Title :
link :
http://ift.tt/2t3211e
.BLOGSPOT. COM.
For ., Mon., Nov. 13, 2017
~All Gave Some~Some Gave
All~God Bless America
For us old guys…
From a friend:
Ann Marie Senese It is a bit fishy eh?
Mark asked his audience: How did the WaPo know there were four women, who they were, and how to contact them?… A Washington Post reporter just happens to be in Alabama talking to Roy Moore supporters… And he happens to hear what no one has reported in 38 years, no political opponents – No one… That Roy Moore, 38 years ago, made advances to teenage girls. Four of them. Now, the four girls do not know each other, they have never met. Yet the person who the Post reporter happened to run into and speak to, the person who supposedly told the reporter the story about the four girls, happened to know all four girls and how to contact them?
Seriously?
Great question Ann Marie. Seriously!...Moe Lauzier
Ann Marie strikes again.
Mueller Targeted In Major Lawsuit, This Is Big
Ben Baker
CLICK TO JOIN
An issue many Republicans had with special counsel Robert Mueller heading the investigation into Russia meddling was his friendship with former FBI Director James Comey.
According to the Washington Examiner, conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch is concerned this friendship may have had a role in the investigation. They are suing the Justice Department to determine if Mr. Comey had “coordinated” with Mr. Mueller before appearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee in June.
When Mr. Comey was fired by President Trump, many on the Left believed it was an effort to impede investigations into President Trump and his team to determine if they had colluded with Russia to win the election.
This resulted in Mr. Comey appearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee and delivering his testimony regarding the matter.
Judicial Watch is concerned that Mr. Comey may have “closely coordinated” with Mr. Mueller when preparing his statements. One concern they might have is that the testimony was tailored in such a way to fuel Mr. Mueller’s investigative efforts.
Concerned, the Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Justice Department to obtain documents regarding the communications between Mr. Comey and the Justice Department. The Justice Department missed the deadline to deliver those documents voluntarily.
Now Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit demanding “all records of communications.” President of the Judicial Watch, Tom Fitton, believes their fears may be more justified now that the Justice Department has failed to cooperate.
Mr. Fitton said Tuesday, “It would be a scandal if Comey coordinated his Senate testimony with Mr. Mueller’s special counsel office. That we have had to sue in federal court speaks volumes.”
is lawsuit is part of a long-term concern those on the Right have had with Mr. Mueller heading the investigation and any biases he may have brought with him. One particular concern is that his long-standing friendship with Mr. Comey may have put him at odds with President Trump and eradicated any of his objectivity.
Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) believes this friendship alone is justification enough to have Mr. Mueller removed from the investigations. “No one knows Mr. Mueller’s true intentions, but neither can anyone dispute that he now clearly appears to be a partisan arbiter of justice. Accordingly, the law is also explicitly clear: he must step down based on this conflict of interest.”
According to The Hill, President Trump had concerns about Mr. Mueller’s friendship with Comey and that many of his team are “Hillary Clinton supporters.”
Regardless of whatever biases Mr. Mueller appears to have, President Trump seems to have no concerns about what the investigation’s findings will be, “Well he’s very, very good friends with Comey. Which is very bothersome.We’re going to have to see. But there has been no obstruction, there has been no collusion. There has been leaking by Comey. And virtually everyone agrees on that.”
Admittedly, it’s not unusual if Mr. Mueller had prepared Mr. Comey for the hearing–prosecutors do coordinate with witnesses–but it’s another layer of concern about the potential bias and lack of objectivity Mr. Mueller has in the investigation. Especially when the Justice Department has failed to shed light on the matter by not delivering those documents.
This Little Girl is Alive Today Because Pro-Life People Were Outside the Abortion Clinic
INTERNATIONAL LONDON, ENGLAND
Yesterday, a mother’s testimony of how she was helped by pro-life counsellors outside an abortion clinic was read out in Parliament. Sir Edward Leigh, Conservative MP for Gainsborough, delivered the testimony of “Kate”, during a debate led by Rupa Huq MP on public order legislation outside “family planning clinics”.
Scroll down to watch the video!
Since the decision by Ealing council to try and impose a public spaces protection order (PSPO) around the Marie Stopes centre in Mattock Lane, Dr Huq has been campaigning for nationwide legislation, claiming that pro-life groups outside abortion clinics “harass” women. However, the testimony from “Kate” illustrates how untrue these assertions are, and how vital it is that women are allowed access to alternative choices.
“I leapt out of the window”
“I never wanted to go through with an abortion but I felt a lot of pressure from people around me who offered it as a no brainer solution,” the testimony began. “On the way into the clinic at the Marie Stopes clinic at Ealing I was offered a leaflet by a woman who I spoke to briefly. She just told me she was there if I needed her.” Still not happy with being there for an abortion, Kate “leapt out of the ground floor window and cleared 3 fences to escape. I talked to the woman on the gate again, who offered any support I needed to keep my baby and this gave me the confidence to leave where I was supported by the group that this women worked with.”
What would women like me do?
She didn’t find any aggression from the pro-lifers outside the clinic, but was given help to keep her daughter. Her story ended with a powerful message to MPs: “The potential introduction of buffer zones is a really bad idea because women like me, what would they do then? You know, not every woman that walks into those clinics actually wants to go through with the termination. There’s immense pressure, maybe they don’t have financial means to support themselves or their baby, or they feel like there’s no alternatives. These people offer alternatives.
“I had my baby who is now three and a half years old. She’s an amazing, perfect little girl and the love of my life. I want MPs here today calling to introduce buffer zones to realise, that she would not be alive today, if they had their way.”
Sir Edward Leigh spoke to offer a different perspective to that offered by Rupa Huq, who compared the pro-life groups outside Ealing to the “talk all over the media about the harassment of women in Westminster.” She was supported by Paula Sheriff MP, who described “anti-choice protesters” as “reprehensible”, and complained about Government money being given to Life to help vulnerable pregnant women. There was also a bizarre intervention by Diane Abbott, who said that the “guerrilla actions and threatening activity” of pro-life activists are modelled on tactics from America, where clinics have been closed “have been closed following demonstrations, attacks and even bombings.”
No crime or disorder
Nick Hurd, the minister for policing, responded that the Government believes that existing police powers are sufficient to protect people against harassment, but that “the Government will explore whether any further action is needed to ensure that clinic staff and patients can go about their lawful business free from harassment, offence or alarm.” He also stated that pro-life groups deny intimidation, and said such claims were “a million miles away” from his experience of talking to pro-life constituents, who presented the arguments “with great calmness and dignity”. Mr Hurd also confirmed that “the police recently assessed that pro-life demonstrations do not ordinarily result in crime or disorder, and it is rare that police intervention has been called for.”
Exposing the abortion industry in Parliament
Sir Edward Leigh was not the only politician to make a powerful pro-life speech in Parliament yesterday. In the Autumn Adjournment debate, Fiona Bruce MP took the opportunity to respond to Diana Johnson’s debate on the Abortion Act anniversary, held the previous day. She defended the money given to Life, which, she said, “is dwarfed by the amount paid to abortion providers…The Times reported that the head of Marie Stopes International, to which we pay millions of pounds to carry out abortions in the UK and overseas, received a phenomenal £420,000 in one recent year alone—four times the Prime Minister’s salary.”
Fiona Bruce also raised concerns about the CQC reports about Marie Stopes, “including criticism after finding dead, unborn babies in open bins,” and asked why bpas, which is also paid millions in taxpayer’s money, is allowed to spend it on political lobbying for decriminalisation.
LifeNews Note: Courtesy of SPUC. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children is a leading pro-life organization in the United Kingdom.
Alabama ABC Affiliate Can’t Find One Voter Who Believes WaPo Report About Roy Moore in Man-on-the-Street Segment
by JEFF POOR
During a segment that aired on Friday’s broadcast of Birmingham, AL ABC affiliate WBMA 33/40’s 5 p.m. local news, political reporter Lauren Walsh sought out voters in Columbiana, AL to gauge their reactions to the Washington Post report that alleged Republican U.S. Senate hopeful Roy Moore engaged in inappropriate conduct with four teenage girls more than 34 years ago.
None of the respondents according to Walsh told her they believed the Post’s reporting.
“It’s hard to believe the events that transpired yesterday,” Gordon Fluker of nearby Wilsonville, AL said to Walsh about the Washington Post report.
Fluker’s response was the standard according to Walsh.
“Out of all the voters we spoke with Friday in Columbiana, we didn’t find one voter who believed the Washington Post report about Moore,” she said.
Columbiana is the county seat of Shelby County, a county that is the home to many of Birmingham’s southern suburbs. The county is very Republican, and in last year’s presidential election, it went for Donald Trump by a 72-23 percent margin.
In the GOP primary and the subsequent runoff for next month’s special election won by Moore, Shelby County went for his opponent Luther Strange in both instances.
Moore defeated Strange by nine points in the GOP primary held in August. In the runoff a month later, Moore topped Strange by a 55-45 margin.
Moore faces Democrat candidate Doug Jones on December 12 for the U.S. Senate seat formerly held by Jeff Sessions.
Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor
Forget Hell: The US Gov’t Carried Out the Largest Church Massacre—24 Years Ago, In Texas
The mainstream media has completely forgotten about the deadliest church massacre in history, the one the US government carried out in Waco, Texas.
By Matt Agorist
On Sunday, a horrifying tragedy unfolded as a mass shooting terrorist walked into a Texas church and began slaughtering innocent women, men, and children. The massacre left 26 people dead, according to police, including an unborn child who died inside his pregnant mother.
On Wednesday, the names of the deceased were released along with the heartbreaking photos of the children, two of which were only 5 and 7-years-old. The tragedy is being dubbed the deadliest mass shooting in Texas history.
Sadly, there have been many deadly massacres which have taken place inside places of worship. From the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing to the Charleston Church shooting to Sutherland Springs, over the years, psychotic terrorists have gone into churches and indiscriminately taken innocent lives.
Now, some of those in the mainstream media are calling Sutherland Springs the deadly massacre in a church in US history. However, the actual largest church massacre in history had a far greater death toll.
The US government carried out the deadliest church massacre in history and it led to the deaths of 82 men, women, and children. It all came to a violent end 24 years ago in Texas.
Our source material comes from the FBI’s own vault, which contains two files on the case against Vernon Howell, also known as David Koresh. Koresh was the leader of the “Branch Davidians Seventh Day Adventists.” According to the FBI case file, Koresh was believed to have been holding people against their will at his compound in Waco, Texas, potentially guilty of “involuntary servitude and slavery” charges.
In 1992, Child Protective Services (CPS) was called in to investigate the accusations. After a thorough investigation, CPS concluded no one was being held at the compound against their will, nor any child abuse, and the federal prosecutor, who reviewed the report, saw no reason to prosecute Koresh. On October 16th, 1992, the FBI closed the case against Koresh and the allegations he was abusing children and holding his followers against their will.
Still, however, the FBI proceeded with investigating other allegations the Branch Davidians had converted semi-automatic AR-15 (assault) rifles into fully automatic ones, a violation of federal law. Also alleged was that the group was planning a mass suicide. The FBI concluded, “no information has been developed to verify the accuracy of the allegations.” Still, the FBI put local law enforcement on notice.
Despite having no concrete evidence Koresh, who some have said was delusional, had violated anyone’s civil rights, or abused any children, the investigation into the weapons violations continued. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives pursued the allegations the group was stockpiling weapons and explosives. According to the ATF, the bureau found:
136 FIREARMS, INCLUDING ASSAULT RIFLES AND HANDGUNS
700+ MAGAZINES FOR THOSE FIREARMS
200,000+ ROUNDS OF VARIOUS AMMUNITION
110 UPPER AND LOWER RECEIVERS FOR AR15/M16 RIFLES
GRENADE-LAUNCHER ATTACHMENTS FOR AR15/M16 RIFLES
400+ EMPTY M31 RIFLE GRENADES, ALONG WITH BLACK POWDER AND OTHER
EXPLOSIVE CHEMICALS
Wishing to further investigate the compound’s armory, the ATF secured a search warrant and attempted to raid the compound on February 28th, 1993. The Davidians, possibly feeling they must protect their home, property, and persons from the intruders, opened fire on the federal agents, an action which led to the deaths of several ATF agents and compound members.
FOUR ATF AGENTS (SA TODD MCKEEHAN, SA CONWAY LEBLEU, SA ROBERT WILLIAMS AND SA STEVEN WILLIS) WERE KILLED; 20 ATF AGENTS WOUNDED FROM GUNSHOTS OR SHRAPNEL AND 8 SUFFERED OTHER INJURIES. SIX DAVIDIANS WERE ALSO REPORTEDLY KILLED AND FOUR WOUNDED FROM GUNSHOTS, ALTHOUGH THIS COULD NOT BE FORENSICALLY PROVEN BECAUSE OF THE LATER DESTRUCTION (BY FIRE) OF THE COMPOUND.
The raid initiated a 51-day standoff with the ATF as well as the FBI. Koresh released 24 members from the compound, who were mostly children, and continued the stand-off with authorities which was broadcast daily across the country until day 51 arrived. On that day, the government brought in heavy equipment and penetrated the compound with a tank-like machine which pumped the compound full of CS Gas. What happened next, in the minds of many who saw it, can only be likened to a horror film.
The compound became ablaze with a roaring fire. The all-consuming inferno killed 76 people who were huddled inside. Later, it was determined many of those who’d perished were also shot by firearms. Researchers, who later investigated the incident, concluded federal agents were observed shooting from the compound’s grounds into the building already set ablaze by fire. While the official government narrative is those individuals committed suicide, the researchers were able to demonstrate they were likely killed by automatic weapons fired by federal agents, possibly killed as they were attempting to flee their burning compound.
To this day, the ATF maintains the fire was, “set by cult members, as law enforcement attempted to force them out by introducing tear gas into the building.” And for years, following the fiery destruction of the compound, the FBI maintained the same story line.
However, in 1999, then-Attorney General Janet Reno made the following admission, “I am very, very troubled by the information I received this week suggesting that pyrotechnic devices may have been used in the early morning hours on April the 19th, 1993, at Waco. At this time, all available indications are that the devices were not directed at the main wooden compound, were discharged several hours before the fire started, and were not the cause of the fire. Nonetheless, it is absolutely critical that we do everything humanly possible to learn all the facts as accurately as possible and make them available to the public and Congress.”
Those facts, according to some of the survivors of the fire, who were inside at the time the fire broke out, are undeniable. They are convinced the government used incendiary devices to set ablaze the tear gas which had been pumped into the building. And they’re not alone.
According to CBS News, “Independent filmmaker Michael McNulty came upon some evidence that appeared damaging to the government. He found a shell casing from a certain type of tear gas round that could start a fire – a device the Justice Department had denied using for more than six years – publicly and to Congress.”
That shell casing led to Reno’s acknowledgment, but the government still has not taken full responsibility, as Reno denied the devices were used to penetrate the building. Questions still remain as to why they would be used at all.
Even though it was later determined Koresh had, indeed, molested children, and was by all intents and purposes a pedophile of the worst kind, the fact remains. The government used gas and allegedly fired on its own people which either directly or indirectly led to the deaths of 76 people — inside a church. Sadly, there was no outcry and this incident serves as a brutal reminder of what can happen when the US government makes up its mind to take out those they disagree with.
700+ MAGAZINES FOR THOSE FIREARMS
200,000+ ROUNDS OF VARIOUS AMMUNITION
110 UPPER AND LOWER RECEIVERS FOR AR15/M16 RIFLES
GRENADE-LAUNCHER ATTACHMENTS FOR AR15/M16 RIFLES
400+ EMPTY M31 RIFLE GRENADES, ALONG WITH BLACK POWDER AND OTHER
EXPLOSIVE CHEMICALS
Wishing to further investigate the compound’s armory, the ATF secured a search warrant and attempted to raid the compound on February 28th, 1993. The Davidians, possibly feeling they must protect their home, property, and persons from the intruders, opened fire on the federal agents, an action which led to the deaths of several ATF agents and compound members.
FOUR ATF AGENTS (SA TODD MCKEEHAN, SA CONWAY LEBLEU, SA ROBERT WILLIAMS AND SA STEVEN WILLIS) WERE KILLED; 20 ATF AGENTS WOUNDED FROM GUNSHOTS OR SHRAPNEL AND 8 SUFFERED OTHER INJURIES. SIX DAVIDIANS WERE ALSO REPORTEDLY KILLED AND FOUR WOUNDED FROM GUNSHOTS, ALTHOUGH THIS COULD NOT BE FORENSICALLY PROVEN BECAUSE OF THE LATER DESTRUCTION (BY FIRE) OF THE COMPOUND.
The raid initiated a 51-day standoff with the ATF as well as the FBI. Koresh released 24 members from the compound, who were mostly children, and continued the stand-off with authorities which was broadcast daily across the country until day 51 arrived. On that day, the government brought in heavy equipment and penetrated the compound with a tank-like machine which pumped the compound full of CS Gas. What happened next, in the minds of many who saw it, can only be likened to a horror film.
The compound became ablaze with a roaring fire. The all-consuming inferno killed 76 people who were huddled inside. Later, it was determined many of those who’d perished were also shot by firearms. Researchers, who later investigated the incident, concluded federal agents were observed shooting from the compound’s grounds into the building already set ablaze by fire. While the official government narrative is those individuals committed suicide, the researchers were able to demonstrate they were likely killed by automatic weapons fired by federal agents, possibly killed as they were attempting to flee their burning compound.
To this day, the ATF maintains the fire was, “set by cult members, as law enforcement attempted to force them out by introducing tear gas into the building.” And for years, following the fiery destruction of the compound, the FBI maintained the same story line.
However, in 1999, then-Attorney General Janet Reno made the following admission, “I am very, very troubled by the information I received this week suggesting that pyrotechnic devices may have been used in the early morning hours on April the 19th, 1993, at Waco. At this time, all available indications are that the devices were not directed at the main wooden compound, were discharged several hours before the fire started, and were not the cause of the fire. Nonetheless, it is absolutely critical that we do everything humanly possible to learn all the facts as accurately as possible and make them available to the public and Congress.”
Those facts, according to some of the survivors of the fire, who were inside at the time the fire broke out, are undeniable. They are convinced the government used incendiary devices to set ablaze the tear gas which had been pumped into the building. And they’re not alone.
According to CBS News, “Independent filmmaker Michael McNulty came upon some evidence that appeared damaging to the government. He found a shell casing from a certain type of tear gas round that could start a fire – a device the Justice Department had denied using for more than six years – publicly and to Congress.”That shell casing led to Reno’s acknowledgment, but the government still has not taken full responsibility, as Reno denied the devices were used to penetrate the building. Questions still remain as to why they would be used at all.
Even though it was later determined Koresh had, indeed, molested children, and was by all intents and purposes a pedophile of the worst kind, the fact remains. The government used gas and allegedly fired on its own people which either directly or indirectly led to the deaths of 76 people — inside a church. Sadly, there was no outcry and this incident serves as a brutal reminder of what can happen when the US government makes up its mind to take out those they disagree with.
Trump Humiliates Hillary With Single Tweet
Even after completely destroying Hillary Clinton, President Trump still can’t stop going after her, and it’s Hilarious!
On Wednesday the President tweeted:
Congratulations to all of the ”DEPLORABLES” and the millions of people who gave us a MASSIVE (304-227) Electoral College landslide victory!
If you don’t remember, this was in reference to the election in 2016 when Hillary Clinton called many Trump supporters a “basket of deplorables.” She went on to call them, “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, you name it.”
Baltimore Mayor Pugh says crime 'out of control,' orders agencies to meet with police every morning
Baltimore Mayor Catherine Pugh meets at 8 every morning with more than 30 department heads to talk about fighting crime in the city.
Calling violence in Baltimore “out of control,” Mayor Catherine Pugh ordered 30 agency heads to meet every morning at police headquarters, and to make crime reduction the top mission not only of police, but also of health workers, housing officials and public works crews.
The mayor ordered the directors of more than half of the city’s 55 departments to report to meetings daily at 8 a.m., when they will plan with Police Commissioner Kevin Davis where weeds should be cut, lead paint covered and drug houses boarded up and job applications can be handed out, among other tasks.
Pugh appeared at City Hall Thursday flanked by agency heads.
“Violence in the city is out of control,” she said. “I want every neighborhood to know I am extremely concerned and focused on reducing violence.”
Killings in the city have surged past 300 this year for a third year in a row. Violent crime is up 13 percent over last year, and reports of groups of youths attacking people apparently at random have dominated recent local news cycles.
Pugh said she was calling on businesses and philanthropies to help fund a $10 million expansion of the anti-violence Safe Streets program. And she extended night and weekend hours at six recreation centers to try to keep young people out of harm’s way.
“We must do everything we can,” Pugh said. “We’ve already hit 303 murders, which is totally unacceptable. … We know we can do better.”
City Councilman Brandon Scott, the chairman of the council’s public safety committee and a frequent critic of Pugh, said he was pleased with the mayor’s approach. He said addressing broken street lights, vacant buildings and other problems can help cut down on crime.
Scott said he has been saying as much for months.
“My only disappointment is it didn’t happen earlier,” he said. “I think it can have an immediate impact. When you’re focusing on small geographical areas, you can see the same block where we’ve had three shootings, there are hundreds of housing violations and streets lights out and a rec center that can be opened.”
Baltimore Police Commissioner Kevin Davis talks about the recent crimes being committed by youth in the city. City Council President Bernard C. “Jack” Young called the mayor’s plan a “good first step” in addressing the violence.
The mayor’s news conference came shortly after another held by Davis at police headquarters. The commissioner decried a “broken juvenile justice system,” in which he said judges, prosecutors, parents and other guardians are failing the young people in their care, and thus the city at large.
Davis said he asks himself every day what else police can do — and believes others in the community must do the same. He said police officers are making arrests and taking violent offenders off the streets, only to see them released with little or no repercussions.
“Poverty, unemployment, family dysfunctions, drug addictions — all those things are very, very real in our city,” Davis said. “But they do not excuse violent behavior by anyone, particularly juveniles.
“We need to all look ourselves in the mirror as a community of parents, grandparents, guardians in particular, and get ahold of these violent kids who are wreaking havoc in our city right now.”
Davis cited the violent carjacking of a 35-year-old man by a group of juveniles near a synagogue in Northwest Baltimore on Thursday morning, and a series of recent attacks downtown and on Halloween night in the city.
He said police see the same youths committing crimes time and time again. He said he knows of one 16-year-old boy who has been arrested ten times since 2014 — for larceny, attempted robbery, burglary, carjacking, assault, two theft charges and three car theft charges — but keeps being released. He said many juveniles have similar records.
“We know who they are,” Davis said. “And if we know who they are — and the reason why we know who they are is because we lock them up again and again and again — then I’m pretty damned certain that their parents and guardians and grandparents and neighbors know who the hell they are as well.
“Step up. Step forward. Get ahold of these violent kids. It’s absolutely unacceptable that I have to stand up here and talk about 13- and 14-year-olds that we have to arrest again and again because our criminal justice system and our society isn’t doing what we need to be doing with these kids.”
Davis said he spoke to Baltimore City Schools CEO Sonja Santelises “at length” on Wednesday, and they are “looking to see what we can do more together.”
“There are a lot of privacy laws associated with juveniles who are arrested and charged with crimes, and we’re going to work with our attorneys to figure out how we can share the identities of these violent young people with the school system in a legal way so they can attempt some interventions,” Davis said. “Right now, their behaviors need to be interrupted. They either need to be interrupted with a jail cell or some other type of intervention. But the way we’re doing it right now isn’t working.”
Santelises said some of the youths committing crimes have dropped out of school.
“One of the things we’re working on is paying far closer attention to our chronic absentees,” she said. “We are identifying: Who are the young people in each school who are most vulnerable to being recruited for criminal activity?”
Under Maryland law, 16- and 17-year-olds who are charged with violent crimes appear first in adult court. Davis has expressed frustration at the number of such cases that are then moved to juvenile court.
Police spokesman T.J. Smith said the percentage of such cases has “increased dramatically” in recent years.
“That’s not saying juveniles have become less violent or less dangerous,” he said. “They’re just not prosecuting them as adults.
“We’re not trying to over-criminalize anyone. But I think any victim in the city that has a gun stuck in their face by a 16-year-old kid, and their car taken from them, or they’re beat up by this 16-year-old kid with a gun stuck in their face, want that child to be held accountable in some way, shape or form. And that child should not have an opportunity to stick that gun in the face of multiple individuals.”
Davis said the rehabilitation-only focus of the juvenile justice system in Maryland is appropriate for mischief, destruction of property, trespassing or shoplifting. But “today’s violent juvenile offender is robbing people, assaulting people, and carjacking people,” he said, and “our lawmakers need to strengthen the consequences and lower the threshold for detention.”
Police have arrested four juveniles in a Halloween night attack on a woman with a wooden board. Smith said a small group of young people are “disproportionately responsible for way too much of this type of violent crime.”
In the carjacking Thursday morning, Davis said, the victim had just dropped his child off at school when “he was pinned by a suspect vehicle against his car.”
“He started to run away and they chased him, the suspects chased him, beat him up, took his car keys, and took off in his car,” Davis said.
Police are working with regional partners to investigate the incident, Davis said.
City Councilman Isaac “Yitzy” Schleifer, who represents the area, said more must be done to address violent attacks by juveniles.
“I’m going to be very clear,” he said. “Those who are committing violent offenses in our communities, wreaking havoc on our communities and our citizens, must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. These are people who are holding people up at knifepoint, at gunpoint, beating up innocent people, stealing their cars. They need to be held accountable.”
Schleifer said he wants to know why certain offenders he knows from the neighborhood keep getting released after being arrested despite their records.
“How did they get to the point where they are running around with ankle bracelets on and still committing offenses?” he asked.
PODESTAS FACE INDICTMENT – SOURCES
As Infowars predicted, elites move to sacrifice Clintons, Podestas
By Jamie White & Kit Daniels 
Tony and John Podesta are facing criminal indictments linked to the ongoing Russian probe, according to sources, which explains why they’re shutting down the Podesta Group, one of Washington’s most prominent law firms.
Sources tell Infowars that Tony Podesta in particular was told to prepare for indictments because Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller’s entire case against former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort goes through Podesta, and evidence suggests that Podesta has done everything Manafort is accused of doing, if not more.
“The Podestas might be used as sacrificial lambs for the Democratic Party,” radio host Alex Jones said, who was briefed by sources close to the matter.
The Podesta Group is entangled in Mueller’s investigation after it was revealed that the law firm was recruited for public relations work in Ukraine by Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, both of whom were accused by Mueller last month of violating foreign lobbying law.
Still reeling from the loss of the White House, the Democratic establishment is also trying to separate the Democratic Party brand from the Clintons and their close allies which, naturally, would include John Podesta, the former campaign chair for Hillary’s failed 2016 presidential bid.
“More and more evidence shows the Democrats are turning against the Clintons, who were once thought invincible but are now on the chopping block as the party realizes they’re destroying the brand and thus must be removed,” Jones added. “We may not just only witness the fall of the Podestas but the Clintons as well.”
Kimberly Fritts, who was the Podesta Group’s CEO before she quit unexpectedly Friday, said the lobbying firm will be shut down by the end of the year, adding that employees may not be paid after November 15.
Infowars host Roger Stone predicted the Podestas’ downfall weeks ago, and Infowars also correctly predicted the power elites would sacrifice the Clintons to savage the globalist agenda implemented by the Democratic Party.
“You’ll notice [John Podesta’s] brother was forced to step down from their extremely lucrative influence-peddling operations in Washington D.C.” Stone said on The Alex Jones Show. “I think [John Podesta’s] becoming unhinged because they are getting exposed. Their whole carefully constructed Russia narrative is falling apart before their very eyes.”
Tony Podesta, who at one time was Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff, first stepped down as chief executive of his law firm last month after Mueller had begun investigating him.
And as mentioned, Fritts then unexpectedly quit as CEO of the Podesta Group on Friday to start her own lobbying firm.
The Podesta’s are so desperate to avoid charges that Tony’s lawyer sent Fox host Tucker Carlson a cease-and-desist for reporting on the Podesta Group’s ties to Manafort.
The impending closing of the Podesta Group marks the downfall of one of Washington’s most influential law firms of the last 30 years and signals the continuing collapse of the Russia/Trump narrative peddled by the Clinton camp who were simply projecting.
“The Podestas might be used as sacrificial lambs for the Democratic Party,” radio host Alex Jones said, who was briefed by sources close to the matter.
The Podesta Group is entangled in Mueller’s investigation after it was revealed that the law firm was recruited for public relations work in Ukraine by Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, both of whom were accused by Mueller last month of violating foreign lobbying law.
Still reeling from the loss of the White House, the Democratic establishment is also trying to separate the Democratic Party brand from the Clintons and their close allies which, naturally, would include John Podesta, the former campaign chair for Hillary’s failed 2016 presidential bid.
“More and more evidence shows the Democrats are turning against the Clintons, who were once thought invincible but are now on the chopping block as the party realizes they’re destroying the brand and thus must be removed,” Jones added. “We may not just only witness the fall of the Podestas but the Clintons as well.”
Kimberly Fritts, who was the Podesta Group’s CEO before she quit unexpectedly Friday, said the lobbying firm will be shut down by the end of the year, adding that employees may not be paid after November 15.
Infowars host Roger Stone predicted the Podestas’ downfall weeks ago, and Infowars also correctly predicted the power elites would sacrifice the Clintons to savage the globalist agenda implemented by the Democratic Party.
“You’ll notice [John Podesta’s] brother was forced to step down from their extremely lucrative influence-peddling operations in Washington D.C.” Stone said on The Alex Jones Show. “I think [John Podesta’s] becoming unhinged because they are getting exposed. Their whole carefully constructed Russia narrative is falling apart before their very eyes.”
Tony Podesta, who at one time was Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff, first stepped down as chief executive of his law firm last month after Mueller had begun investigating him.
And as mentioned, Fritts then unexpectedly quit as CEO of the Podesta Group on Friday to start her own lobbying firm.
The Podesta’s are so desperate to avoid charges that Tony’s lawyer sent Fox host Tucker Carlson a cease-and-desist for reporting on the Podesta Group’s ties to Manafort.
The impending closing of the Podesta Group marks the downfall of one of Washington’s most influential law firms of the last 30 years and signals the continuing collapse of the Russia/Trump narrative peddled by the Clinton camp who were simply projecting.
We know that it was Hillary's campaign that bankrolled the discredited anti-Trump dossier. But now it appears that her presidential campaign also paid Steele's dubious Kremlin "sources" for the information they provided - much of it already proven to be phony.How much more discredited can that dossier get?
Hillary's campaign admitted that it secretly paid Fusion GPS $1,020,000 to amass the dossier framing Trump for allegedly colluding with the Russians. The payments were funneled through D.C. law firm Perkins, Cole. Fusion then paid former MI-6 spook Christopher Steele $168,000 to do the leg work and cover his expenses.
But Steele could not travel to Russia, since he no longer had diplomatic protection. So, his M.O. was to instead pay Russian sources and use third parties to talk to them. That has been widely reported. And his contract reportedly called for expenses as well as his fee. Paying the informants would definitely be an expense.
Michael Morell, a Hillary supporter and the former acting CIA Director confirmed that "Mr. Steele paid the Russian intelligence sources who provided the information and never met them directly."
So, connect the dots. If Hillary's campaign paid Fusion, Fusion paid Steele, and Steele paid his sources, ergo: Hillary's campaign paid Steele's sources.
So not only did Hillary benefit from the disinformation Steele concocted, she underwrote the payouts to his Russian sources.
She made the entire Trump/Russian collusion/illusion happen. She now falsely states that her campaign simply picked up where the Republicans left off on the anti-Trump research.
That's a lie. There were no foreign intelligence operatives involved until her campaign took over. That's a matter of record. It was Hillary who took it to the next level.
Don’t forget that's Hillary's M.O. Hire private eyes through law firms and pay them to dig up dirt on her enemies. It's an old story.
Her campaign paid to collect many of the fabricated stories that animated the dossier.
Who exactly did she pay? Steele's unorthodox sources included:
Source A: a "senior Russian foreign ministry figure."
Source B: a "former top-level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin."
Source C: "senior Russian financial officer still active in the Kremlin"
Source G: simply identified in the dossier as "a Kremlin official."
So, we have a U.S. presidential candidate, a former Secretary of State, paying an ex- British spy to, in turn, pay top officials in the Kremlin -- with campaign money secretly funneled through that former spy -- to provide information she can use in her negative campaign -- info that is largely false.
Who else did she pay? Steele says that much of his information came from "unsolicited sources"? Who were these sources and how did they know to pass information to Steele? Were other foreign spooks hired to provide more intel to Steele?
We need to know.
There's over $800,000 of the money paid to Fusion by the campaign that hasn't been unaccounted for. It's not just other spooks who might have benefitted. There are some questions about the press.
Did Hillary pay journalists to hype the dossier story?
We need to know. The House Intelligence Committee has just reached an agreement for Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson to testify next week.
It's time for some answers.
To date, Fusion has refused to comply with a subpoena from the House Intelligence Committee for its bank records, a request specifically geared to determine if it had paid any journalists. Fusion does not deny that it made such payments, but claims a first amendment privilege.
So, Hillary's campaign may have paid Russian sources, instruments of Vladimir Putin, to provide fabricated evidence to sell the idea that Trump was colluding with Putin (when, in fact, she was doing the colluding). And then she may have paid journalists to report, spin, and hype the story that resulted.
Her efforts have been fabulously successful. While she lost the election, she has cast a shadow over Trump's transition and his first year in office. The dossier she paid for has led Special Prosecutor on a wild goose chase after the Holy Grail -- evidence of collusion that never happened.
Endless Accusations Cloud the Truth
BY ANDREW CLAVAN
Roy Moore
I have to write this quickly because any minute now, Senate candidate Roy Moore might quit or be cleared or might simply be blown out of the headlines by some fresh violent atrocity that the media will either attempt to exploit in an effort to destroy our second amendment or attempt to distort so we don't notice that every killer involved happened to be named Mohammed. At my back, I always hear the news cycle's winged chariot drawing near.
I'm in a hotel in New York, and this morning over my covfefe in the lounge, I looked up at a television and saw a Chyron announcing that someone I'd never heard of was finally going to "break her silence." And I thought, "Oh, please don't." Silence has become a precious commodity and we need as much of it as we can get. Otherwise, it's all noise and outrage and outrage at the noise and noise about the outrage. As far as I'm concerned, you should only break your silence in case of emergency.
But so far, my words have gone unheeded. And now controversial and kind-of-hilarious Senate candidate Roy Moore has been accused of sexual contact with a 14-year-old girl back in 1979 when he was 32. He's said to have carried on with a couple of other young-but-legal girls as well. The contact with the child wasn't forced but, of course, she was too young to consent to it and he was old enough to be responsible, so it's bad.
I can only see one rational moral response to this: If it's true, he should step down; if it's a political frame-up, he should fight it.
What bothers me about the story is I have absolutely no idea which is the case. No clue. Even before the allegations were made, I had been thinking about how easy it would be to set someone up in the current climate. Get a few women together. Say something happened too long ago to check. No one reads past the headline, and everyone's done something at some point they shouldn't have, so it's a slam dunk smear.
In this particular case, too, everyone in establishment politics hates Moore. (I mean, he is kind of a loony-tune, but if that disqualified you to work in the capitol, the place would be empty.) So no one will come running to his defense.
Or... maybe he's just guilty. I really don't know.
I blame feminists and the media for this cloud of confusion, mostly because I hate feminists and the media, but also because they do bear some of the blame. For instance, the New York Times, a former newspaper, now has a tip line where you can complain about something sexual someone famous did to you back in the day. How is that not going to lead to abuse? Liars will flock to it. And if someone calls up and complains about Barack Obama, and someone else calls up and complains about Rush Limbaugh — which one do you think the Times will follow up on? Me too.
And then Toxic Feminists (a redundancy, I know) with their snarling hatred of men and masculinity start shrieking about how it's an outrage that any male should be considered innocent until proven guilty or that any one event should be judged less egregious than any other. With that kind of attitude, things can get very Salem-y very fast
USA Today has a running list of Hollywood sexual offenders and I was reading through it and came upon the charges against Dustin Hoffman. The now 80-year-old Hoffman is accused of talking dirty to one woman and inviting another woman on a date some 30-odd years ago. And you know what? I don't care. Not even a little. I think Harvey Weinstein, assuming he's guilty, should go to prison for what he did and I think what Hoffman allegedly did shouldn't even be mentioned in the papers. When they're both on the same list, the whole list becomes a moral blur.
Human life is complicated. Sexuality is one of the most complicated parts of human life. Some people make errors, other people corner you in the basement and bang off in front of you, and still other people tell lies. If any voice can be raised against any man and illicit the same level of outrage, all voices will eventually blend into a silence of obscurity and indifference — and that's a kind of silence that's very difficult to break.
BUSTED: WaPo Failed To Disclose Roy Moore Accuser Worked As Sign Language Interpreter For Hillary & Biden — Openly Supports Doug Jones
One of GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore’s accusers, Debbie Gibson, has worked as a sign language interpreter for Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Deborah Wesson Gibson, as she goes by on Facebook, supports Moore’s Democrat rival, Doug Jones.
Why didn’t the Washington Post disclose these details?
On Friday, Newsmax columnist James Hirsen tweeted the “Washington Post failed to disclose that one of Moore’s accusers was a sign language interpreter for Joe Biden and is a volunteer for Moore’s Democrat opponent.”
The Washington Post failed to disclose that one of Moore's accusers was a sign language interpreter for Joe Biden and is a volunteer for Moore's Democrat opponent.
11:06 AM - Nov 10, 2017
While The Gateway Pundit cannot confirm Gibson is a volunteer for Doug Jones, we found Facebook posts that suggest she is a Democrat who wants to see Doug Jones become Alabama’s next Senator.
Here is Gibson working at Clinton’s campaign stop in Alabama:
Photo credit: Activist Mommy
In two separate posts, Gibson expresses her support for Doug Jones by sharing the Democrat candidate’s Facebook post:
Photo credit: Activist Mommy
Note the photo of Gibson and Biden that she posted herself in the comment section.
Gibson shared a story from New York Magazine, highlighting Doug Jones’ seemingly good chances of beating Moore.
Photo credit: Activist Mommy
At the time of publication, both posts on Jones and Moore were deleted from her page.
As The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft previously reported, the Washington Post accused Judge Moore of dating a 14 year-old girl in 1979.
On Thursday a top Alabama political activist wrote The Gateway Pundit with this: “I think it’s total malarkey! The opposition, McConnell included, will do anything to keep him out!”
Judge Roy Moore posted this official response Thursday night against the “forces of evil.”
The Obama-Clinton Machine’s liberal media lapdogs just launched the most vicious and nasty round of attacks against me I’ve EVER faced! We are are in the midst of a spiritual battle with those who want to silence our message. (1/4) #ALSen
The forces of evil will lie, cheat, steal –– even inflict physical harm –– if they believe it will silence and shut up Christian conservatives like you and me. (2/4) #ALSen
Judge Roy Moore @MooreSenateI believe you and I have a duty to stand up and fight back against the forces of evil waging an all-out war on our conservative values!Our nation is at a crossroads right now — both spiritually and politically. (3/4) #ALSen
Judge Roy Moore @MooreSenate
I believe you and I have a duty to stand up and fight back against the forces of evil waging an all-out war on our conservative values!Our nation is at a crossroads right now — both spiritually and politically. (3/4) #ALSen
Our children and grandchildren’s futures are on the line. So rest assured — I will NEVER
GIVE UP the fight! (4/4) #ALSen
GIVE UP the fight! (4/4) #ALSen
G’ day…Ciao…Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://capitalstories.blogspot.com/2017/11/httpift_12.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment