, I am getting older everyday, and yet I still have so many unanswered questions!!!! I haven’t found out who let the dogs out...where’s the beef...how to get to Sesame Street... why Dora doesn’t just use Google Maps...Why do all flavors of fruit loops taste exactly the same, or how many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop......why eggs are packaged in a flimsy carton, but batteries are secured in plastic that’s tough as nails...what does the fox say... why “abbreviated” is such a long word; or why is there a D in ‘fridge’ but not in refrigerator... why lemon juice is made with artificial flavor yet dish-washing liquid is made with real lemons... why they sterilize the needle for lethal injections... and, why do you have to “put your two cents in” but it’s only a “penny for your thoughts” where’s that extra penny going, why does The Alphabet Song and Twinkle Twinkle Little Star have the same tune... why did you just try to sing those two previous songs? Why don't they spell phonetically, phonetically? Why do we drive on a parkway and park in a driveway? What do you do when you see an endangered specie eating an endangered plant?... and just what exactly is Victoria’s secret? and where is Waldo?... Can you hear me now?...and do you really think I am this witty?? ... I actually got this from a friend, who stole it from her brother’s girlfriend’s uncle’s cousin who lived next door to an old class mate’s mailman...Now it is your turn to take it from me... Copy and Paste, change the age, and enjoy your day.
One more thing...There’s never been a larger collection of prostitutes than the Congress…
In watching Princess Nancy strut around congress yesterday reminds me of the line from Finian’s Rainbow… “Which wich is which”?
WWW.MOEISSUESOF
THEDAY.
BLOGSPOT.COM Fri. Jan. 4, 2019
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Democrats Insert Language to Expand Abortion into Bill to End Shutdown
Chip Somodevill
House Democrats made the expansion of
House Democrats made the expansion of
abortion one of their first orders of business in a bill that
seeks to end the partial government shutdown.
Susan B. Anthony List ✔@SBAListPro-abortion Democrats aren’t wasting any time in trying to force taxpayers to fund abortion >>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/house-democrats-slip-abortion-language-into-spending-bill …
5:17 PM - Jan 2, 2019
The spending bill – to be voted on Thursday – would repeal a provision that bans non-governmental organizations – such as International Planned Parenthood – from providing or promoting abortions as a method of family planning overseas.
Known in the past as the Mexico City Policy, the provision is now known as the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance Policy, and was instituted by President Donald Trump shortly after his inauguration in January 2017. Abortion rights advocates simply refer to the provision as the “global gag rule.”
As the Washington Examiner reports, the bill would also raise funding for the United Nations Population Fund (UNPF) by $5 million to $37.5 million. Human rights activists have long been critical of UNPF – an agency they have linked to the support of population control programs such as China’s coercive abortion “one-child policy.”
The pro-life Students for Life of America (SFLA) is calling on all lawmakers of both parties to reject any new funding for abortion in the budget “that would pay for abortions worldwide and to reject any new funding for abortion here at home.”
“News that abortion is the leading cause of death worldwide is a tragedy of international proportions, but asking U.S. taxpayers to pay for it is an offensive misuse of scarce resources,” said SFLA president Kristan Hawkins. “Taxpayers have had enough of the abortion industry’s vision of abortion as the United States’ number one export.”
Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, said Democrats were “already trying to foist a radical pro-abortion agenda on the nation.”
“A strong majority of Americans oppose taxpayer funding of abortion,” she continued, explaining that a repeal of Trump’s policy would make “taxpayers complicit in the exportation of abortion and destruction of countless unborn children around the world.”
“This is unconscionable and we oppose the bill in the strongest terms,” she said.
The Mexico City Policy was first issued by President Ronald Reagan in 1984 at the United Nations population conference, held in Mexico City. It has been reinstituted by every Republican president via executive order since Ronald Reagan, but rescinded by Democrat presidents.
Delingpole: Twelve Debunked Climate Scares We Can Laugh at in 2019
Delingpole: Twelve Debunked Climate Scares We Can Laugh at in 2019
JASON CONNOLLY/AFP/Getty2019 won’t be the year the climate change scare finally dies, unfortunately. But the people pushing it will look increasingly desperate, sad and piteously short of evidence to support their junk science theories.
Here, courtesy of the Global Warming Policy Forum, are the top twelve climate scares debunked in 2018. Share it with your alarmist friends to wish them a happy, sceptical New Year.
January 2018: Worst-case global warming scenarios not credible: Study
PARIS (AFP) – Earth’s surface will almost certainly not warm up four or five degrees Celsius by 2100, according to a study released Wednesday (Jan 17) which, if correct, voids worst-case UN climate change predictions.
A revised calculation of how greenhouse gases drive up the planet’s temperature reduces the range of possible end-of-century outcomes by more than half, researchers said in the report, published in the journal Nature.
February: ‘Sinking’ Pacific nation Tuvalu is actually getting bigger, new research reveals
The Pacific nation of Tuvalu — long seen as a prime candidate to disappear as climate change forces up sea levels — is actually growing in size, new research shows.
A University of Auckland study examined changes in the geography of Tuvalu’s nine atolls and 101 reef islands between 1971 and 2014, using aerial photographs and satellite imagery.
It found eight of the atolls and almost three-quarters of the islands grew during the study period, lifting Tuvalu’s total land area by 2.9 percent, even though sea levels in the country rose at twice the global average.
March: BBC forced to retract false claim about hurricanes
You may recall the above report by the BBC, which described how bad last year’s Atlantic hurricane season was, before commenting at the end: “A warmer world is bringing us a greater number of hurricanes and a greater risk of a hurricane becoming the most powerful category 5.” I fired off a complaint, which at first they did their best to dodge. After my refusal to accept their reply, they have now been forced to back down
April: Corals can withstand another 100-250 Years of climate change, new study
Heat-tolerant genes may spread through coral populations fast enough to give the marine creatures a tool to survive another 100-250 years of warming in our oceans.
May: Climate change causes beaches to grow by 3,660 square kilometers
Since 1984 humans have gushed forth 64% of our entire emissions from fossil fuels. (Fully 282,000 megatons of deplorable carbon “pollution”.) During this time, satellite images show that 24% of our beaches shrank, while 28% grew. Thus we can say that thanks to the carbon apocalypse there are 3,660 sq kms more global beaches now than there were thirty years ago.
June: Antarctica not losing ice, NASA researcher finds
NASA glaciologist Jay Zwally says his new study will show, once again, the eastern Antarctic ice sheet is gaining enough ice to offset losses in the west.
July: National Geographic admits they were wrong about notorious starving polar bear-climate claims
The narrative behind the viral photo of a polar bear starving, reportedly thanks to climate change, has been called into question by the National Geographic photographer who took it in the first place.
August: New study shows declining risk and increasing resilience to extreme weather in France
This risk factor for French residents of cities stricken by a disaster has been falling with every passing decade.
September: Coral bleaching is a natural event that has gone on for centuries, new study
Coral bleaching has been a regular feature of the Great Barrier Reef for the past 400 years, with evidence of repeated mass events dating back to well before European settlement and the start of the industrial revolution.
October: Climate predictions could be wrong in UK and Europe
Current climate change predictions in the UK and parts of Europe may be inaccurate, a study conducted by researchers from the University of Lincoln, UK, and the University of Liège, Belgium, suggests.
November: Number and intensity of US hurricanes have remained constant since 1900
There’s been “no trend” in the number and intensity of hurricanes hitting the continental U.S. and the normalized damages caused by such storms over the past 117 years, according to a new study.
December: Alarmist sea level rise scenarios unlikely, says climate scientist Judith Curry
A catastrophic rise in sea levels is unlikely this century, with recent experience falling within the range of natural variability over the past several thousand years, according to a report on peer-reviewed studies by US climate scientist Judith Curry.
Henry Olsen: Mitt Romney Put ‘Investors’ Profits’ over ‘American Jobs’
Henry Olsen: Mitt Romney Put ‘Investors’ Profits’ over ‘American Jobs’
AP/Rick BowmerHenry Olsen, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and author of The Working Class Republican: Ronald Reagan and the Return of Blue-Collar Conservatism, said Mitt Romney appeared to prioritize “investors’ profits” over “American jobs,” which contributed to the former Massachusetts governor’s failure to win the presidency in 2012. He offered his remarks in a Thursday interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with hosts Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak.
Romney described President Donald Trump as a man whose character falls short in Tuesday-published Washington Post opinion editorial: “Trump’s character falls short. … With the nation so divided, resentful and angry, presidential leadership in qualities of character is indispensable. And it is in this province where the incumbent’s shortfall has been most glaring.”
Olsen wrote a response to Romney — published in the Washington Post on Wednesday — entitled, “Mitt Romney’s op-ed crystallizes all the reasons the old GOP establishment has been pushed aside.”
Olsen said, “Mitt Romney had a great chance to be President of the United States, and he blew it. He blew it because he didn’t talk about the things that were making people insecure. He wasn’t talking about an economy in a way that made them think that he cared about them. He didn’t talk about immigration in a way that made them think that he was serious about it. He didn’t talk about trade in a way that made them think that he cared more about American jobs than investors’ profits.”
Olsen added, “Romney was shocked. His pollsters told him he was going to win. They were all prepared to win, but the evidence was there all along that the people who gave Trump the presidency rejected Mitt Romney because he did not share their values.”
Olsen continued, “The biggest problem I see in Washington is that most Republican elected officials and most Republican elites still wish that this was the party where the argument was between Romney and Cruz, and it’s not.”
Olsen went on, “It’s not [between Romney and Cruz], because Donald Trump picked up the hundred-dollar bill that had been lying in front of them for about a decade, and cashed it. And that’s the hundred-dollar bill of dissatisfied blue collar workers who want a government that’s limited in its scope but active in the protection of Americans because they are Americans. They think they can put the genie back in the bottle by getting rid of the president. Well, good luck. The fact is, this is what people wanted for years. They’ve had a taste of the apple. They like it, and they’re going to expect the next Republican leader to follow suit, or they’re going to abandon the party.”
Olsen assessed left-wing proposals from self-described “democratic socialists” — including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) — as unappealing to “working class” and “blue collar” Americans.
“The AOC approach is a non-starter with most of the working class,” said Olsen. “They don’t want a big government, heavy, high-tax, high-benefit state. What they want is what they had. They want their jobs back, and they want to stop being subjected to what they consider to be unfair competition. There’s nothing that AOC or her allies would do about that sort of competition [for jobs], particularly from people who come here — whether legally or illegally — and who compete with these people for the jobs.
Trump’s appeal to “working class voters” was key to winning the presidency, appraised Olsen.
“In 2016, I think the way to understand what happened was, there were really three party primaries,” judged Olsen. “There was a Democratic primary between Clinton and Sanders. There was a Republican primary between 17 people, and there was a working class primary between Sanders and Trump, and the working class voters who heard both of those people — and in most states could’ve gone either way because they don’t have party registration — overwhelmingly chose Trump, and a lot of the people who chose Sanders did so knowing that they would vote for Trump if their guy lost. There is no appeal to the AOC-type of policy among the actual working class voters.”
“There’s nothing about the left of the Democratic Party that interests the TIGRs [Trump Is Great Republicans],” concluded Olsen.
Breitbart News Tonight broadcasts live on SiriusXM Patriot channel 125 weeknights from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern or 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pacific.
Follow Robert Kraychik on Twitter.
Hah! President Trump Tweets Out New Elizabeth Warren Campaign Slogan — “Warren 1/2020th”
Hah! President Trump Tweets Out New Elizabeth Warren Campaign Slogan — “Warren 1/2020th”
by Jim Hoft 
Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren announced the formation of her presidential exploratory committee on New Year’s Eve. The came after the disastrous sideshow in November when Warren essentially announced to the world that her Cherokee heritage was a scam.
Warren followed up the announcement with an awkward video of herself drinking a beer in her kitchen.
On Thursday President Trump suggested a campaign slogan for the Warren campaign.
Democrats take control of the House of Representatives today, but you don’t hear journalists instructing them to “show that they can govern” by finding ways to “compromise” with President Trump, as you do when Republicans are poised to gain power. Instead, cable news outlets are eagerly anticipating a year of investigations designed to damage Trump and put Republicans on the defensive in 2020.
On the New Year’s Eve edition of MSNBC’s The Last Word, for example, host Lawrence O’Donnell touted gridlock as a worthy objective: “The Democrats’ number one job in the House of Representatives is to stop every single thing that Donald Trump wants. But the press isn’t going to give them any credit for that because that will be called gridlock.”
That’s never the media’s message when the voters put Republicans in charge of one or both houses of Congress to put the brakes on a Democratic president. Back on November 8, 1994, for example, after voters ended Democrats’ 40 years of control of the House, CNN political analyst Bill Schneider said it was really “a vote for bipartisanship, for centrism.”
A few days later, NBC’s Tim Russert also preached cooperation with Democratic President Bill Clinton, opining on the November 13, 1994 Today show that “if the Republicans govern only from the right and abandon the center, my guess is the public will pay them back in the very near future.”
You heard the same spin after 2010, when Republicans took over the House of Representatives. On the January 1, 2011 CBS Evening News, correspondent Bob Orr argued that Republicans needed to find ways to work with President Barack Obama: “The political reality is the new GOP reformers can’t do anything alone.”
Orr’s story included a soundbite from Politico’s David Mark: “[Republicans] will have an incentive to compromise, to show they can govern, that they’re not just the party of no.”
The media churned out identical advice after Republicans picked up the Senate four years later. “Opposing the President is not a policy,” NBC’s Matt Lauer lectured New Jersey Governor Chris Christie on the November 5, 2014 Today. He demanded: “Tell me, specifically, one area where you would like this new Republican majority to compromise — real compromise — with President Obama.”
This week, news anchors aren’t badgering Democrats to compromise with President Trump. In fact, they’ve been applauding how, “after two years of holding back,” Democrats are finally “fighting” with the President. And even though journalists derided Republican investigations into Obama-era scandals like Benghazi as a “witch hunt,” the media are gleefully anticipating how House Democrats will step up the pressure on Trump.
But that’s also how the media greeted the Democratic takeover of Congress in January 2007, with some journalists agitating for impeachment hearings into the last Republican president’s supposed “crimes.”
Twelve years ago, CNN’s Jack Cafferty wanted action. In his December 11, 2006 commentary on The Situation Room, he asked viewers to weigh in: “Is it wrong for the incoming Congress to simply rule out the impeachment of President Bush?” Then on January 4, 2007, he kept up his complaints: “If the Democratic Party refuses to confront this administration in a meaningful way on the issues that are threatening the very survival of our nation, then they’re no better than the people committing these crimes.”
Keep that in mind as you hear journalists suggest that it’s the once-in-a-lifetime circumstances posed by Donald Trump that will justify Democrats strategy of gridlock, investigations and potential impeachment. These same news organizations were also beating the drums of impeachment for a different Republican president in a very different situation — yet were outraged when Republicans attempted to check the power of Democratic presidents.
BOMBSHELL: For Two Years U.S. Intelligence Kept Secret Evidence in Phony Russia Collusion Case That Completely Undercuts Portrayal of Michael Flynn as a Russian Stooge
According to John Solomon of the Hill
While Sally Yates and the deep state mouthpieces in the msm were going around saying Flynn's dinner in Moscow may have made him a traitor, the CIA was setting on evidence that showed not only was this not the case, but Flynn himself helped the intel agencies by getting briefed and debriefed about the dinner by them.
For nearly two years now, the intelligence community has kept secret evidence in the Russia collusion case that directly undercuts the portrayal of retired Army general and former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn as a Russian stooge.
That silence was maintained even when former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates publicly claimed Flynn was possibly “compromised” by Moscow.
...
Before Flynn made his infamous December 2015 trip to Moscow — as a retired general and then-adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign — he alerted his former employer, the DIA.
He then attended a “defensive” or “protective” briefing before he ever sat alongside Vladimir Putin at the Russia Today (RT) dinner, or before he talked with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
The briefing educated and sensitized Flynn to possible efforts by his Russian host to compromise the former high-ranking defense official and prepared him for conversations in which he could potentially extract intelligence for U.S. agencies such as the DIA.
When Flynn returned from Moscow, he spent time briefing intelligence officials on what he learned during the Moscow contacts. Between two and nine intelligence officials attended the various meetings with Flynn about the RT event, and the information was moderately useful, about what one would expect from a public event, according to my sources.
Terrible as usual if true.
This means that the intel agencies were perfectly fine with the narrative of flynn maybe being a traitor with this dinner, because it helped fit their narrative of attacking Trump, even though they knew it wasn’t the case.
You would think the media people spreading this narrative would now be investigating this story, seeing as how they spread what would be disinformation if true.
But nope, they aren’t interested in being journalists (most of them anyway), they just want to push the Trump russia narrative, and if they report something that is not true, just jump to the next story.
‘Is this for real?’ Lots of ‘firsts’ when two Muslim Congresswomen are sworn in, some flagged ‘concerning’
Vivek Saxena
(Video screenshots)
Newly elected Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib, the first Palestinian-American woman to serve in Congress, doesn’t appear to be concerned about allegations of anti semitism, judging by the way she behaved as the government’s bicameral legislature returned to session Thursday.
First, she announced that she would be sworn in with a Koran while adorned in a Palestinian gown:
“It’s important to me because a lot of Americans have this kind of feeling that Islam is somehow foreign to American history,” Tlaib said about her swearing-in. “Muslims were there at the beginning … Some of our Founding Fathers knew more about Islam than some members of Congress now.”
Then someone reportedly stuck a Post-It note labeled with the word “Palestine” onto the world map in her office, according to Buzzfeed’s Hannah Allam. The note appeared to cover up almost all of Israel.
Look:
Hannah Allam ✔@HannahAllam
Someone has already made a slight alteration to the map that hangs in Rashida Tlaib’s new congressional office.
10:00 AM - Jan 3, 2019
The note, in particular, drew widespread concern on social media due to Tlaib’s connections to the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign, an insidious anti-Israel movement whose members believe that the world’s only Jewish nation-state shouldn’t exist.
“Many of the founding goals of the BDS movement, including denying the Jewish people the universal right of self-determination — along with many of the strategies employed in BDS campaigns — are anti-Semitic,” the Anti-Defamation League notes.
Mitt Romney’s Awful Plan To Betray Trump Was Shut Down By This Unexpected Person
Mitt Romney fired the first shot in the GOP establishment’s plan to remove Trump from office.
Romney authored an op-ed in the Washington Post that many pundits saw as his first step in taking on Donald Trump in the Republican primary.
But Romney’s awful plan to betray Trump was shut down by this unexpected person.
Romney published an op-ed in the Washington Post two days before he was set to be sworn in as Utah’s junior Senator.
The former failed Presidential candidate savaged Trump for his supposed poor character and whined that globalists like Nikki Haley and James Mattis leaving the administration meant Trump’s Presidency was spiraling out of control.
D.C. Republicans cheered the op-ed.
They claimed Romney admitted out loud what his Senate colleagues only utter in private.
And they salivated over the fact that Romney’s anti-Trump manifesto was either a declaration of his intentions to challenge Trump in 2020, or his plans to support whoever jumps into the GOP primary against Trump.
Even though Romney denied he would run against Trump during a CNN interview, he has lied over the years about so many of his policy positions that his denial is impossible to take seriously.
The former two-time failed Presidential candidate also said he was open to supporting a candidate other than Trump in the 2020 GOP primary.
“I think it’s early to make that decision and I want to see what the alternatives are,” Romney said in a CNN interview with Jake Tapper.
Everyone expected verbal pyrotechnics from Trump in response.
But he offered a relatively muted comeback.
The President pointed out that Romney failed as a Presidential candidate and hoped Romney would support a conservative agenda and not turn into another RINO like former Arizona Senator Jeff Flake.
“Here we go with Mitt Romney, but so fast! Question will be, is he a Flake? I hope not. Would much prefer that Mitt focus on Border Security and so many other things where he can be helpful. I won big, and he didn’t. He should be happy for all Republicans. Be a TEAM player & WIN!” Trump tweeted.
But the strongest response came from inside Romney’s own house.
GOP Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel – who is Romney’s niece – fired back at her uncle on social media.
McDaniel accused Romney of doing the Democrats and fake news media’s dirty work.
“POTUS is attacked and obstructed by the MSM media and Democrats 24/7. For an incoming Republican freshman senator to attack @realdonaldtrump as their first act feeds into what the Democrats and media want and is disappointing and unproductive.”
Inside-the-beltway pundits were stunned.
Amazingly, they cast McDaniel – who defended her party’s President – as the disloyal figure, while they hailed Romney as the principled statesmen for trying to sabotage the will of the American people.
Romney badly miscalculated his op-ed.
Instead of rallying Republicans to rise up against the President, rank-and-file GOP voters saw Romney as a phony opportunist whose first act in the Senate was one of extreme disloyalty.
We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.
G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2019/01/its-2019-i-am-getting-older-everyday.html
Related Posts :
Eddie Khanna: Meet the "New" boss, same as the "Old" boss...
Cat Rambo’s Ideas For The Asking: A Guest Post!
Nickelodeon Italy To Host 'Danger & Thunder Channel' In May 2018
Spring 2018 Nick Box Unboxing | Extra! Extra! The Nick Box News | Nick Swag | Nickelodeon
Nickelodeon Brazil Announces 'Copa Nick Vs Nick' Competition + More May 2018 Highlights
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment