Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.BLOGSPOT. COM
Thurs. Feb. 7, 2019
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Is Senator Chuckie Schumer secretly Snydlee Whiplash…?
The Democrats are Taking the “United” Out of the United States
The American people have long enjoyed shared traditions–things like going to a movie, reading stories of princesses and princes to their young children to inspire their imagination, and watching the Super Bowl every year. There was a time when partisan politics stopped at the water’s edge, when Americans could disagree and still live their lives. Those days are gone. For decades, the radical American Left–a tiny, but vocal and well-organized group of extremists–have focused their time and energy on taking the united out of the United States. They have attempted to restrain and change our language, so as to stymie debate and to fundamentally change the way we think about important things. After all, as George Orwell warned, if you control the language you can control thought.Everything that the Left has sought to accomplish, such as mainstreaming gay marriage or transsexualism, were things once considered anathema by most Americans. While many have empathy for the small minority of people who are either gay or transsexual, the fact was that few in either political party deemed it wise to rewrite the basic structure of our society to allow radical notions to drive policy. But, a ceaseless assault on the language–coupled with a never-ending media blitz meant to reinforce the Left’s preferred policies–has slowly changed the way Americans view these issues.
For gay marriage, the Left stopped any serious argument over whether it would be a net benefit for society or not. Instead, they made everyone focus on the unrelated notion that “consenting adults” should be free “to love whoever they want.” That was not the issue. It never was. But, the emotional language and the forceful repetition of the narrative was enough to drown out all but the most extreme opposition to the concept of “gay marriage.”
Meanwhile, P.C. language was used to blunt opposition to normalizing transsexual behavior. In the 1970s, the American Psychiatric Association formally recognized transsexualism as a psychiatric disorder called “Gender Dysmorphia.” After years of incessant lobbying by the American left, after engaging in a sustained campaign to both change the language of the debate and to silence any critics of this policy, an alternative lifestyle has now become a new “normal.” Because of this new policy forced upon the American public, a tiny fraction of people who may be in need of psychiatric assistance are often given taxpayer-funded sex change surgery–and anyone who dares questions this program is referred to as “transphobic,” and systematically destroyed politically.
Something similar occurred with the abortion debate in the United States.
Once considered a grave evil by most Americans, after the decade of radical politics of the 1960s, abortion became an acceptable form of contraception, codified into law with the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision. Since then, over 60 million unborn children have been murdered in the womb. When reading the arguments for abortion (even the term itself is sterile), it is rare to hear pro-abortion advocates talk about human fetuses as anything other than a lifeless cluster of cells that is no different from a cancerous tumor, to be removed through surgical methods.
By forcing Americans to accept the term “abortion” rather than “infanticide” or “murder,” and by giving the barbaric practice the veneer of medical legitimacy through sterile language, the public no longer viewed children being killed as children. The Left’s co opting of the language fundamentally altered the public’s perception of the act and made the inured to the horrors that were being committed in their name.
These issues are representative of the sustained assault visited upon the United States by the radical Left. They have helped to divide and fragment the citizens of this country. Not content to divide Americans over issues of reproductive and identity politics–things that determine interpersonal relationships and community-building–the Left has now striven to stymie whatever joy Americans may feel from shared cultural experiences.
Over the weekend, Americans witnessed the most boring Super Bowl in the history of the NFL. To compound matters for most Americans, the commercials were a constant assault against the values that most American hold dear. The commercials repeated the incessant chant heard in the media on the need for women’s rights; they advocated for an embrace of inefficient “green” energy, and they perpetuated a narrative that America is racist. Rather than joy, most Americans watching the Super Bowl experienced a morose, Leftist morality play in which American traditions and values were deemed to be wrong or patriarchal.
The Left even came out to decry Mary Poppins–the classic film about a nanny who teaches unruly children the values of respect, love, and creativity–for being racist. You see, in one scene of the film, Mary Poppins goes through a chimney and is covered in soot. She walks about part of the film with soot plastered across her face. The Left now claims that was a subliminal racist image; that Poppins was, in fact, wearing blackface. The pall of racism now hangs over an innocent film which countless Americans have watched as part of a traditional, wholesome upbringing.
And, the Left spent much effort last year castigating parents who let their daughters watch Disney princess films (or allow them to read classic tales about princes and princesses). The Left believed that these classic stories perpetuated “gender imbalances” that favor boys and other forms of “inequality.” So now, parents are made to feel guilt and shame for trying to raise their children with the same basic values and traditions that they were brought up with.
Thus, these shared experiences are now considered politically incorrect. They must be altered to better comport with the radical whims of the Left and to cater to the most extreme individuals with a deranged worldview. The Leftists have broken apart the common bonds which once defined our society; they have interfered in natural human relations by wrongly changing the language to fundamentally alter perceptions, so that they can override our Western Culture and replace it with something inimical to the values of most Americans–and certainly the values of our Founding Fathers.
They must be resisted at all costs before the Left irreparably destroys our culture.
Cory Booker Asks Idiotic Questions of District Court Nominee
By S.Noble
By S.Noble
Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) embarrassed himself while questioning D.C. Circuit Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Neomi Rao during her confirmation hearing.
Booker asked, “Have you ever had any LGBTQ law clerks?”
Rao responded, “Senator, I’ve yet to be a judge. I don’t have law clerks.”
Her next answer was terrific when Booker asked about LGBTs on her current staff.
“To be honest I don’t know the sexual orientation of my staff. I take people as they come irrespective of their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation. I treat people as individuals. Those are the values I grew up with and those are the values I would apply if confirmed,” she said.
“I treat people as individuals”.
Why is this numbskull asking about her employees’ personal lives? Who cares as long as they can do the job?
BOOKER USED A RELIGIOUS TEST ON MS. RAO
He asked her if she thought “gay relationships are immoral.” Her answer was, “I do not.”
Then he wanted to know if she thought it was a sin. She said she puts her religious views aside for her position. This is the rest of the ridiculous dialogue:
“So you’re not willing to say whether you believe it is sinful for a man — for two men — to be married?” the senator pressed once again.
“No,” Rao responded.
“Excuse me?” Booker said.
“My response is that these personal views are ones that I would put to one side. Whatever my personal views are on the subject, I would faithfully follow the precedent of the Supreme Court,” the nominee said.
Senator Cruz blasted him for it:
“We’ve seen a growing pattern among Senate Democrats of hostility to religious faith. I have to say I was deeply troubled a few minutes ago to hear questioning of a nominee, asking your personal views on what is sinful,” he said.
“In my view that has no business in this committee. Article Six of the Constitution says there should be no religious test for any public office.”
Booker asked, “Have you ever had any LGBTQ law clerks?”
Rao responded, “Senator, I’ve yet to be a judge. I don’t have law clerks.”
Her next answer was terrific when Booker asked about LGBTs on her current staff.
“To be honest I don’t know the sexual orientation of my staff. I take people as they come irrespective of their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation. I treat people as individuals. Those are the values I grew up with and those are the values I would apply if confirmed,” she said.
“I treat people as individuals”.
Why is this numbskull asking about her employees’ personal lives? Who cares as long as they can do the job?
BOOKER USED A RELIGIOUS TEST ON MS. RAO
He asked her if she thought “gay relationships are immoral.” Her answer was, “I do not.”
Then he wanted to know if she thought it was a sin. She said she puts her religious views aside for her position. This is the rest of the ridiculous dialogue:
“So you’re not willing to say whether you believe it is sinful for a man — for two men — to be married?” the senator pressed once again.
“No,” Rao responded.
“Excuse me?” Booker said.
“My response is that these personal views are ones that I would put to one side. Whatever my personal views are on the subject, I would faithfully follow the precedent of the Supreme Court,” the nominee said.
Senator Cruz blasted him for it:
“We’ve seen a growing pattern among Senate Democrats of hostility to religious faith. I have to say I was deeply troubled a few minutes ago to hear questioning of a nominee, asking your personal views on what is sinful,” he said.
“In my view that has no business in this committee. Article Six of the Constitution says there should be no religious test for any public office.”
Virginia AG admits HE wore blackface in college too, while lt. gov caught saying ‘f*** that b**ch’ about accuser
Frieda Powers
Things just went from bad to worse in Virginia politics.
The state’s Democratic attorney general admitted Wednesday that he wore blackface during a college party decades ago, dropping the bombshell as Virginia’s governor and lieutenant governor have been battling controversy and calls to resign.
Mark Herring revealed in a statement that in 1980 while attending the University of Virginia, he had put on brown makeup and a wig to look like a black rapper at a party, Fox News reported.
“In 1980, when I was a 19-year-old undergraduate in college, some friends suggested we attend a party dressed like rappers we listened to at the time, like Kurtis Blow, and perform a song,” Herring said. “It sounds ridiculous even now writing it. But because of our ignorance and glib attitudes — and because we did not have an appreciation for the experiences and perspectives of others — we dressed up and put on wigs and brown makeup.”
“This was a one time occurrence and I accept full responsibility for my conduct,” he said, adding that “the shame of that moment has haunted me for decades.”
Donald Trump Jr. ✔@DonaldJTrumpJrOMG! What’s wrong with the Virginia Democratic Party? First the governor, then the Lt Gov’s problems now the third in line, the states Attorney General, another Democrat has a “blackface” problem!
It’s almost like Democrats are totally full of crap! Disgusting!
As one of three top statewide elected officials, Herring would be next in line to be governor after Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam and Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax, who are also Democrats. Herring’s statement came after he had called for the governor’s resignation over the weekend, saying “It is no longer possible for Governor Northam to lead our Commonwealth and it is time for him to step down.”
The embattled governor has been under fire since a racist photo from his medical school yearbook surfaced, prompting the outcry and calls for him to step down. Northam acknowledged, then denied, being in the photo and has so far refused to vacate his seat.
An allegation of sexual assault against Fairfax, who would succeed Northam if he resigned, plunged the state into chaos as Democrats scrambled to respond.
Fairfax claimed an encounter woman he met at the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston was consensual as he denied her accusation of assault, further deteriorating the left’s “believe all women” narrative in the wake of the contentious confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
NBC News political reporter, Jonathan Allen, tweeted that Fairfax tried to “discredit his accuser” on Monday during a private meeting.
Jonathan Allen ✔@jonallendcJustin Fairfax said “fuck that bitch” as he tried to discredit his accuser during a private meeting Monday night, sources tell @NBCNews’ @GeoffRBennett and me.
Herring, who is serving his second term as attorney general, said Wednesday that wearing blackface was “no way reflective of the man I have become in the nearly 40 years since.”
Virginia’s Democratic Party would not respond to a request for comment from Fox News but a spokesman reportedly told the network, “We’re not taking any calls right now.”
I bet there’s a bunch of people wearing wet diapers at the VA donkeys’ headquarters.
Look at What OMao-Cortez Calls an Embarrassment
By S.Noble
Look at What OMao-Cortez Calls an Embarrassment
By S.Noble
President Trump recognized Holocaust survivors, war heroes who fought against Nazis, Holocaust survivors, victims of illegal alien criminals, a child with cancer, a bullied little boy, felons who reformed, and the law enforcement officer that stopped the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting and took seven bullets. Alexandria O-Cortez must have missed all that.
She missed the President’s plea to hold life sacred and to protect the late-term unborn and the born alive. This isn’t coat hanger days people.
When the President pleaded for border security to hold back crime and human trafficking, where was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?
What doesn’t she get about “state of the union” being about the state of the union? It’s not a Socialist planning meeting as she seems to think.
When the President talked about the great economy that has helped minorities and provided them with the best unemployment numbers in our history, was Cortez on her phone?
Alexandria OMao-Cortez called the State of the Union an “embarrassment.” Isn’t she the caring one! She totally missed the point, and has no heart.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ✔@AOCWhy should I be “spirited and warm” for this embarrassment of a #SOTU? Tonight was an unsettling night for our country. The president failed to offer any plan, any vision at all, for our future. We’re flying without a pilot. And I‘m not here to comfort anyone about that fact.
Peggy Noonan ✔@Peggynoonannyc
And good natured with the white jackets, who I see some on twitter are calling the straight jackets. AOC had a rare bad night, looking not spirited, warm and original as usual but sullen, teenaged and at a loss.
So just what is Speaker Nancy Pelosi reading during the State of the Union address anyway?
by Brett T.
‘Whoa!’ Did Dem Sen. Jacky Rosen really tell Kyrsten Sinema to ‘watch your a**’ for applauding Trump?
G’ day…Ciao…Helen & Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2019/02/www_6.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment