Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.BLOGSPOT.COM
Tues. Jan. 8, 2019
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Trump to deliver prime-time address on 'national security crisis' at the border
by Steven Nelson
President Trump will give a prime-time address from the Oval Office Tuesday evening in an apparent effort to convince lawmakers to fund a border wall, a demand that's led to a more than two-week partial government shutdown.
"I am pleased to inform you that I will Address the Nation on the Humanitarian and National Security crisis on our Southern Border. Tuesday night at 9:00 P.M. Eastern," Trump tweeted.
Shortly before Trump's tweet, CNN reported that he was considering giving a prime-time national address, but that it was unclear if TV networks would air it.
Trump's address is likely to come as negotiators struggle to strike a deal that will end the funding fight, which is impacting roughly 800,000 federal workers. Weekend talks between a White House team led by Vice President Mike Pence and congressional Democrats did not result in a breakthrough.
Trump will visit the Mexican border on Thursday, a day before federal workers risk missing their first paycheck of the shutdown.
Last week, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said that Trump threatened to continue the standoff for "months or even years" if he did not get wall funds. Trump confirmed the remarks during a subsequent Rose Garden press conference, but described talks as "very, very productive."
Trump is seeking $5.7 billion in wall funds, but the White House has indicated it would accept less. Congressional Democrats, however, have said they will approve no wall funds, seeking to deny Trump a chance to fulfill a signature 2016 campaign pledge.
NY Times just traced a children’s cancer cluster to Trump himself. Will there be no bottom?
Seemingly desperate to score another point against President Donald Trump’s administration, The New York Times ran a piece last week that linked a non-recent spate of cancer diagnoses in a Trump-supporting Indiana county to the president’s allegedly harmful environmental policies.
Never mind that the majority of the diagnoses happened before Trump stepped into office, and never mind that the industrial facility that allegedly triggered the outbreak has been out of use for decades.
“The children fell ill, one by one, with cancers that few families in this suburban Indianapolis community had ever heard of,” the Times wrote ominously. “An avid swimmer struck down by glioblastoma, which grew a tumor in her brain. Four children with Ewing’s sarcoma, a rare bone cancer. Fifteen children with acute lymphocytic leukemia, including three cases diagnosed in the past year.”
As the diagnoses began piling up, local families started researching possible causes and discovered an old industrial site nearby that was supposed to have been cleaned up decades ago, but that has been leaking carcinogenic plume into the ground and causing dangerous fumes to be emitted into homes.
What do these events in Johnston County have to do with Trump? Everything, according to the Times.
Hiroko Tabuchi ✔@HirokoTabuchiWhen children fell ill, one by one, with cancers few families in Franklin had ever heard of, they put it down to misfortune. But recent tests have identified a carcinogenic plume spreading underground, releasing vapor into homes. My latest, via @NYTimes https://nyti.ms/2GSjPYS
5:53 PM - Jan 2, 2019
A Trump County Confronts the Administration Amid a Rash of Child Cancers
Parents in Indiana are demanding the clean-up of a toxic site and questioning environmental rollbacks that could prevent future chemical disasters like the one they face. nytimes.com
“Now, families in a county that voted overwhelmingly for President Trump are making demands of his administration that collide directly with one of his main agendas: the rolling back of health and environmental regulations,” the left-wing publisher opined.
But these alleged rollbacks clearly had nothing to do with what happened in Franklin. And there is no evidence to suggest that another Franklin would occur because of these alleged rollbacks.
Nevertheless, the Times claimed that the Trump administration wants to “weaken restrictions” on trichloroethylene (TCE), a harmful chemical used in “aerosol spray degreasers, spot-cleaning agents in dry cleaning, and vapor degreasing.”
That’s false. Though the Obama administration announced plans in early 2017 to ban TCE, when the Trump administration took over it discarded those plans. Instead of just letting the issue rest, however, the admin did place the chemical on a “long term action” list.
“At 21.7 cases of pediatric cancer per 100,000 children, Johnson County’s rate puts it in the 80th percentile among counties nationwide, according to data for 2011-2015 from the National Cancer Institute,” the Times continued. “Both the national and Indiana average are fewer than 18 pediatric cancers per 100,000 children.”
Not only is that not a notable outlier, but this anecdotal anomaly doesn’t prove anything. In fact, Dr. Paolo Boffetta, a professor of environmental medicine and public health at the Icahn School of Medicine New York, even admitted as much to the Times.
While he conceded that “[y]ou don’t expect to see so many cancers in a relatively small community,” he reportedly stressed that there’s little research linking childhood cancers to TCE.
“Motria Caudill, a scientist at the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, which investigates environmental hazards, said at a community meeting in Franklin in November that it was still too early to draw conclusions,” the Times added.
This raises the question, what was the point of this piece? And why did it contain 20 references to the president, when the known facts show that the outbreak has little to nothing to do with him?
What Nevada’s Anti-Brothel Activists Can Learn from Star Trek
(Chuck Muth) – Remember the 1982 movie “Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan”?
Khan Noonien Singh was the evil bad guy who sent a pair of assassins to knock off his longtime nemesis, Captain Kirk. Alas, the hitmen failed – which Khan realized when Kirk, instead of one of his assassins, responded to Khan’s radio call.
“Kirk,” Khan says with surprise, “you're still alive, my old friend.”
“Still, old, friend,” Kirk replies. “You've managed to kill just about everyone else, but, like a poor marksman, you keep missing the target.”
Anti-sex trafficking advocates who continue to attack Nevada’s legal brothel industry should keep that scene in mind. Because they, too, keep missing the target.
To remind them of what the real target SHOULD be, consider this December 30, 2018 story in the Albion Times…
“Two Long Island men, including a ‘self-described Crips gang member,’ were arrested for the kidnapping and sex trafficking of two girls - one of whom was only 12 years old, police said Thursday.
“Fredjy Exavier and Terron Newsome, both 22 and from Central Islip, were arrested Wednesday morning on a slew of charges that stemmed from the sex trafficking of the 12-year-old and a second victim, who was raped at the age of 13 and prostituted, Suffolk County police said.”
According to the police report, the thugs took the girls from the group home where they were living and drove them to a motel “where Newsome attempted to have the 12-year-old girl engage in sexual activities with him and encouraged her to become a prostitute.”
THAT’S sex trafficking of underage girls – and these two should be drawn and quartered for it.
The girls were rescued from the motel and the dirtbags arrested after one of the girls managed to call her former foster parent, who then called police to report they were being held “against their will.”
“I know she’s young,” Exavier told police. “She looked like 15 or 16, but not 12 years old.”
As if 15 or 16 makes it any better!
Sadly, this isn’t an isolated case in New York. It’s going on every day all over the country, including in Nevada.
But you know where it’s NOT happening?
In Nevada’s legal brothels.
In order to work in a legal Nevada brothel, the women are REQUIRED to obtain a sheriff’s work card, which they can only receive after an extensive FBI background check to verify their age and identify any criminal history.
As such, there is no trafficking of underage girls going on in Nevada’s legal brothels. None.
So if the objective is to eradicate the sex-trafficking of underage girls, as it should be, activists targeting Nevada’s legal brothels keep missing the target.
In Nevada’s legal brothels, you have consenting adult customers doing business with consenting adult service providers. The businesses and all of their workers are licensed, regulated and taxed.
They are NOT the problem.
Those claiming otherwise who are trying to shut down Nevada’s legal brothels are bad marksmen. They need to redirect their fire.
Trey Gowdy’s Brief View On Military Discrimination
Trey Gowdy’s Brief View On Military Discrimination
Trey Gowdy, South Carolina Congressman, recently responded to a CNN reporter's question about the Dept. of Defense's ban of transgenders from joining the U.S Armed Forces. As Trey typically does so very well, he nailed it smack on!
Question: How can President Trump claim to represent all U.S. citizens, regardless of sexual orientation, when he banned transgenders from joining the military? Isn't that discrimination?
Trey Gowdy's Response:
"Nobody has a 'right' to serve in the military. Nobody. What makes people think the military is an equal opportunity employer? It is very far from it, and for good reasons Let me cite a few:
The military uses 'prejudice', regularly and consistently, to deny citizens from joining: for being too old or too young, too fat or too skinny, too tall or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat feet, or for missing (or additional) fingers."
Clearly annoyed by the reporter's attempt to trap him with the question, he went on to explain:
"By the way, poor eyesight will disqualify you, as well as bad teeth.
Malnourished? Drug addiction? Bad back? Criminal history? Low IQ?
Anxiety? Phobias? Hearing damage? Six arms? Hear voices in your head? Self-identification as a unicorn? Need a special access ramp for your wheelchair?"
"Can't run the required course in the required time? Can't do the required number of push-ups? Not really a 'morning person' - and refuse to get out of bed before noon? All can be legitimate reasons for denial."
"The military has one job: winning wars Anything else is a distraction and a liability. Did someone just scream 'That isn't Fair!'? Well, war is VERY unfair. There are no exceptions made for being 'special', or 'challenged', or 'socially wonderful'."
"YOU must change yourself to meet military standards...not the other way around."
"I say it again: YOU don't change the military...you must change yourself. The military doesn't need to accommodate anyone with special issues. The Military needs to win wars, and keep our country safe..PERIOD!"
"If any of your personal issues are a liability that detract from readiness or lethality - thank you for applying, and good luck in future endeavors."
"....any other questions?"
Republican Senator Unleashes on Mitt Romney, Calls Him ‘Jeff Flake on Steroids’
BY C. DOUGLAS GOLDEN
Shutterstock; Townhall / Twitter screenshot...Utah Sen. Mitt Romney, left, the Republican presidential nominee of 2012, made himself a target of attacks by Republicans like Sen. David Perdue of Georgia, right, when he used a Washington Post commentary piece last week to fault President Donald Trump.In a commentary piece for The Washington Post, GOP Sen. David Perdue of Georgia unleashed on newly minted Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, calling him “Jeff Flake on steroids” and saying that Romney’s own piece in the Post last week is proof of why he lost the 2012 election.
Romney’s column, published Tuesday, excoriated the president for what Romney saw as poor personnel moves and personal failings on Trump’s part.
“It is well known that Donald Trump was not my choice for the Republican presidential nomination. After he became the nominee, I hoped his campaign would refrain from resentment and name-calling. It did not,” Romney wrote.
“When he won the election, I hoped he would rise to the occasion. His early appointments of Rex Tillerson, Jeff Sessions, Nikki Haley, Gary Cohn, H.R. McMaster, Kelly and Mattis were encouraging. But, on balance, his conduct over the past two years, particularly his actions last month, is evidence that the president has not risen to the mantle of the office.”
Romney wrote that “I will act as I would with any president, in or out of my party: I will support policies that I believe are in the best interest of the country and my state, and oppose those that are not. I do not intend to comment on every tweet or fault. But I will speak out against significant statements or actions that are divisive, racist, sexist, anti-immigrant, dishonest or destructive to democratic institutions.”
“With his attempted character assassination of the president, a fellow Republican, Romney put self-interest ahead of the larger national interest: conservative Republican governance,” Perdue wrote.
When he ran for president and failed, Romney has taken a stance that smacks of jealousy and resentment. It does nothing but serve the radical liberal left and further divides conservatives,” he said.
“As the only former chief executive of a Fortune 500 company in Congress, I was initially thrilled by the prospect of welcoming another business guy to the Senate. But Romney’s behavior — before he was sworn in or cast his first vote as the new senator from Utah — was deeply disappointing.”
Romney, Perdue wrote, “ran to the media instead of picking up the phone. That is exactly what is wrong with Washington.”
“The mainstream media and Democrats want to further divide Republicans, and now Romney has played right into their hands,” he wrote.
“Jeff Flake (Ariz.) filled that role before his retirement; the last thing we need now in the Senate is a Jeff Flake on steroids. We certainly don’t need more distractions. We need constructive leaders who want to get things done.”
Flake, of course, is openly considering a 2020 run after spending the last two years of his term brutally attacking Trump at every turn.
Perdue’s column got plenty of attention, but he was hardly the only person attacking Romney.
Townhall.com ✔@townhallcom
Did you see what Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) had to say about Romney's anti-Trump 11:29
Ronna McDaniel, the Republican National Committee chairwoman, attacked the Utah senator on Twitter.
POTUS is attacked and obstructed by the MSM media and Democrats 24/7. For an incoming Republican freshman senator to attack @realdonaldtrump as their first act feeds into what the Democrats and media want and is disappointing and unproductive.
“For an incoming Republican freshman senator to attack @realdonaldtrump as their first act feeds into what the Democrats and media want and is disappointing and unproductive,” she wrote.
Why is that important? Well, McDaniel is Romney’s niece. She was also responding to a tweet from the president in which he compared Romney to Flake.
Here we go with Mitt Romney, but so fast! Question will be, is he a Flake? I hope not. Would much prefer that Mitt focus on Border Security and so many other things where he can be helpful. I won big, and he didn’t. He should be happy for all Republicans. Be a TEAM player & WIN!
We don’t know how Mitt Romney will turn out as a senator. He was decidedly average as a presidential candidate (and that’s being charitable) and his time as governor of Massachusetts was solid, if unspectacular.
However, given that he was sniping at the president before his term even began, it’s certainly not a good augury.
Economically Illiterate Communist Democrat
Julian Castro cites 90 percent tax on rich in defending Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on tax hikes
by Naomi Lim
"There was a time in this country where the top marginal tax rate was over 90 percent, even during Reagan's era in the 1980s it was around 50 percent" the former mayor of San Antonio, Texas, said.Likely 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Julian Castro agrees with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez that tax rates on some of the wealthiest Americans should skyrocket.
"Oh, I can support folks at the top paying their fair share," Castro told ABC News' "This Week" on Sunday when asked directly whether he could endorse the high-profile New York Democrat's idea.
The Obama-era Housing and Urban Development secretary, who is expected to officially announce he's running for the White House this week, made the comments after Ocasio-Cortez caught flak for suggesting people earning more than $10 million could be taxed between "60 or 70 percent."
In offering support to Ocasio-Cortez, Castro provided historical context given the current highest marginal income tax bracket is 37 percent for those receiving more than $500,000 a year.
"There was a time in this country where the top marginal tax rate was over 90 percent, even during Reagan's era in the 1980s it was around 50 percent" the former mayor of San Antonio, Texas, said.
Castro also floated "that we get more serious about making sure the corporations pay their fair share," so the country can fund policy programs like "Medicare-for-All," as well as universal pre-kindergarten and higher education.
"During this campaign, if I run, I'm going to be very up front with the American people on how we would do that because I think that they are owed that, but it is worth it. It is worth it in this country for us to do that," he said, vowing not to be "a single issue candidate."
Castro additionally responded to criticism he didn't have the foreign policy experience to be the next occupant of the Oval Office. He said his time serving in former President Barack Obama's Cabinet and as San Antonio's mayor "certainly qualifies one to be commander in chief." Last month Castro said he believed U.S. troops should be pulled from Syria though he would have handled the situation differently to President Trump.
Castro formed a presidential exploratory committee in December. He is scheduled to hold a press conference to discuss his 2020 plans on Dec. 12.
Trump adviser outlines conditions for US pullout from Syria
Trump adviser outlines conditions for US pullout from Syria
JERUSALEM (AP) — President Donald Trump’s national security adviser said Sunday that the American military withdrawal from northeastern Syria is conditioned on defeating the remnants of the Islamic State group and on Turkey assuring the safety of U.S.-allied Kurdish fighters.
John Bolton said there is no timetable for the pullout, but insisted the military presence is not an unlimited commitment.
“There are objectives that we want to accomplish that condition the withdrawal,” Bolton told reporters in Jerusalem before heading to Turkey on Monday, where he will be joined by the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford. “The timetable flows from the policy decisions that we need to implement.”
Those conditions, he said, included defeating what’s left of IS in Syria and protecting Kurdish militias who have fought alongside U.S. troops against the extremist group.
Bolton’s comments were the first public confirmation that the drawdown has been slowed. Trump had faced widespread criticism from allies about his decision, announced in mid-December, that he was pulling all 2,000 U.S. troops from Syria. Officials said at the time that although many details of the withdrawal had not yet been finalized, they expected American forces to be out by mid-January.
Trump’s move, which led to the resignation of U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, has raised fears over clearing the way for a Turkish assault on the Kurdish fighters. Turkey considers the Syrian Kurdish People’s Protection Units, or YPG, a terrorist group linked to an insurgency within its own borders.
Bolton said the U.S. is insisting that its Kurdish allies in Syria are protected from any planned Turkish offensive — a warning he was expected to deliver to Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, this week.
“We don’t think the Turks ought to undertake military action that’s not fully coordinated with and agreed to by the United States,” Bolton said. He said that in upcoming meetings with Turkish officials he will seek “to find out what their objectives and capabilities are and that remains uncertain.”
Trump has made clear that he would not allow Turkey to kill the Kurds, Bolton said. “That’s what the president said, the ones that fought with us.”
Bolton said the U.S. has asked the Kurds to “stand fast now” and refrain from seeking protection from Russia or Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government. “I think they know who their friends are,” he added, speaking of the Kurds.
Jim Jeffrey, the special representative for Syrian engagement and the newly named American special envoy for the anti-Islamic State coalition, is to travel to Syria this coming week in an effort to reassure the Kurdish fighters that they are not being abandoned, Bolton said.
Turkey’s presidential spokesman called allegations that his country planned to attack the U.S.-allied Kurds in Syria “irrational” and said Turkey was fighting terrorism for national security.
In comments carried by the official Anadolu news agency, Ibrahim Kalin said the Kurdish fighters oppressed Syrian Kurds and pursued a separatist agenda under the guise of fighting IS. “That a terror organization cannot be allied with the U.S. is self-evident,” he said.
Bolton said U.S. troops would remain at the critical area of al-Tanf, in southern Syria, to counter growing Iranian activity in the region. He defended the legal basis for the deployment, saying it’s justified by the president’s constitutional authority.
The U.S. is also seeking a “satisfactory disposition” for roughly 800 IS prisoners held by the U.S.-backed Syrian opposition, Bolton said, adding talks were ongoing with European and regional partners about the issue.
Bolton was to have dinner with Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, on Sunday to discuss the pace of the U.S. drawdown, American troop levels in the region, and the U.S. commitment to push back on Iranian regional expansionism.
Bolton was expected to explain that some U.S. troops based in Syria to fight IS will shift to Iraq with the same mission and that the al-Tanf base would remain.
Bolton also was to convey the message that the United States is “very supportive” of Israeli strikes against Iranian targets in Syria, according to a senior administration official, who was not authorized to publicly discuss Bolton’s plans before the meetings and spoke on condition of anonymity.
Bolton on Sunday also toured the ancient tunnels beneath the Western Wall in Jerusalem’s Old City. He watched a virtual reality tour of the historic site and dined there with his Israeli equivalent, as well as U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman and Israel’s ambassador to the U.S., Ron Dermer.
Visiting American officials typically avoid holding official meetings in parts of east Jerusalem, which is contested between Israelis and Palestinians. Trump, however, also toured the area in a previous visit.
Israel annexed east Jerusalem after capturing it from Jordan in the 1967 war, a move not recognized by most of the international community. Palestinians seek east Jerusalem as the capital of their future state.
___
Associated Press writer Zeynep Bilginsoy in Istanbul contributed to this report.
THE 8 BIGGEST LIES OF 2018
THE 8 BIGGEST LIES OF 2018
Joseph Farah nails brazen untruths circulating amidst mainstream media
1. “Trump has not risen to the mantle of the office.” This cheap shot from Mitt Romney actually came in 2019, but I suspect it was a brazen untruth scripted in 2018. Furthermore, I couldn’t wait another year for the 2019 list. Romney is clearly gunning for another shot at the big show. This will not help him in the least. All it does is show us there’s one more Republican vote in the Senate right-thinking Americans cannot count on. This is what I think: Donald Trump has exceeded every hope and expectation I could possibly have had for him. And I think I speak for more Americans than those who voted for Mitt Romney.
2.”Walls don’t work.” How many times have you heard this despicable prevarication uttered on the fake news or by Democratic Party mouthpieces in the last 30 days? You’ve heard it said that the biggest lies can deceive if only they are repeated often enough and loudly enough. It’s all they’ve got. Even a Democrat who builds a wall or fence around his or her property for privacy and security knows deep down in his soul walls work. It’s silly. It insults our intelligence when we hear such drivel. Walls have proven very effective in Israel, where terrorist attacks have been cut 90 percent. They also proved effective in 2008 in Egypt where the U.S. government’s Army Corp of Engineers helped Cairo erect them along the country’s border with Gaza.
3. “Trump colluded with Russians to impact 2016 election.” This disinformation campaign represents one of the most successful in the history of fake media. One recent poll showed 42 percent of Americans believe that Russian operatives actually meddled with votes in that election. Not only is there no evidence that happened, there are no credible claims by anyone that it ever happened. It’s nothing more than a hoax perpetrated willingly by partisan media hacks.
4. “President Trump is a racist.” These despicable claims are made daily, hourly and by the minute on 24-hour cable news and in the 24/7 Internet blab-isphere. Yet no one has ever actually cited a single racist comment, inflection or hand signal by Trump in his long public life. Certainly no Democratic politicians ever rejected donations from him based on such convictions. But in 2018, perhaps the most outrageous claim came from Kirsten Powers who insisted on CNN that anyone who voted for Trump is a “racist.” She said: “I think one of the first things is that people will say that, uh, they support him for reasons other than his racist language … and they’ll say, ‘Well, I’m not racist, I just voted for him because I didn’t like Hillary Clinton,’ and I just want to say that’s not — that doesn’t make you not racist. It actually makes you racist. If you support somebody that’s racist, that makes you racist. So, I just want to establish that.” Just making outrageous defamatory claims establishes nothing.
5. “Climate change is settled science.” Soon it will be impossible for reasonable people who disagree whether the economic and political world order should be reconstructed on the theory that man-made catastrophic climate change is on the imminent horizon, if not already here. Take “Meet the Press,” please. New host Chuck Todd announced on the show Dec. 30 that there would be no dissent allowed – no debate on the issue because it was “settled science”: “But just as important as what we are going to do this hour is what we’re not going to do,” Todd explained to the audience. “We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter. And human activity is a major cause, period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.” Will re-education camps be next? Will it soon be considered a “hate crime” to question the “science”? Will it get you banned on Facebook? How about the president of the United States? Will he, too, no longer be welcomed as a guest on “Meet the Press”?
6. “Trump supporters spew hate.” I suppose there are some who do, though they seem difficult to find in comparison to their political opponents who boycott, harass, intimidate, confront, violently attack, defame, curse and, obviously, accuse them of hate – which is, obviously, a hateful thing to do.
7. “Pretty much everything the Washington Post writes.” If you doubt me, here is Exhibit A in my case: Read this story and tell me if you think you will ever see this hopeless Jeff Bezos scandal sheet tell the truth about Trump. It’s not going to happen.
8. “They’re not going to do that …” That’s what CNN’s Jim Acosta argued the Central American caravan would never do – storm the border or attempt an “invasion.” Of course we all know that is exactly what happened upon its arrival. Just watch this to appreciate Acosta’s lies. Why does this guy still have a job in which he is paid to argue with the president of the United States – even when he is dead wrong, which is most of the time?
If I didn’t nail them, please send me your best contribution of the biggest lie of 2018.
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/the-8-biggest-lies-of-2018/#mMF2MP7rLXIpvUSx.99
‘Who are you?’ Judge Jeanine taunts foul-mouthed new Dem Congresswomen: ‘You don’t have the guts …’
‘Who are you?’ Judge Jeanine taunts foul-mouthed new Dem Congresswomen: ‘You don’t have the guts …’
Fox News’ Jeanine Pirro got 2019 off to a fiery start on “Justice with Judge Jeanine,” tearing into Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., for her vulgar remarks regarding President Donald Trump.
Tlaib, a Palestinian-American and one of the two first Muslim women to be elected to Congress in November, told a group of supporters on her first official day in office that with Democrats holding a majority in the House, “we’re gonna go in there and we’re gonna impeach the motherf–ker.”
Pirro dedicated her Opening Statement to the Democrat’s shameful remark, telling Tlaib that her first act was to violate the very Constitution she “just swore to uphold.”
“Our country allows your family to come here and start a new life in America, with all its advantages and protections and privileges, nothing like what they experienced in Palestine,” she said. “And your first act after the privilege of running for Congress and winning a seat in that hallowed chamber, the People’s House, is to curse out the president of the United States? Promising his impeachment with absolutely no facts to support the charge, violating the very constitution you just swore to uphold.”
“By the way, show me where in the Constitution, Rashida, it says you can impeach a president because you hate him?” Pirro said. “The greatest nation on Earth through its largess opens its doors and lays out the welcome mat for your mother and father, who I’m sure thanked God when they got here, and you get to the national stage and call the commander-in-chief a mother f–ker in a public forum demanding impeachment? Who are you?”
The Fox News host proceeded to describe who Tlaib is, to include noting that she’s an open socialist. Pirro also told the radical leftist that she was elected to represent Americans not Palestinians, as she spoke of the lawmaker’s hatred of Israel.
Pirro told Tlaib her constituents want legislators who will work “instead of engaging in personal vendettas against the president.”
“The Democrats’ hatred of the president is astonishing,” she said. “Their hypocrisy is astonishing.”
Calling attention to Tlaib literally running from the press when confronted over her profane remarks, Pirro pointed out just how much Democrats hate Trump.
Conservative News@BIZPACReviewRep. Tlaib defends vulgar attack on Trump from keyboard, but watch her run like heck from reporters http://dlvr.it/QvzVSP
2:03 PM - Jan 4, 2019
2:03 PM - Jan 4, 2019
“You call him an M-fer because you don’t like the way he talks,” she said. “But you don’t have the guts to follow through with your claim. When you are confronted by the press you whimper away and run from the American media. Did Nancy [Pelosi] rein you in, Rashida?”
Pirro also had a parting shot for the socialist.
“You want Donald Trump out of office. Be careful what you wish for. He’s not the only one who can be voted out in 2020,” she warned.
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2019/01/www_7.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment